Laboratory Risk Analysis in a Branch Hospital: The L-type Matrix

Q4 Social Sciences
Fatma KANTAS YİLMAZ, S. Karakuş
{"title":"Laboratory Risk Analysis in a Branch Hospital: The L-type Matrix","authors":"Fatma KANTAS YİLMAZ, S. Karakuş","doi":"10.3126/ijosh.v14i2.53996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Laboratory workers are often exposed to various risk factors, which can be classified as biological, physical, chemical, psychosocial, and ergonomic. This study aims to conduct a risk analysis in the workers of microbiology and biochemistry laboratories of a branch hospital in Istanbul, Türkiye to identify occupational health and safety risks and provide recommendations for measures to be taken.\nMethods: The investigators conducted the risk analysis with a five-person team including occupational health and safety experts, a laboratory manager, and technicians. Risk assessments were performed using the L-type matrix 5x5 diagram. The level of risk was determined with the product of probability and severity.\nResults: Risk analysis in the microbiology laboratory showed ten risk factors. Three of them had moderate level scores as following \"working with xylene\", “continuous standing work” and \"insufficient free space\". The remaining risks have low-risk scores, including \"working in a noisy environment, \"microscope light and ambient light\", \"working with blood\", \"working with feces\", \"non-ergonomic chairs\", \"insufficient airflow in the environment\" and \"continuous presence in a closed space\". In the biochemistry laboratory, four were classified as moderate risk, including working in constant standing, exposure to bodily fluids, blood tests for bacteria and viruses and non-ergonomic furniture.\nConclusion: The priority should be to minimize the risks associated with contact with blood and body fluids. This could involve the implementation of strict safety measures and protocols, as well as providing appropriate personal protective equipment to all personnel who may encounter these fluids.","PeriodicalId":34250,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Health","volume":" 27","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/ijosh.v14i2.53996","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Laboratory workers are often exposed to various risk factors, which can be classified as biological, physical, chemical, psychosocial, and ergonomic. This study aims to conduct a risk analysis in the workers of microbiology and biochemistry laboratories of a branch hospital in Istanbul, Türkiye to identify occupational health and safety risks and provide recommendations for measures to be taken. Methods: The investigators conducted the risk analysis with a five-person team including occupational health and safety experts, a laboratory manager, and technicians. Risk assessments were performed using the L-type matrix 5x5 diagram. The level of risk was determined with the product of probability and severity. Results: Risk analysis in the microbiology laboratory showed ten risk factors. Three of them had moderate level scores as following "working with xylene", “continuous standing work” and "insufficient free space". The remaining risks have low-risk scores, including "working in a noisy environment, "microscope light and ambient light", "working with blood", "working with feces", "non-ergonomic chairs", "insufficient airflow in the environment" and "continuous presence in a closed space". In the biochemistry laboratory, four were classified as moderate risk, including working in constant standing, exposure to bodily fluids, blood tests for bacteria and viruses and non-ergonomic furniture. Conclusion: The priority should be to minimize the risks associated with contact with blood and body fluids. This could involve the implementation of strict safety measures and protocols, as well as providing appropriate personal protective equipment to all personnel who may encounter these fluids.
分院实验室风险分析:L 型矩阵
导言:实验室工作人员经常面临各种风险因素,可分为生物、物理、化学、社会心理和人体工程学等方面。本研究旨在对土耳其伊斯坦布尔一家分院的微生物学和生物化学实验室的工作人员进行风险分析,以确定职业健康和安全风险,并就应采取的措施提出建议:研究人员与包括职业健康与安全专家、实验室经理和技术人员在内的五人小组一起进行了风险分析。风险评估使用 L 型矩阵 5x5 图表进行。风险等级根据概率和严重程度的乘积确定:结果:微生物实验室的风险分析显示有 10 个风险因素。其中,"使用二甲苯工作"、"连续站立工作 "和 "自由空间不足 "这三个风险因素的得分处于中等水平。其余的风险因素得分较低,包括 "在嘈杂的环境中工作"、"显微镜光线和环境光线"、"与血液打交道"、"与粪便打交道"、"不符合人体工学的椅子"、"环境中空气流通不足 "和 "持续处于封闭空间"。在生物化学实验室,有四项被列为中度风险,包括持续站立工作、接触体液、细菌和病毒血液检测以及不符合人体工学的家具:结论:当务之急是尽量减少与血液和体液接触的风险。结论:当务之急是最大限度地降低与血液和体液接触相关的风险,这可能涉及实施严格的安全措施和规程,以及为所有可能接触到这些体液的人员提供适当的个人防护设备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信