Quality of Life of Patients submitted to Total Knee Arthroplasty

Robson Rocha Da Silva, Silmara Ramos De Souza, Martha Moreira Castro, Marcos Almeida Matos, Diego Ariel de Lima
{"title":"Quality of Life of Patients submitted to Total Knee Arthroplasty","authors":"Robson Rocha Da Silva, Silmara Ramos De Souza, Martha Moreira Castro, Marcos Almeida Matos, Diego Ariel de Lima","doi":"10.12662/2317-3076jhbs.v12i1.4853.p1-9.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: the aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of life between patients who have already undergone the TKA surgery and those who have not. Methodology: 118 patients [60 undergoing TKA (G1) and the remaining 58 awaiting the procedure (G2)] answered questions about QoL using the WOMAC and SF-36 protocols. The comparison was performed using the chi-square test and Student's t-test, with a significance level of 0.05. Results: with regard to clinical aspects, there was a higher level of pain in Group G2, as well as greater frequency in the use of medications, especially for pain relief. In the QoL evaluation, significant difference was observed in all the domains of the generic questionnaire SF-36 and in WOMAC, estando a capacidade functional do G2 reduzida e abaixo do nível observado nos pacientes do G1. Conclusion: patients with advanced knee arthrosis who underwent TKA, compared to those who did not undergo the procedure, had better quality of life in all domains assessed by both the general SF-36 questionnaire and the WOMAC questionnaire.","PeriodicalId":510569,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health & Biological Sciences","volume":"124 36","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health & Biological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12662/2317-3076jhbs.v12i1.4853.p1-9.2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: the aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of life between patients who have already undergone the TKA surgery and those who have not. Methodology: 118 patients [60 undergoing TKA (G1) and the remaining 58 awaiting the procedure (G2)] answered questions about QoL using the WOMAC and SF-36 protocols. The comparison was performed using the chi-square test and Student's t-test, with a significance level of 0.05. Results: with regard to clinical aspects, there was a higher level of pain in Group G2, as well as greater frequency in the use of medications, especially for pain relief. In the QoL evaluation, significant difference was observed in all the domains of the generic questionnaire SF-36 and in WOMAC, estando a capacidade functional do G2 reduzida e abaixo do nível observado nos pacientes do G1. Conclusion: patients with advanced knee arthrosis who underwent TKA, compared to those who did not undergo the procedure, had better quality of life in all domains assessed by both the general SF-36 questionnaire and the WOMAC questionnaire.
接受全膝关节置换术患者的生活质量
目的:本研究旨在评估已接受 TKA 手术的患者和未接受手术的患者的生活质量。方法:118 名患者(60 名正在接受 TKA 手术(G1),其余 58 名正在等待手术(G2))使用 WOMAC 和 SF-36 协议回答了有关生活质量的问题。比较采用卡方检验和学生 t 检验,显著性水平为 0.05。结果:在临床方面,G2 组患者的疼痛程度更高,使用药物的频率也更高,尤其是用于缓解疼痛的药物。在 QoL 评价方面,通用问卷 SF-36 和 WOMAC 的所有领域均存在显著差异,G2 组患者的功能能力降低,低于 G1 组患者的水平。结论:与未接受 TKA 手术的晚期膝关节病患者相比,接受 TKA 手术的晚期膝关节病患者在 SF-36 通用问卷和 WOMAC 问卷评估的所有领域中的生活质量都更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书