Application of two models of non-ideality of sources to increase the accuracy of luminous intensity measurements

IF 0.1 Q4 INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION
Vasyl Balaban, Oleksandr Kupko
{"title":"Application of two models of non-ideality of sources to increase the accuracy of luminous intensity measurements","authors":"Vasyl Balaban, Oleksandr Kupko","doi":"10.24027/2306-7039.1.2024.300948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On the example of experimental studies of the luminous intensity of several light sources, it is shown that there are significant deviations of the luminous intensity dependence from the inverse-square law. Two models for estimating the luminous intensity for non-point light sources are proposed, theoretically studied and experimentally verified: the model of distance refinement and the model of additional sources. \nIn the first model, a constant correction is added to the distance measurement result. It can be determined provided that there is a maximum possible constancy of the estimate of the luminous intensity as the product of the measured illuminance and the square of the measured distance for different distances between the receiver and the source. In this case, the correction is constant, and the estimate of the luminous intensity depends on the distance between the source and the receiver. Alternatively, the luminous intensity and the correction to the measured distance can be determined by minimising the deviations of experimentally measured illuminances at different distances from the calculated ones. In this case, a constant luminous intensity and a constant distance correction are determined. \nThe second model is based on the assumption that deviations from the inverse-square law arise because of additional sources, such as reflections from screens, radiation traps, lamp glass, and others. In this model, the distances between the lamp filament and all additional elements are assumed to be known, and the luminous intensity estimates of additional sources are calculated provided that the deviation between the calculated and measured illuminances at different distances is minimised. \nThe considered models have been experimentally verified. The advantages and disadvantages of the models have been analysed, and recommendations for assessing the quality of the procedure for luminous intensity measurements have been given. Based on these models, it is proposed to develop a procedure that would allow assessing the quality of the installation for luminous intensity measurements.","PeriodicalId":40775,"journal":{"name":"Ukrainian Metrological Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ukrainian Metrological Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24027/2306-7039.1.2024.300948","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On the example of experimental studies of the luminous intensity of several light sources, it is shown that there are significant deviations of the luminous intensity dependence from the inverse-square law. Two models for estimating the luminous intensity for non-point light sources are proposed, theoretically studied and experimentally verified: the model of distance refinement and the model of additional sources. In the first model, a constant correction is added to the distance measurement result. It can be determined provided that there is a maximum possible constancy of the estimate of the luminous intensity as the product of the measured illuminance and the square of the measured distance for different distances between the receiver and the source. In this case, the correction is constant, and the estimate of the luminous intensity depends on the distance between the source and the receiver. Alternatively, the luminous intensity and the correction to the measured distance can be determined by minimising the deviations of experimentally measured illuminances at different distances from the calculated ones. In this case, a constant luminous intensity and a constant distance correction are determined. The second model is based on the assumption that deviations from the inverse-square law arise because of additional sources, such as reflections from screens, radiation traps, lamp glass, and others. In this model, the distances between the lamp filament and all additional elements are assumed to be known, and the luminous intensity estimates of additional sources are calculated provided that the deviation between the calculated and measured illuminances at different distances is minimised. The considered models have been experimentally verified. The advantages and disadvantages of the models have been analysed, and recommendations for assessing the quality of the procedure for luminous intensity measurements have been given. Based on these models, it is proposed to develop a procedure that would allow assessing the quality of the installation for luminous intensity measurements.
应用两种非理想光源模型提高光强测量的准确性
以对几种光源的发光强度进行的实验研究为例,证明发光强度的依赖性与平方反比定律存在显著偏差。本文提出了两种估算非点光源发光强度的模型,并对其进行了理论研究和实验验证:距离细化模型和附加光源模型。在第一个模型中,距离测量结果中加入了一个常数修正。只要在接收器和光源之间的不同距离上,作为测量照度和测量距离平方乘积的光强估计值具有最大可能的恒定性,就可以确定修正值。在这种情况下,校正是恒定的,发光强度的估计值取决于光源和接收器之间的距离。或者,也可以通过最小化不同距离下实验测量光照度与计算光照度的偏差来确定光照强度和测量距离的修正值。在这种情况下,就可以确定恒定的发光强度和恒定的距离修正。第二种模型是基于这样的假设:由于屏幕、辐射陷阱、灯玻璃等的反射等额外来源,会产生与平方反比定律的偏差。在这个模型中,灯丝和所有附加元件之间的距离都是已知的,只要不同距离上的计算照度和测量照度之间的偏差最小,就可以计算出附加光源的光强估计值。所考虑的模型已经过实验验证。对模型的优缺点进行了分析,并提出了评估光强测量程序质量的建议。在这些模型的基础上,建议开发一种程序,用于评估光强测量装置的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ukrainian Metrological Journal
Ukrainian Metrological Journal INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信