PROJECT SAVE: AS A STRATEGY IN IMPROVING LITERACY THROUGH VOCABULARY INTEGRATION AMONG GRADE 8 LEARNERS

Rose Anne Nequinto Calinagan
{"title":"PROJECT SAVE: AS A STRATEGY IN IMPROVING LITERACY THROUGH VOCABULARY INTEGRATION AMONG GRADE 8 LEARNERS","authors":"Rose Anne Nequinto Calinagan","doi":"10.36713/epra16170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to investigate if the vocabulary integration before discussion will be effective in improving literacy level of Grade 8 learners. Specifically, it answered the following research questions: (1) What is the level of the participants performance in the pre-test? (2) What is the level of the participants performance in the post test? (3) Is there a significant difference between the pre-test and post-test of the participants before and after the implementation of the vocabulary integration? (4) Based on the findings, what actions can be planned and implemented to improve the participants literacy level. \nThe participants were 2 groups of Grade 8 learners. They were selected through purposive sampling which entails that the following criteria were met: (1) Grade 8 group of students with the least average in MPS in MELC number one which is Determine the meaning of words and expressions that reflect the local culture by noting context clues. (2) Most members of the class are struggling reader based on Phil-Iri result S.Y 2022-2023. A teacher-made pre-test was administered before presenting this proposed strategy, followed by a posttest after its utilization. Mean (M) and Standard Deviation (SD) were utilized to determine the level of students performance in scaling before and after applying Project SAVE. To determine the significant difference of students literacy level before and after applying Project SAVE, T- test for two dependent means (paired t-test) was used.\nThe results showed that out of 83 students no one got excellent score, 14 very satisfactory and 34 satisfactory score on pretest as compared to posttest, 34 learners achieved excellent score, 35 very satisfactory and 13 satisfactory. The mean score increased significantly from satisfactory to very satisfactory, as well as the standard deviation. Therefore, it can be concluded that the implementation of Project SAVE using SIM has a positive impact on the learners literacy level. Thus, it is recommended for other Grade 8 learners and or other Grade levels.\nKEYWORDS: Project SAVE; Strategy for Learners Literacy Improvement.","PeriodicalId":114964,"journal":{"name":"EPRA International Journal of Research & Development (IJRD)","volume":"109 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EPRA International Journal of Research & Development (IJRD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36713/epra16170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate if the vocabulary integration before discussion will be effective in improving literacy level of Grade 8 learners. Specifically, it answered the following research questions: (1) What is the level of the participants performance in the pre-test? (2) What is the level of the participants performance in the post test? (3) Is there a significant difference between the pre-test and post-test of the participants before and after the implementation of the vocabulary integration? (4) Based on the findings, what actions can be planned and implemented to improve the participants literacy level. The participants were 2 groups of Grade 8 learners. They were selected through purposive sampling which entails that the following criteria were met: (1) Grade 8 group of students with the least average in MPS in MELC number one which is Determine the meaning of words and expressions that reflect the local culture by noting context clues. (2) Most members of the class are struggling reader based on Phil-Iri result S.Y 2022-2023. A teacher-made pre-test was administered before presenting this proposed strategy, followed by a posttest after its utilization. Mean (M) and Standard Deviation (SD) were utilized to determine the level of students performance in scaling before and after applying Project SAVE. To determine the significant difference of students literacy level before and after applying Project SAVE, T- test for two dependent means (paired t-test) was used. The results showed that out of 83 students no one got excellent score, 14 very satisfactory and 34 satisfactory score on pretest as compared to posttest, 34 learners achieved excellent score, 35 very satisfactory and 13 satisfactory. The mean score increased significantly from satisfactory to very satisfactory, as well as the standard deviation. Therefore, it can be concluded that the implementation of Project SAVE using SIM has a positive impact on the learners literacy level. Thus, it is recommended for other Grade 8 learners and or other Grade levels. KEYWORDS: Project SAVE; Strategy for Learners Literacy Improvement.
保存项目:通过词汇整合提高八年级学生读写能力的策略
本研究旨在探讨讨论前的词汇整合是否能有效提高八年级学生的读写水平。具体来说,它回答了以下研究问题:(1)参与者在前测中的表现水平如何? 2)参与者在后测中的表现水平如何? 3)在实施词汇整合前后,参与者的前测和后测是否存在显著差异?(4) 根据研究结果,可以计划和实施哪些行动来提高参与者的读写水平。参与者为两组八年级学生。他们是通过有目的的抽样选取的,即符合以下标准:(1) 八年级的学生,他们的识字率在 MELC 第一项(通过注意上下文线索来确定反映当地文化的词语和表达方式的含义)的 MPS 中平均水平最低。(2) 根据 Phil-Iri 2022-2023 学年的成绩,该班大多数学生在阅读方面有困难。在介绍这一建议的策略之前,进行了教师自制的前测,并在使用后进行了后测。平均值(M)和标准差(SD)被用来确定学生在应用项目 SAVE 前后的成绩水平。结果显示,在 83 名学生中,没有人在前测中获得优异成绩,14 人非常满意,34 人满意;与后测相比,34 名学生获得优异成绩,35 人非常满意,13 人满意。从满意到非常满意,平均分和标准偏差都有明显提高。因此,可以得出结论,利用 SIM 实施 "拯救项目 "对学习者的识字水平产生了积极影响。因此,建议其他八年级学生或其他年级学生也采用该方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信