Theresa Barnes, Gordon Abakah-Nkrumah, Oboshie Oboshie Anim-Boamah, Promise E. Sefogah
{"title":"Legal and ethical challenges in assisted reproductive technology practice in Ghana","authors":"Theresa Barnes, Gordon Abakah-Nkrumah, Oboshie Oboshie Anim-Boamah, Promise E. Sefogah","doi":"10.4314/gmj.v58i1.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Infertility remains a global challenge, with assisted reproductive technology (ART) progressively gaining relevance in developing countries, including Ghana. However, associated ethico-legal challenges have not received the needed policy attention. This study explored the legal and ethical challenges of ART practice in Ghana.Design: The study employed an exploratory phenomenological approach to examine ART in Ghana, focusing on ethics and law governing this practice.Participants: Respondents were ART practitioners, managers, facility owners, representatives of surrogacy/gamete donor agencies, and regulatory body representatives.Methods: A semi-structured interview guide was used to collect data. The in-depth interviews were audiotaped, and responses transcribed for analysis through coding, followed by generation of themes and sub-themes, supported with direct quotes.Results: It emerged that there are no ethical and legal frameworks for ART practice in Ghana, and this adversely affects ART practice. Ethical challenges identified border on informed consent, clients’ privacy and clinical data protection, gamete donation issues, multiple gestations, single parenting, and social and religious issues. The legal challenges identified include the non-existence of a legal regime for regulating ART practice and the absence of a professional body with clear-cut guidelines on ART practice. In the absence of legal and ethical frameworks in Ghana, practitioners intimated they do comply with internationally accepted principles and general ethics in medical practice.Conclusion: There are no regulations on ART in Ghana. Legal and ethical guidelines are essential to the provision ofsafe and successful ART practices to protect providers and users. Governmental efforts to regulate Ghana need to beprioritized.","PeriodicalId":35509,"journal":{"name":"Ghana Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ghana Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/gmj.v58i1.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Infertility remains a global challenge, with assisted reproductive technology (ART) progressively gaining relevance in developing countries, including Ghana. However, associated ethico-legal challenges have not received the needed policy attention. This study explored the legal and ethical challenges of ART practice in Ghana.Design: The study employed an exploratory phenomenological approach to examine ART in Ghana, focusing on ethics and law governing this practice.Participants: Respondents were ART practitioners, managers, facility owners, representatives of surrogacy/gamete donor agencies, and regulatory body representatives.Methods: A semi-structured interview guide was used to collect data. The in-depth interviews were audiotaped, and responses transcribed for analysis through coding, followed by generation of themes and sub-themes, supported with direct quotes.Results: It emerged that there are no ethical and legal frameworks for ART practice in Ghana, and this adversely affects ART practice. Ethical challenges identified border on informed consent, clients’ privacy and clinical data protection, gamete donation issues, multiple gestations, single parenting, and social and religious issues. The legal challenges identified include the non-existence of a legal regime for regulating ART practice and the absence of a professional body with clear-cut guidelines on ART practice. In the absence of legal and ethical frameworks in Ghana, practitioners intimated they do comply with internationally accepted principles and general ethics in medical practice.Conclusion: There are no regulations on ART in Ghana. Legal and ethical guidelines are essential to the provision ofsafe and successful ART practices to protect providers and users. Governmental efforts to regulate Ghana need to beprioritized.
目的:不孕不育症仍然是一个全球性的挑战,辅助生殖技术(ART)在包括加纳在内的发展中国家正逐步得到重视。然而,与之相关的伦理-法律挑战并未得到政策上的必要关注。本研究探讨了加纳辅助生殖技术实践所面临的法律和伦理挑战:本研究采用探索性现象学方法研究加纳的抗逆转录病毒疗法,重点关注该疗法的伦理和法律问题:受访者包括 ART 从业人员、管理人员、设施所有者、代孕/捐精机构代表以及监管机构代表:采用半结构化访谈指南收集数据。对深入访谈进行了录音,并将回答转录,通过编码进行分析,然后生成主题和次主题,并辅以直接引语:结果表明,加纳的抗逆转录病毒疗法没有伦理和法律框架,这对抗逆疗法的实践产生了不利影响。已确定的伦理挑战包括知情同意、客户隐私和临床数据保护、配子捐赠问题、多胎妊娠、单亲以及社会和宗教问题。法律方面的挑战包括没有规范抗逆转录病毒疗法实践的法律制度,也没有专业机构为抗逆转录病毒疗法实践制定明确的指导方针。在加纳缺乏法律和伦理框架的情况下,从业人员表示他们确实遵守了国际公认的医疗实践原则和一般伦理:加纳没有关于抗逆转录病毒疗法的法规。法律和道德准则对于提供安全、成功的抗逆转录病毒疗法以保护提供者和使用者至关重要。加纳政府需要优先考虑制定相关法规。