Dissociating reading and auditory comprehension in persons with aphasia

Rachael M Harrington, Sigfus Kristinsson, Janina Wilmskoetter, N. Busby, D. den Ouden, Chris Rorden, J. Fridriksson, L. Bonilha
{"title":"Dissociating reading and auditory comprehension in persons with aphasia","authors":"Rachael M Harrington, Sigfus Kristinsson, Janina Wilmskoetter, N. Busby, D. den Ouden, Chris Rorden, J. Fridriksson, L. Bonilha","doi":"10.1093/braincomms/fcae102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Language comprehension is often affected in individuals with post-stroke aphasia. However, deficits in auditory comprehension are not fully correlated with deficits in reading comprehension and the mechanisms underlying this dissociation remain unclear. This distinction is important for understanding language mechanisms, predicting long-term impairments, and future development of treatment interventions. Using comprehensive auditory and reading measures from a large cohort of individuals with aphasia, we evaluated the relationship between aphasia type and reading comprehension impairments, the relationship between auditory vs. reading comprehension deficits and the crucial neuroanatomy supporting the dissociation between post-stroke reading and auditory deficits.\n Scores from the Western Aphasia Battery Revised (WAB-R) from 70 participants with aphasia after a left-hemisphere stroke were utilized to evaluate both reading and auditory comprehension of linguistically equivalent stimuli. Repeated-measures and univariate analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to assess the relationship between auditory comprehension and aphasia types and correlations were employed to test the relationship between reading and auditory comprehension deficits. Lesion symptom mapping (LSM) was used to determine the dissociation of crucial brain structures supporting reading comprehension deficits controlling for auditory deficits and vice-versa.\n Participants with Broca's or global aphasia had the worst performance on reading comprehension. Auditory comprehension explained 26% of the variance in reading comprehension for sentence completion and 44% for following sequential commands. Controlling for auditory comprehension, worse reading comprehension performance was independently associated with damage to the inferior temporal gyrus, fusiform gyrus, posterior inferior temporal gyrus, inferior occipital gyrus, lingual gyrus, and posterior thalamic radiation.\n Auditory and reading comprehension are only partly correlated in aphasia. Reading is an integral part of daily life and directly associated with quality of life and functional outcomes. This study demonstrated that reading performance is directly related to lesioned areas in the boundaries between visual association regions and ventral stream language areas. This behavioral and neuroanatomical dissociation provides information about the neurobiology of language and mechanisms for potential future treatment interventions.","PeriodicalId":504765,"journal":{"name":"Brain Communications","volume":" 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcae102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Language comprehension is often affected in individuals with post-stroke aphasia. However, deficits in auditory comprehension are not fully correlated with deficits in reading comprehension and the mechanisms underlying this dissociation remain unclear. This distinction is important for understanding language mechanisms, predicting long-term impairments, and future development of treatment interventions. Using comprehensive auditory and reading measures from a large cohort of individuals with aphasia, we evaluated the relationship between aphasia type and reading comprehension impairments, the relationship between auditory vs. reading comprehension deficits and the crucial neuroanatomy supporting the dissociation between post-stroke reading and auditory deficits. Scores from the Western Aphasia Battery Revised (WAB-R) from 70 participants with aphasia after a left-hemisphere stroke were utilized to evaluate both reading and auditory comprehension of linguistically equivalent stimuli. Repeated-measures and univariate analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to assess the relationship between auditory comprehension and aphasia types and correlations were employed to test the relationship between reading and auditory comprehension deficits. Lesion symptom mapping (LSM) was used to determine the dissociation of crucial brain structures supporting reading comprehension deficits controlling for auditory deficits and vice-versa. Participants with Broca's or global aphasia had the worst performance on reading comprehension. Auditory comprehension explained 26% of the variance in reading comprehension for sentence completion and 44% for following sequential commands. Controlling for auditory comprehension, worse reading comprehension performance was independently associated with damage to the inferior temporal gyrus, fusiform gyrus, posterior inferior temporal gyrus, inferior occipital gyrus, lingual gyrus, and posterior thalamic radiation. Auditory and reading comprehension are only partly correlated in aphasia. Reading is an integral part of daily life and directly associated with quality of life and functional outcomes. This study demonstrated that reading performance is directly related to lesioned areas in the boundaries between visual association regions and ventral stream language areas. This behavioral and neuroanatomical dissociation provides information about the neurobiology of language and mechanisms for potential future treatment interventions.
失语症患者的阅读和听觉理解分离
脑卒中后失语症患者的语言理解能力通常会受到影响。然而,听觉理解能力的缺陷与阅读理解能力的缺陷并不完全相关,这种分离的机制仍不清楚。这种区别对于理解语言机制、预测长期障碍和未来治疗干预措施的发展非常重要。通过对大量失语症患者的听觉和阅读能力进行综合测量,我们评估了失语症类型与阅读理解能力障碍之间的关系、听觉与阅读理解能力障碍之间的关系,以及支持卒中后阅读和听觉障碍之间分离的关键神经解剖学。研究人员利用 70 名左半球中风后失语症患者的西方失语测验修订版(WAB-R)得分,对等效语言刺激的阅读和听觉理解能力进行了评估。重复测量和单变量方差分析(ANOVA)用于评估听觉理解能力与失语症类型之间的关系,相关分析用于检验阅读和听觉理解能力缺陷之间的关系。病变症状映射(LSM)用于确定支持阅读理解缺陷的关键大脑结构与听觉缺陷的分离情况,反之亦然。患有布罗卡失语症或全面性失语症的参与者在阅读理解方面的表现最差。听觉理解能力解释了阅读理解能力中26%的句子完成差异,44%的顺序命令遵循差异。如果不考虑听觉理解能力,阅读理解能力较差与颞下回、纺锤形回、颞下回后部、枕下回、舌回和丘脑后部辐射受损有独立关联。在失语症患者中,听觉和阅读理解只有部分相关。阅读是日常生活中不可或缺的一部分,与生活质量和功能结果直接相关。这项研究表明,阅读能力与视觉联想区和腹侧流语言区之间的病变区域直接相关。这种行为和神经解剖上的分离为语言的神经生物学和未来潜在的治疗干预机制提供了信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书