Improving participation equity in dialogic collaborative problem solving: A participatory visual learning analytical approach

IF 5.1 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Liru Hu, Gaowei Chen, Jiajun Wu
{"title":"Improving participation equity in dialogic collaborative problem solving: A participatory visual learning analytical approach","authors":"Liru Hu,&nbsp;Gaowei Chen,&nbsp;Jiajun Wu","doi":"10.1111/jcal.12975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The existing research on dialogue-based learning and teaching predominantly highlights its capacity to yield productive educational outcomes, yet it often overlooks the pivotal factor of participation equity, which is fundamental to ensuring the efficacy of dialogic teaching and learning.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>In this study, participation equity refers to a condition in which participation itself and opportunities to participate are fairly distributed among participants and all participants are equally listened to and respected. We designed a technology-enhanced participatory visual learning analytical approach to promote equitable participation in dialogic collaborative problem solving from four dimensions: participation (i.e., ensuring equal contributions from all participants), opportunity (i.e., promoting equal engagement with others), responsiveness (i.e., encouraging equal attentiveness and responsiveness to others' input), and respect (i.e., cultivating a respectful communication style).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The intervention class of fourth-grade students (<i>n</i> = 59) interacted with a participatory visual learning analytical tool to reflect on their participation equity and learn productive peer talk moves to address equity issues concerning the four dimensions, while a comparison class (<i>n</i> = 59) only received simple feedback on participation and respect.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The results indicated that equal participation rates among group members were insufficient to secure participation equity. The intervention was effective in helping students realize and address equity-related issues. Intervention students were more equitable regarding responsiveness and participation opportunity than the comparison students.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The proposed multidimensional participation equity framework has the potential to deepen the understanding of equity and promote equitable learning interactions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48071,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning","volume":"40 4","pages":"1632-1657"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcal.12975","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The existing research on dialogue-based learning and teaching predominantly highlights its capacity to yield productive educational outcomes, yet it often overlooks the pivotal factor of participation equity, which is fundamental to ensuring the efficacy of dialogic teaching and learning.

Objectives

In this study, participation equity refers to a condition in which participation itself and opportunities to participate are fairly distributed among participants and all participants are equally listened to and respected. We designed a technology-enhanced participatory visual learning analytical approach to promote equitable participation in dialogic collaborative problem solving from four dimensions: participation (i.e., ensuring equal contributions from all participants), opportunity (i.e., promoting equal engagement with others), responsiveness (i.e., encouraging equal attentiveness and responsiveness to others' input), and respect (i.e., cultivating a respectful communication style).

Methods

The intervention class of fourth-grade students (n = 59) interacted with a participatory visual learning analytical tool to reflect on their participation equity and learn productive peer talk moves to address equity issues concerning the four dimensions, while a comparison class (n = 59) only received simple feedback on participation and respect.

Results

The results indicated that equal participation rates among group members were insufficient to secure participation equity. The intervention was effective in helping students realize and address equity-related issues. Intervention students were more equitable regarding responsiveness and participation opportunity than the comparison students.

Conclusions

The proposed multidimensional participation equity framework has the potential to deepen the understanding of equity and promote equitable learning interactions.

提高对话式协作解决问题过程中的参与公平性:参与式视觉学习分析方法
关于对话式学习和教学的现有研究主要强调其产生富有成效的教育成果的能力,但往往忽略了参与公平这一关键因素,而参与公平是确保对话式教学有效性的根本。在本研究中,参与公平是指参与本身和参与机会在参与者之间公平分配,所有参与者都能平等地倾听和尊重。我们设计了一种技术增强型参与式可视化学习分析方法,从四个方面促进平等参与对话式合作解决问题:参与(即确保所有参与者的平等贡献)、机会(即促进与他人的平等接触)、回应(即鼓励对他人的投入给予平等的关注和回应)和尊重(即培养尊重他人的交流方式)、干预班级的四年级学生(n = 59)与参与式可视化学习分析工具互动,反思他们的参与公平性,并学习富有成效的同伴交谈方法,以解决与四个维度有关的公平问题,而对比班级(n = 59)只获得了关于参与和尊重的简单反馈。干预措施有效地帮助学生认识并解决了与公平相关的问题。建议的多维参与公平框架有可能加深对公平的理解,促进公平的学习互动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
6.00%
发文量
116
期刊介绍: The Journal of Computer Assisted Learning is an international peer-reviewed journal which covers the whole range of uses of information and communication technology to support learning and knowledge exchange. It aims to provide a medium for communication among researchers as well as a channel linking researchers, practitioners, and policy makers. JCAL is also a rich source of material for master and PhD students in areas such as educational psychology, the learning sciences, instructional technology, instructional design, collaborative learning, intelligent learning systems, learning analytics, open, distance and networked learning, and educational evaluation and assessment. This is the case for formal (e.g., schools), non-formal (e.g., workplace learning) and informal learning (e.g., museums and libraries) situations and environments. Volumes often include one Special Issue which these provides readers with a broad and in-depth perspective on a specific topic. First published in 1985, JCAL continues to have the aim of making the outcomes of contemporary research and experience accessible. During this period there have been major technological advances offering new opportunities and approaches in the use of a wide range of technologies to support learning and knowledge transfer more generally. There is currently much emphasis on the use of network functionality and the challenges its appropriate uses pose to teachers/tutors working with students locally and at a distance. JCAL welcomes: -Empirical reports, single studies or programmatic series of studies on the use of computers and information technologies in learning and assessment -Critical and original meta-reviews of literature on the use of computers for learning -Empirical studies on the design and development of innovative technology-based systems for learning -Conceptual articles on issues relating to the Aims and Scope
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信