3D Printed Cement Composites Testing

Q4 Physics and Astronomy
Denisa Jancarikova, I. Khongová, Petr Bibora, Halina Szklorzova
{"title":"3D Printed Cement Composites Testing","authors":"Denisa Jancarikova, I. Khongová, Petr Bibora, Halina Szklorzova","doi":"10.4028/p-qfstv6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Testing of the properties of cement mortars for 3D printing has not been standardized yet. Manufacturers of dry mixes declares tensile strength and compressive strength, but these properties are determined on standard beams for cement mortars, and their values may differ from the material actually formed by the 3D printing method. Another factor affecting strength is the printing process itself, where different printing machines require different consistencies and therefore different amount of water. Last but not least, it is necessary to take into account the different properties of the printed material depending on the direction of testing. Presented article brings results of determination the compressive strength, flexural tensile strength, splitting tensile strength and uniaxial tensile strength of the cement mortar from 3D printing loaded in different directions in relation to the axis of the print and comparing them with the parameters determined on standard beams made of the same material. A commercially produced dry mixture was used. Rectangular object was printed. Before the actual printing and also the fresh mixture was taken from the print head directly into the molds for the production of standard beams 40×40×160 mm. The printed object and the beams were placed in a water environment after 24 hours and the properties were determined at the age of 28 days. Cubes with dimensions of 40×40×40 mm and beams of 40×40×160 mm were subsequently cut from the printed object. The results of the testing point to a relatively large variability of the strength characteristics not only according to the direction of the load forces, but also in different places of the printed object (samples were taken in the bottom part, in the middle and in top of the printed object). Strengths of the standard beams were significantly higher than strengths of samples cut out from 3D printed object.","PeriodicalId":11306,"journal":{"name":"Defect and Diffusion Forum","volume":" 27","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Defect and Diffusion Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4028/p-qfstv6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Physics and Astronomy","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Testing of the properties of cement mortars for 3D printing has not been standardized yet. Manufacturers of dry mixes declares tensile strength and compressive strength, but these properties are determined on standard beams for cement mortars, and their values may differ from the material actually formed by the 3D printing method. Another factor affecting strength is the printing process itself, where different printing machines require different consistencies and therefore different amount of water. Last but not least, it is necessary to take into account the different properties of the printed material depending on the direction of testing. Presented article brings results of determination the compressive strength, flexural tensile strength, splitting tensile strength and uniaxial tensile strength of the cement mortar from 3D printing loaded in different directions in relation to the axis of the print and comparing them with the parameters determined on standard beams made of the same material. A commercially produced dry mixture was used. Rectangular object was printed. Before the actual printing and also the fresh mixture was taken from the print head directly into the molds for the production of standard beams 40×40×160 mm. The printed object and the beams were placed in a water environment after 24 hours and the properties were determined at the age of 28 days. Cubes with dimensions of 40×40×40 mm and beams of 40×40×160 mm were subsequently cut from the printed object. The results of the testing point to a relatively large variability of the strength characteristics not only according to the direction of the load forces, but also in different places of the printed object (samples were taken in the bottom part, in the middle and in top of the printed object). Strengths of the standard beams were significantly higher than strengths of samples cut out from 3D printed object.
3D 打印水泥复合材料测试
用于 3D 打印的水泥砂浆的性能测试尚未标准化。干混料制造商宣称具有抗拉强度和抗压强度,但这些性能是根据水泥砂浆的标准梁确定的,其数值可能与 3D 打印方法实际形成的材料不同。另一个影响强度的因素是打印过程本身,不同的打印机器需要不同的稠度,因此需要不同的水量。最后但并非最不重要的一点是,根据测试方向的不同,有必要考虑到打印材料的不同特性。本文介绍了三维打印水泥砂浆的抗压强度、挠曲拉伸强度、劈裂拉伸强度和单轴拉伸强度的测定结果,这些强度是在与打印轴线相关的不同方向上加载的,并与相同材料制成的标准梁上测定的参数进行了比较。使用的是市售的干混合物。打印的是矩形物体。在实际打印之前,将新鲜混合物从打印头直接放入用于生产 40×40×160 毫米标准横梁的模具中。24 小时后,将印刷好的物体和横梁置于水环境中,28 天后测定其性能。随后从打印物体上切割出尺寸为 40×40×40 毫米的立方体和 40×40×160 毫米的横梁。测试结果表明,强度特性的变化相对较大,不仅取决于载荷力的方向,还取决于印刷物体的不同位置(在印刷物体的底部、中部和顶部取样)。标准横梁的强度明显高于从三维打印物体上切割下来的样品的强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Defect and Diffusion Forum
Defect and Diffusion Forum Physics and Astronomy-Radiation
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
127
期刊介绍: Defect and Diffusion Forum (formerly Part A of ''''Diffusion and Defect Data'''') is designed for publication of up-to-date scientific research and applied aspects in the area of formation and dissemination of defects in solid materials, including the phenomena of diffusion. In addition to the traditional topic of mass diffusion, the journal is open to papers from the area of heat transfer in solids, liquids and gases, materials and substances. All papers are peer-reviewed and edited. Members of Editorial Boards and Associate Editors are invited to submit papers for publication in “Defect and Diffusion Forum” . Authors retain the right to publish an extended and significantly updated version in another periodical.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信