Reading China's Global Security Initiative Through an International Legal Lens

Ka Lok Yip
{"title":"Reading China's Global Security Initiative Through an International Legal Lens","authors":"Ka Lok Yip","doi":"10.1177/2753412x241240259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Closely related to China's response to Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, the Global Security Initiative (‘GSI’) has attracted attention to its vision on the current international legal order. This essay examines three major themes of the GSI through an international legal lens: common security, sovereign equality and the amorphous idea of ‘legitimate security interest’. Firstly, it highlights the risk that the notion of common security and the related emphasis on ‘major countries’ relationship in the GSI could be abused to justify state oppression of domestic population or major countries’ domination over ‘minor countries’ and proposes a reading to limit these concepts to promoting peace-making efforts led by states, particularly ‘major countries’, with cascading effects on other countries in conflicts. Secondly, it argues that the GSI's re-emphasis on sovereign equality usefully counters unilateralism and should be interpreted not retrospectively to avoid accountability but prospectively to combat impunity for serious violations of international law. Thirdly, it argues that while the notion of legitimate security interest may be irrelevant to the prohibition of the use of force in international relations, it could be a useful consideration in discharging states’ obligation to settle international disputes peacefully.","PeriodicalId":479981,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Transnational Law","volume":" 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Transnational Law","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2753412x241240259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Closely related to China's response to Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, the Global Security Initiative (‘GSI’) has attracted attention to its vision on the current international legal order. This essay examines three major themes of the GSI through an international legal lens: common security, sovereign equality and the amorphous idea of ‘legitimate security interest’. Firstly, it highlights the risk that the notion of common security and the related emphasis on ‘major countries’ relationship in the GSI could be abused to justify state oppression of domestic population or major countries’ domination over ‘minor countries’ and proposes a reading to limit these concepts to promoting peace-making efforts led by states, particularly ‘major countries’, with cascading effects on other countries in conflicts. Secondly, it argues that the GSI's re-emphasis on sovereign equality usefully counters unilateralism and should be interpreted not retrospectively to avoid accountability but prospectively to combat impunity for serious violations of international law. Thirdly, it argues that while the notion of legitimate security interest may be irrelevant to the prohibition of the use of force in international relations, it could be a useful consideration in discharging states’ obligation to settle international disputes peacefully.
从国际法角度解读中国的全球安全倡议
全球安全倡议(GSI)与中国对俄罗斯 2022 年全面入侵乌克兰的反应密切相关,其对当前国际法律秩序的展望引起了人们的关注。本文从国际法的视角审视了全球安全倡议的三大主题:共同安全、主权平等和 "合法安全利益 "这一模糊概念。首先,文章强调了 "全球安全倡议 "中的共同安全概念和对 "大国 "关系的相关强调可能会被滥用于为国家压迫国内民众或大国统治 "小国 "辩护的风险,并建议将这些概念的解读限制在促进由国家(尤其是 "大国")主导的缔造和平的努力,并对冲突中的其他国家产生连带影响。其次,该报告认为,GSI 再次强调主权平等,是对单边主义的有效反击,不应对其进行追溯性解释以避免问责,而应对其进行前瞻性解释,以打击严重违反国际法而不受惩罚的现象。第三,本报告认为,虽然合法安全利益的概念可能与禁止在国际关系中使用武力无关,但在履行国家和平解决国际争端的义务方面,它可能是一个有用的考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信