Application of Machine Learning Modeling for the Upstream Oil and Gas Industry Injury Rate Prediction

Q4 Social Sciences
Desalegn Yeshitila, Daniel Kitaw, M. Belayneh
{"title":"Application of Machine Learning Modeling for the Upstream Oil and Gas Industry Injury Rate Prediction","authors":"Desalegn Yeshitila, Daniel Kitaw, M. Belayneh","doi":"10.3126/ijosh.v14i2.52668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Yearly, the International Labor Organization report indicates many workplace accident occurrences. The degree of the happenings depends on the workplace environment setting and the incident regulatory measures implemented. By the nature of its work environment, the oil and gas upstream sector is susceptible to high incident rates. In the current fierce business competition and practices, improving productivity, quality, and other processes, such as Safety,  is vital. Implementing well-designed safety procedures is the key to managing and reducing the risk level of workplace incidents.\nMethods: Recently, the application of Machine learning (ML) modeling for accident/injury prediction has been reported in the construction, mining, transport, and health sectors. Likewise, the objective of this paper was to implement three machine-learning-based models to predict injury rates in a drilling operation. The petroleum safety authority of Norway provided the datasets. First, the dataset was pre-processed, and then the selected features and target dataset were used for the modeling. Finally, the model prediction and performance accuracy analysis were performed.\nResults: Results showed that multivariable regression (MVR), Random Forest (RF), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) machine learning algorithms-based models predict the test data with R2 values of 0.9576, 0.793, and 0.97036, respectively.\nConclusion: As the common saying goes, 'prevention is better than cure.' For this, implementing methods such as improved work processes and Health, Safety, and  Environment (HSE) mitigation procedures, workplace injuries, and accidents allow for reducing the risk level of workplace injuries. The application of integrated machine learning tools, along with carefully built-in workplace accident database implementation, will provide early detection and possible remedial precautions that can be taken to prevent workplace injuries/accidents/fatalities. However, extensive research and development are required to deploy the method in real life. Combining Machine Learning modeling and carefully designed safety measures is vital for successful and robust predictive tools.","PeriodicalId":34250,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Health","volume":"112 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/ijosh.v14i2.52668","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Yearly, the International Labor Organization report indicates many workplace accident occurrences. The degree of the happenings depends on the workplace environment setting and the incident regulatory measures implemented. By the nature of its work environment, the oil and gas upstream sector is susceptible to high incident rates. In the current fierce business competition and practices, improving productivity, quality, and other processes, such as Safety,  is vital. Implementing well-designed safety procedures is the key to managing and reducing the risk level of workplace incidents. Methods: Recently, the application of Machine learning (ML) modeling for accident/injury prediction has been reported in the construction, mining, transport, and health sectors. Likewise, the objective of this paper was to implement three machine-learning-based models to predict injury rates in a drilling operation. The petroleum safety authority of Norway provided the datasets. First, the dataset was pre-processed, and then the selected features and target dataset were used for the modeling. Finally, the model prediction and performance accuracy analysis were performed. Results: Results showed that multivariable regression (MVR), Random Forest (RF), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) machine learning algorithms-based models predict the test data with R2 values of 0.9576, 0.793, and 0.97036, respectively. Conclusion: As the common saying goes, 'prevention is better than cure.' For this, implementing methods such as improved work processes and Health, Safety, and  Environment (HSE) mitigation procedures, workplace injuries, and accidents allow for reducing the risk level of workplace injuries. The application of integrated machine learning tools, along with carefully built-in workplace accident database implementation, will provide early detection and possible remedial precautions that can be taken to prevent workplace injuries/accidents/fatalities. However, extensive research and development are required to deploy the method in real life. Combining Machine Learning modeling and carefully designed safety measures is vital for successful and robust predictive tools.
将机器学习建模应用于上游石油天然气行业受伤率预测
导言:国际劳工组织的报告显示,每年都有许多工伤事故发生。事故发生的程度取决于工作场所的环境设置和所实施的事故监管措施。由于工作环境的性质,石油和天然气上游行业的事故发生率很高。在当前激烈的商业竞争和实践中,提高生产率、质量和其他流程(如安全)至关重要。实施精心设计的安全程序是管理和降低工作场所事故风险水平的关键:最近,在建筑、采矿、运输和卫生等领域都有应用机器学习(ML)建模进行事故/伤害预测的报道。同样,本文的目的是采用三种基于机器学习的模型来预测钻井作业中的伤害率。挪威石油安全局提供了数据集。首先,对数据集进行预处理,然后将选定的特征和目标数据集用于建模。最后,进行模型预测和性能精度分析:结果表明,基于多元回归(MVR)、随机森林(RF)和人工神经网络(ANN)机器学习算法的模型预测测试数据的 R2 值分别为 0.9576、0.793 和 0.97036:俗话说,"预防胜于治疗"。为此,实施改进工作流程和健康、安全与环境(HSE)缓解程序、工伤和事故等方法可以降低工伤风险水平。综合机器学习工具的应用以及精心建立的工伤事故数据库的实施,将提供早期检测和可能的补救措施,以防止工伤/事故/死亡事故的发生。然而,要在现实生活中部署这种方法,还需要进行广泛的研究和开发。将机器学习建模与精心设计的安全措施相结合,是成功和强大的预测工具的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信