ChatGPT versus Bard: A comparative study

Imtiaz Ahmed, M. Kajol, Uzma Hasan, P. P. Datta, Ayon Roy, Md. Rokonuzzaman Reza
{"title":"ChatGPT versus Bard: A comparative study","authors":"Imtiaz Ahmed, M. Kajol, Uzma Hasan, P. P. Datta, Ayon Roy, Md. Rokonuzzaman Reza","doi":"10.1002/eng2.12890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rapid progress in conversational AI has given rise to advanced language models capable of generating human‐like texts. Among these models, ChatGPT and Bard, developed by OpenAI and Google AI respectively, have gained significant attention. With their wide range of functionalities, such as human‐like response generation, proficiency in professional exams, complex problem solving, and more, these models have captured interest. This study presents a comprehensive survey exploring and comparing the capabilities and features of ChatGPT and Bard. We delve into their architectures, training methodologies, performance evaluations, and limitations across various domains. Ethical considerations such as biases and potential misconduct are also examined. Our findings highlight ChatGPT's exceptional performance, positioning it as a leading model. This survey is a vital resource for scholars, innovators, and interested parties operating within the domain of conversational artificial intelligence, offering valuable insights for the advancement of cutting‐edge language models.","PeriodicalId":11735,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/eng2.12890","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rapid progress in conversational AI has given rise to advanced language models capable of generating human‐like texts. Among these models, ChatGPT and Bard, developed by OpenAI and Google AI respectively, have gained significant attention. With their wide range of functionalities, such as human‐like response generation, proficiency in professional exams, complex problem solving, and more, these models have captured interest. This study presents a comprehensive survey exploring and comparing the capabilities and features of ChatGPT and Bard. We delve into their architectures, training methodologies, performance evaluations, and limitations across various domains. Ethical considerations such as biases and potential misconduct are also examined. Our findings highlight ChatGPT's exceptional performance, positioning it as a leading model. This survey is a vital resource for scholars, innovators, and interested parties operating within the domain of conversational artificial intelligence, offering valuable insights for the advancement of cutting‐edge language models.
ChatGPT 与 Bard:对比研究
对话式人工智能的快速发展催生了能够生成类人文本的高级语言模型。在这些模型中,分别由 OpenAI 和谷歌人工智能开发的 ChatGPT 和 Bard 引起了广泛关注。这些模型具有广泛的功能,如生成类人回复、精通专业考试、解决复杂问题等,因此备受关注。本研究对 ChatGPT 和 Bard 的功能和特点进行了全面的探讨和比较。我们深入探讨了它们在不同领域的架构、训练方法、性能评估和局限性。此外,我们还研究了道德方面的考虑因素,如偏见和潜在的不当行为。我们的研究结果凸显了 ChatGPT 的卓越性能,并将其定位为领先模型。这份调查报告对于在会话人工智能领域工作的学者、创新者和相关人士来说是一份重要的资源,为前沿语言模型的发展提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信