Acute appendicitis in pregnancy, is there a role for conservative management?

Jane Tian, Tabark Altai, S. Bhatia, Youssef Mourad, Andrew Miele, R. Robitsek, Katherine Mckenzie, Martine A. Louis, N. Mandava
{"title":"Acute appendicitis in pregnancy, is there a role for conservative management?","authors":"Jane Tian, Tabark Altai, S. Bhatia, Youssef Mourad, Andrew Miele, R. Robitsek, Katherine Mckenzie, Martine A. Louis, N. Mandava","doi":"10.18203/2349-2902.isj20240746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Although rare, acute appendicitis is the most common general surgery problem encountered in pregnancy. A chief concern is timely and accurate diagnosis. Traditionally, delayed diagnosis of appendicitis in pregnant patients can quickly lead to appendiceal rupture associated with miscarriage, premature delivery, or even fetal loss. Hence, appendectomy has been the gold standard. However, emerging evidence suggests conservative management may be more effective than previously thought, after accounting for maternal and fetal characteristics.\nMethods: This retrospective study included a sample of pregnant women diagnosed with acute appendicitis presenting for treatment to two hospitals in Queens, NY, between Jan 2012 and Dec 2021. The characteristics, presentation, and outcomes of conservatively versus surgically treated patients were compared.\nResults: The cumulative incidence of acute appendicitis was 0.11% (n=44/28,000). Forty were treated surgically: 78% underwent laparoscopic appendectomy, 15% open appendectomy, and 8% underwent an initial laparoscopy which was converted to an open appendectomy. Four (14%) patients were managed conservatively with IV antibiotics. Eight percent of patients treated surgically had postoperative complications. Neither surgical nor conservatively treated groups reported any instance of mortality or fetal demise.\nConclusions: Our study adds to the literature on treatment decisions for pregnant patients with acute appendicitis. Although surgical intervention remains the gold standard, it carries the potential risk of peri- and postoperative complications. These findings suggest conservative management with antibiotics can sometimes be used without a negative impact on maternal or fetal outcomes.","PeriodicalId":14372,"journal":{"name":"International Surgery Journal","volume":"14 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20240746","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although rare, acute appendicitis is the most common general surgery problem encountered in pregnancy. A chief concern is timely and accurate diagnosis. Traditionally, delayed diagnosis of appendicitis in pregnant patients can quickly lead to appendiceal rupture associated with miscarriage, premature delivery, or even fetal loss. Hence, appendectomy has been the gold standard. However, emerging evidence suggests conservative management may be more effective than previously thought, after accounting for maternal and fetal characteristics. Methods: This retrospective study included a sample of pregnant women diagnosed with acute appendicitis presenting for treatment to two hospitals in Queens, NY, between Jan 2012 and Dec 2021. The characteristics, presentation, and outcomes of conservatively versus surgically treated patients were compared. Results: The cumulative incidence of acute appendicitis was 0.11% (n=44/28,000). Forty were treated surgically: 78% underwent laparoscopic appendectomy, 15% open appendectomy, and 8% underwent an initial laparoscopy which was converted to an open appendectomy. Four (14%) patients were managed conservatively with IV antibiotics. Eight percent of patients treated surgically had postoperative complications. Neither surgical nor conservatively treated groups reported any instance of mortality or fetal demise. Conclusions: Our study adds to the literature on treatment decisions for pregnant patients with acute appendicitis. Although surgical intervention remains the gold standard, it carries the potential risk of peri- and postoperative complications. These findings suggest conservative management with antibiotics can sometimes be used without a negative impact on maternal or fetal outcomes.
妊娠期急性阑尾炎,保守治疗有用吗?
背景:急性阑尾炎虽然罕见,却是妊娠期最常见的普外科问题。及时、准确的诊断是一个主要问题。传统上,妊娠患者阑尾炎的延迟诊断会很快导致阑尾破裂,从而引起流产、早产甚至胎儿死亡。因此,阑尾切除术一直是金标准。然而,新出现的证据表明,在考虑了母体和胎儿的特征后,保守治疗可能比以前认为的更有效:这项回顾性研究纳入了 2012 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间在纽约皇后区两家医院就诊的被诊断为急性阑尾炎的孕妇样本。比较了保守治疗与手术治疗患者的特征、表现和结果:急性阑尾炎的累计发病率为 0.11%(n=44/28,000)。40人接受了手术治疗:78%的患者接受了腹腔镜阑尾切除术,15%的患者接受了开腹阑尾切除术,8%的患者最初接受了腹腔镜手术,后转为开腹阑尾切除术。4名患者(14%)接受了静脉注射抗生素的保守治疗。8%接受手术治疗的患者出现了术后并发症。手术组和保守治疗组均未报告任何死亡或胎儿死亡病例:我们的研究补充了有关急性阑尾炎孕妇治疗决策的文献。尽管手术治疗仍是金标准,但它具有潜在的围手术期和术后并发症风险。这些研究结果表明,使用抗生素进行保守治疗有时不会对母体或胎儿的预后产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信