A multicriteria model for assessing item importance and risk using operational data from military supply chains

Q3 Decision Sciences
Manuel Rossetti, Juliana Bright, Andrew Freeman, Anna Lee, Anthony Parrish
{"title":"A multicriteria model for assessing item importance and risk using operational data from military supply chains","authors":"Manuel Rossetti, Juliana Bright, Andrew Freeman, Anna Lee, Anthony Parrish","doi":"10.1108/jdal-07-2023-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis paper is motivated by the need to assess the risk profiles associated with the substantial number of items within military supply chains. The scale of supply chain management processes creates difficulties in both the complexity of the analysis and in performing risk assessments that are based on the manual (human analyst) assessment methods. Thus, analysts require methods that can be automated and that can incorporate on-going operational data on a regular basis.Design/methodology/approachThe approach taken to address the identification of supply chain risk within an operational setting is based on aspects of multiobjective decision analysis (MODA). The approach constructs a risk and importance index for supply chain elements based on operational data. These indices are commensurate in value, leading to interpretable measures for decision-making.FindingsRisk and importance indices were developed for the analysis of items within an example supply chain. Using the data on items, individual MODA models were formed and demonstrated using a prototype tool.Originality/valueTo better prepare risk mitigation strategies, analysts require the ability to identify potential sources of risk, especially in times of disruption such as natural disasters.","PeriodicalId":32838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Defense Analytics and Logistics","volume":"112 43","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Defense Analytics and Logistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jdal-07-2023-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Decision Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis paper is motivated by the need to assess the risk profiles associated with the substantial number of items within military supply chains. The scale of supply chain management processes creates difficulties in both the complexity of the analysis and in performing risk assessments that are based on the manual (human analyst) assessment methods. Thus, analysts require methods that can be automated and that can incorporate on-going operational data on a regular basis.Design/methodology/approachThe approach taken to address the identification of supply chain risk within an operational setting is based on aspects of multiobjective decision analysis (MODA). The approach constructs a risk and importance index for supply chain elements based on operational data. These indices are commensurate in value, leading to interpretable measures for decision-making.FindingsRisk and importance indices were developed for the analysis of items within an example supply chain. Using the data on items, individual MODA models were formed and demonstrated using a prototype tool.Originality/valueTo better prepare risk mitigation strategies, analysts require the ability to identify potential sources of risk, especially in times of disruption such as natural disasters.
利用军事供应链的业务数据评估项目重要性和风险的多标准模型
目的 本文的动机是需要评估与军事供应链中大量物品相关的风险概况。供应链管理流程的规模给分析的复杂性和执行基于人工(人工分析师)评估方法的风险评估带来了困难。因此,分析人员需要能够自动执行并能定期纳入持续运行数据的方法。设计/方法/途径 在运行环境中识别供应链风险的方法是基于多目标决策分析(MODA)的各个方面。该方法以运营数据为基础,构建供应链要素的风险和重要性指数。这些指数在价值上是相称的,从而为决策提供了可解释的衡量标准。研究结果为分析供应链示例中的项目,开发了风险和重要性指数。原创性/价值为了更好地制定风险缓解战略,分析人员需要具备识别潜在风险源的能力,尤其是在自然灾害等混乱时期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信