The role of multiple directorships in minimizing idiosyncratic risk due to the presence of large shareholders: Evidence from Indonesian companies

Q2 Social Sciences
A. My, C. Utama, A. Lubis
{"title":"The role of multiple directorships in minimizing idiosyncratic risk due to the presence of large shareholders: Evidence from Indonesian companies","authors":"A. My, C. Utama, A. Lubis","doi":"10.18488/73.v12i2.3690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to evaluate the role of multiple directorships in the relationship between large shareholders and idiosyncratic risk in Indonesian companies for 2017-2021. The study model included dynamic panel data for estimation and a two-step GMM system to address endogeneity issues. Multiple directorships and long-term shareholders have low-frequency data whereas idiosyncratic risk is associated with high-frequency data. The robustness test employed the Fama-Frenchhee factor model while the single factor model was used to evaluate idiosyncratic risk.  Indonesia adheres to a two-tier system that separates the roles and functions of the board of directors and the board of commissioners. Furthermore, the concentrated ownership structure of Indonesian companies can cause agency problems between large and small shareholders. The study results show that large shareholders can strengthen the relationships of busy directors to reduce idiosyncratic risk. As a result, this research recommends increasing the role of multiple directorships in monitoring and predicting business conditions internally and externally to minimize interference from large shareholders which can cause expropriation due to agency problems.","PeriodicalId":36807,"journal":{"name":"Humanities and Social Sciences Letters","volume":"37 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Humanities and Social Sciences Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18488/73.v12i2.3690","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the role of multiple directorships in the relationship between large shareholders and idiosyncratic risk in Indonesian companies for 2017-2021. The study model included dynamic panel data for estimation and a two-step GMM system to address endogeneity issues. Multiple directorships and long-term shareholders have low-frequency data whereas idiosyncratic risk is associated with high-frequency data. The robustness test employed the Fama-Frenchhee factor model while the single factor model was used to evaluate idiosyncratic risk.  Indonesia adheres to a two-tier system that separates the roles and functions of the board of directors and the board of commissioners. Furthermore, the concentrated ownership structure of Indonesian companies can cause agency problems between large and small shareholders. The study results show that large shareholders can strengthen the relationships of busy directors to reduce idiosyncratic risk. As a result, this research recommends increasing the role of multiple directorships in monitoring and predicting business conditions internally and externally to minimize interference from large shareholders which can cause expropriation due to agency problems.
多董事制在最大程度降低大股东存在导致的特异性风险方面的作用:印度尼西亚公司的证据
本研究旨在评估 2017-2021 年印尼公司大股东与特异性风险关系中多重董事职位的作用。研究模型包括用于估计的动态面板数据和用于解决内生性问题的两步 GMM 系统。多重董事身份和长期股东具有低频数据,而特质风险则与高频数据相关。稳健性检验采用 Fama-Frenchhee 因子模型,而单因子模型则用于评估特异性风险。 印尼实行两级制,将董事会和专员委员会的角色和职能分开。此外,印尼公司集中的所有权结构会导致大股东和小股东之间的代理问题。研究结果表明,大股东可以加强繁忙董事之间的关系,从而降低特异性风险。因此,本研究建议加强多董事制在监督和预测内部和外部经营状况方面的作用,以尽量减少大股东的干扰,因为大股东的干扰可能会因代理问题而导致征用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Humanities and Social Sciences Letters
Humanities and Social Sciences Letters Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信