Reductions in Hospitalisations and ER visits with Early Antibiotic Initiation in Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Lung Disease

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Kevin Winthrop, Catherine Waweru, M. Hassan, Sara Burns, Matthew Lucci, A. Chatterjee
{"title":"Reductions in Hospitalisations and ER visits with Early Antibiotic Initiation in Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Lung Disease","authors":"Kevin Winthrop, Catherine Waweru, M. Hassan, Sara Burns, Matthew Lucci, A. Chatterjee","doi":"10.1183/23120541.00963-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While antibiotics are recommended for treatment of nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease (NTMLD), the impact of early antibiotic initiation on healthcare resource utilisation (HCRU) is unclear. This study compared HCRU with earlyversusdelayed antibiotic initiation in NTMLD.A retrospective, claims database study (Merative® MarketScan®) of patients diagnosed with NTMLD between 1 July 2015 and 30 June 2019. Patients were divided into early antibiotic initiationi.e., ≤3 months after the first medical claim for NTMLD (index date), and delayed antibiotic initiation groups. Hospitalisations and outpatient visits during a 2-year post-index period were compared to baseline per treatment group; a difference-in-difference analysis compared early and delayed antibiotic initiation groups adjusting for confounding.Of 481 NTMLD treated patients, 364 (76%) and 117 (24%) comprised the early and delayed antibiotic initiation groups, respectively. The early antibiotic initiation group showed significant reductions from baseline in hospitalisations (all-cause, respiratory) and emergency room (ER) visits at follow-up. A significant increase from baseline in mean number of hospitalisations per patient was observed in the delayed antibiotic initiation group in Year 1 post-index. Compared to delayed antibiotic initiation, the early antibiotic initiation group showed significantly greater reductions in all-cause hospitalisations in Years 1 and 2 post-index (relative risk: 0.62 (95% CI: 0.41–0.95) and 0.62 (95% CI: 0.39–0.98), respectively), and in respiratory-related hospitalisations.The early antibiotic initiation group showed significant reductions from baseline in hospitalisations and ER visits over time. Compared to delayed antibiotic initiation, early antibiotic initiation was associated with significantly greater reductions in hospitalisations.","PeriodicalId":11739,"journal":{"name":"ERJ Open Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERJ Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00963-2023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While antibiotics are recommended for treatment of nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease (NTMLD), the impact of early antibiotic initiation on healthcare resource utilisation (HCRU) is unclear. This study compared HCRU with earlyversusdelayed antibiotic initiation in NTMLD.A retrospective, claims database study (Merative® MarketScan®) of patients diagnosed with NTMLD between 1 July 2015 and 30 June 2019. Patients were divided into early antibiotic initiationi.e., ≤3 months after the first medical claim for NTMLD (index date), and delayed antibiotic initiation groups. Hospitalisations and outpatient visits during a 2-year post-index period were compared to baseline per treatment group; a difference-in-difference analysis compared early and delayed antibiotic initiation groups adjusting for confounding.Of 481 NTMLD treated patients, 364 (76%) and 117 (24%) comprised the early and delayed antibiotic initiation groups, respectively. The early antibiotic initiation group showed significant reductions from baseline in hospitalisations (all-cause, respiratory) and emergency room (ER) visits at follow-up. A significant increase from baseline in mean number of hospitalisations per patient was observed in the delayed antibiotic initiation group in Year 1 post-index. Compared to delayed antibiotic initiation, the early antibiotic initiation group showed significantly greater reductions in all-cause hospitalisations in Years 1 and 2 post-index (relative risk: 0.62 (95% CI: 0.41–0.95) and 0.62 (95% CI: 0.39–0.98), respectively), and in respiratory-related hospitalisations.The early antibiotic initiation group showed significant reductions from baseline in hospitalisations and ER visits over time. Compared to delayed antibiotic initiation, early antibiotic initiation was associated with significantly greater reductions in hospitalisations.
非结核分枝杆菌肺病早期使用抗生素可减少住院和急诊就诊人数
虽然推荐使用抗生素治疗非结核分枝杆菌肺病(NTMLD),但早期使用抗生素对医疗资源利用率(HCRU)的影响尚不清楚。本研究比较了非结核分枝杆菌肺病(NTMLD)早期和延迟使用抗生素对医疗资源利用率(HCRU)的影响。这是一项回顾性理赔数据库研究(Merative® MarketScan®),研究对象为2015年7月1日至2019年6月30日期间确诊的非结核分枝杆菌肺病患者。患者被分为早期抗生素启动组(即首次NTMLD医疗索赔(索引日期)后≤3个月)和延迟抗生素启动组。在指数后的 2 年期间,对每个治疗组的住院和门诊量与基线进行比较;在调整混杂因素后,对早期和延迟抗生素使用组进行差异分析比较。在 481 名接受治疗的 NTMLD 患者中,早期和延迟抗生素使用组分别有 364 人(76%)和 117 人(24%)。早期使用抗生素组患者的住院率(全因、呼吸道)和随访时急诊室就诊率与基线相比均有显著下降。在指数发布后的第一年,延迟开始使用抗生素组的每位患者平均住院次数比基线明显增加。与延迟使用抗生素组相比,早期使用抗生素组在指数发布后第1年和第2年的全因住院率明显降低(相对风险分别为0.62(95% CI:0.41-0.95)和0.62(95% CI:0.39-0.98)),呼吸系统相关住院率也明显降低。与延迟使用抗生素相比,早期使用抗生素组的住院率明显降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ERJ Open Research
ERJ Open Research Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
273
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: ERJ Open Research is a fully open access original research journal, published online by the European Respiratory Society. The journal aims to publish high-quality work in all fields of respiratory science and medicine, covering basic science, clinical translational science and clinical medicine. The journal was created to help fulfil the ERS objective to disseminate scientific and educational material to its members and to the medical community, but also to provide researchers with an affordable open access specialty journal in which to publish their work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信