(O-24) EFFICACY OF ASPIRATION AND SCLEROTHERAPY FOR HYDROCELE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

F. C. Freitas, M. R. Sanches, AdC Dosatti
{"title":"(O-24) EFFICACY OF ASPIRATION AND SCLEROTHERAPY FOR HYDROCELE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW","authors":"F. C. Freitas, M. R. Sanches, AdC Dosatti","doi":"10.1093/jsxmed/qdae018.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Hydroceles are abnormal collection of fluid between the parietal and visceral layers of the tunica vaginalis. Traditionally, surgical excision and or repair under general anaesthesia has been the standard of care, but sclerosant therapy can be used safely and with efficacy for hydrocele’s treatment. This study aims to review and elucidate the current literature sclerotherapy for hydrocele.\n \n \n \n We searched for articles in Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane evaluating aspiration and sclerotherapy for hydrocele treatment. Search terms were “hydrocele” and “sclerotherapy”. Relevant papers references were full reviewed searching for new articles. The sclerosing agents considered eligle were phenol, tetracycline, sodium tetradecyl sulfate, phenol and alcohol.\n \n \n \n We included 1554 patients from 26 studies. Mean aspirative hydrocele volume was 238,3 mL. Cure rate was seen in 58,3% to 76% after a single procedure in STDS studies and 70% to 94,11% overall success. Phenol’s studies demonstrated a 47.5% to 70% cure rate with one sclerotherapy and 96.5% to 100% overall success. In Sclerotheraphy with tetracycline cure rate after a single procedure was 57% to 100% and overall success was 77% to 100%. Of the polidocanol group, cure rate was 42.3% to 62.1% after one sclerotherapy and overall success was 51.7% to 94%. Finally, in alcohol’s group we found 50% to 76.12% after one procedure and 80% to 97.62%.\n \n \n \n A better cure rate after one procedure was observed with tetracycline and overall success after multiples procedures was seen with phenol. Due to heterogeneity and biases of the studies, more controlled clinical trials must be done to elucidate the best sclerosant agents.\n \n \n \n No conflict.\n","PeriodicalId":377411,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Sexual Medicine","volume":"50 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Sexual Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jsxmed/qdae018.018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hydroceles are abnormal collection of fluid between the parietal and visceral layers of the tunica vaginalis. Traditionally, surgical excision and or repair under general anaesthesia has been the standard of care, but sclerosant therapy can be used safely and with efficacy for hydrocele’s treatment. This study aims to review and elucidate the current literature sclerotherapy for hydrocele. We searched for articles in Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane evaluating aspiration and sclerotherapy for hydrocele treatment. Search terms were “hydrocele” and “sclerotherapy”. Relevant papers references were full reviewed searching for new articles. The sclerosing agents considered eligle were phenol, tetracycline, sodium tetradecyl sulfate, phenol and alcohol. We included 1554 patients from 26 studies. Mean aspirative hydrocele volume was 238,3 mL. Cure rate was seen in 58,3% to 76% after a single procedure in STDS studies and 70% to 94,11% overall success. Phenol’s studies demonstrated a 47.5% to 70% cure rate with one sclerotherapy and 96.5% to 100% overall success. In Sclerotheraphy with tetracycline cure rate after a single procedure was 57% to 100% and overall success was 77% to 100%. Of the polidocanol group, cure rate was 42.3% to 62.1% after one sclerotherapy and overall success was 51.7% to 94%. Finally, in alcohol’s group we found 50% to 76.12% after one procedure and 80% to 97.62%. A better cure rate after one procedure was observed with tetracycline and overall success after multiples procedures was seen with phenol. Due to heterogeneity and biases of the studies, more controlled clinical trials must be done to elucidate the best sclerosant agents. No conflict.
(O-24) 抽吸法和硬化剂注射法治疗鞘膜积液的疗效:系统综述
阴道鞘膜积液是阴道外膜和内膜之间的异常积液。传统的治疗标准是在全身麻醉下进行手术切除和修复,但硬化剂疗法可安全有效地治疗阴道鞘膜积液。本研究旨在回顾和阐明目前硬化剂疗法治疗鞘膜积液的文献。 我们在 Pubmed、Embase 和 Cochrane 中检索了评估抽吸法和硬化剂疗法治疗鞘膜积液的文章。搜索关键词为 "鞘膜积液 "和 "硬化疗法"。对相关论文的参考文献进行了全面审查,以寻找新的文章。符合条件的硬化剂包括苯酚、四环素、十四烷基硫酸钠、苯酚和酒精。 我们纳入了 26 项研究中的 1554 名患者。平均抽吸鞘膜积液量为 238.3 毫升。在 STDS 研究中,单次手术后治愈率为 58.3% 至 76%,总体成功率为 70% 至 94.11%。Phenol 的研究表明,一次硬化剂治疗的治愈率为 47.5% 到 70%,总体成功率为 96.5% 到 100%。在使用四环素的硬化剂治疗中,单次治疗后的治愈率为 57% 至 100%,总体成功率为 77% 至 100%。在多聚甲醛组中,一次硬化剂治疗后的治愈率为 42.3% 至 62.1%,总体成功率为 51.7% 至 94%。最后,在酒精组中,我们发现一次手术后的治愈率为 50%至 76.12%,总治愈率为 80%至 97.62%。 四环素在一次手术后的治愈率较高,苯酚在多次手术后的总体成功率较高。由于研究的异质性和偏差,必须进行更多的临床对照试验,以确定最佳的硬化剂。 无冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信