Clinical results of patients with variceal bleeding and risk analysis of scoring systems

Nuray Yılmaz Çakmak, E. Gemcioğlu, B. Karabuğa, Remzi Ekici, Mehmet Bayraktar, Servet Kocaöz, Osman Ersoy, Selma Karaahmetoğlu
{"title":"Clinical results of patients with variceal bleeding and risk analysis of scoring systems","authors":"Nuray Yılmaz Çakmak, E. Gemcioğlu, B. Karabuğa, Remzi Ekici, Mehmet Bayraktar, Servet Kocaöz, Osman Ersoy, Selma Karaahmetoğlu","doi":"10.32552/2024.actamedica.942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Gastroesophageal varices are a common complication of chronic liver disease and the associated portal hypertension. Gastroesophageal variceal bleeding is the most important cause of mortality in cirrhotic patients, and the risk of developing varices and bleeding significantly increases when hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) exceeds 10-12 mmHg.\nAim: In this study, we aimed to determine the most useful scoring system to assess patients with gastric and esophageal variceal bleeding to guide treatment according to the type of varices, to predict the risk of rebleeding and mortality, and to determine the relationship between types of varices, comorbidities, and mortality.\nResults: We retrospectively analyzed the files of 566 patients who presented to the Emergency Internal Medicine Department with gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Among these, we recruited 117 patients who were diagnosed with varices. Hematemesis and melena were significantly more common in patients with esophageal variceal bleeding compared to patients with gastric variceal bleeding (p=0.025 and p=0.036, respectively) Among the analyzed scoring systems, the Child-Pugh score most successfully predicted mortality with the highest AUC value (AUC: 0.851, 95% CI: 0.770-0.932, p<0.0001).\nConclusion: Assessment with scoring systems upon admission is useful for risk classification and prediction of mortality risk. In this context, the Child-Pugh score can be used to assess acute variceal hemorrhages.","PeriodicalId":7100,"journal":{"name":"Acta Medica","volume":"13 26","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32552/2024.actamedica.942","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Gastroesophageal varices are a common complication of chronic liver disease and the associated portal hypertension. Gastroesophageal variceal bleeding is the most important cause of mortality in cirrhotic patients, and the risk of developing varices and bleeding significantly increases when hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) exceeds 10-12 mmHg. Aim: In this study, we aimed to determine the most useful scoring system to assess patients with gastric and esophageal variceal bleeding to guide treatment according to the type of varices, to predict the risk of rebleeding and mortality, and to determine the relationship between types of varices, comorbidities, and mortality. Results: We retrospectively analyzed the files of 566 patients who presented to the Emergency Internal Medicine Department with gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Among these, we recruited 117 patients who were diagnosed with varices. Hematemesis and melena were significantly more common in patients with esophageal variceal bleeding compared to patients with gastric variceal bleeding (p=0.025 and p=0.036, respectively) Among the analyzed scoring systems, the Child-Pugh score most successfully predicted mortality with the highest AUC value (AUC: 0.851, 95% CI: 0.770-0.932, p<0.0001). Conclusion: Assessment with scoring systems upon admission is useful for risk classification and prediction of mortality risk. In this context, the Child-Pugh score can be used to assess acute variceal hemorrhages.
静脉曲张出血患者的临床结果和评分系统的风险分析
简介胃食管静脉曲张是慢性肝病和相关门脉高压症的常见并发症。胃食管静脉曲张出血是导致肝硬化患者死亡的最重要原因,当肝静脉压力梯度(HVPG)超过 10-12 mmHg 时,发生静脉曲张和出血的风险会显著增加。目的:在这项研究中,我们旨在确定评估胃和食管静脉曲张出血患者最有用的评分系统,以便根据静脉曲张类型指导治疗,预测再出血和死亡风险,并确定静脉曲张类型、合并症和死亡率之间的关系:我们回顾性分析了 566 名因消化道出血到内科急诊就诊的患者的档案。其中,117 名患者被确诊为静脉曲张。在分析的评分系统中,Child-Pugh 评分以最高的 AUC 值(AUC:0.851,95% CI:0.770-0.932,p<0.0001)最成功地预测了死亡率:结论:入院时使用评分系统进行评估有助于进行风险分类和预测死亡风险。在这种情况下,Child-Pugh 评分可用于评估急性静脉曲张出血。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信