H. Julianti, Trilaksana Nugroho, T. Kesoema, N. Susilaningsih, F. L. Rahmi, Maharani Prizka Pritadesya
{"title":"Effectiveness Of E-Backnshou Exercise To The Improvement Of Neck, Shoulder And Back Pain In Computer Vision Syndrome Patient","authors":"H. Julianti, Trilaksana Nugroho, T. Kesoema, N. Susilaningsih, F. L. Rahmi, Maharani Prizka Pritadesya","doi":"10.36408/mhjcm.v11i1.1017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND : Extra-ocular complaints of Computer Vision Syndrome (CVS) are neck, shoulder, back pain. The 20-20-20 rule and E-BACKNSHOU exercise are expected to improve accommodative mechanisms, ocular surface of the eye and extra ocular symptoms of CVS.\nAIMS : Proving the effectiveness of E-BACKNSHOU exercise for the improvement of neck, shoulder and back pain in CVS patient.\nMETHOD : The research design was Pre-Post Test with Control Design. Subjects were 30 medical students of Faculty of Medicine, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia who experienced CVS and neck, shoulder and back pain. The treatment group got the 20-20-20 rule and E-BACKNSHOU exercise and the control group got the 20-20-20 rule for 1 month. Pain was measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Statistical test was conducted using paired t-test, unpaired t-test and chi square. Value of significance p<0.05.\nRESULT : There were significant differences in VAS score of neck, shoulder, upper back pain (p=0.00), and low back pain (p=0.022) before and after the intervention in the treatment group and VAS score of neck (p=0,002), shoulder (p=0.020), upper back (p=0.011), and low back pain (p=0.019) in the control group. Delta VAS score of the treatment group was greater than the control group and there was a significant difference in delta VAS score of shoulder pain (p=0,030), but there were no significant differences in delta VAS score of neck (p=0,934), upper back (p=0,356), and low back pain (p=0,150).\nCONCLUSION : The effectiveness of 20-20-20 rule and E-BACKNSHOU exercise is better than the 20-20-20 rule alone on treating neck, shoulder and back pain in CVS patient.","PeriodicalId":117574,"journal":{"name":"Medica Hospitalia : Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"105 23","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medica Hospitalia : Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36408/mhjcm.v11i1.1017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND : Extra-ocular complaints of Computer Vision Syndrome (CVS) are neck, shoulder, back pain. The 20-20-20 rule and E-BACKNSHOU exercise are expected to improve accommodative mechanisms, ocular surface of the eye and extra ocular symptoms of CVS.
AIMS : Proving the effectiveness of E-BACKNSHOU exercise for the improvement of neck, shoulder and back pain in CVS patient.
METHOD : The research design was Pre-Post Test with Control Design. Subjects were 30 medical students of Faculty of Medicine, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia who experienced CVS and neck, shoulder and back pain. The treatment group got the 20-20-20 rule and E-BACKNSHOU exercise and the control group got the 20-20-20 rule for 1 month. Pain was measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Statistical test was conducted using paired t-test, unpaired t-test and chi square. Value of significance p<0.05.
RESULT : There were significant differences in VAS score of neck, shoulder, upper back pain (p=0.00), and low back pain (p=0.022) before and after the intervention in the treatment group and VAS score of neck (p=0,002), shoulder (p=0.020), upper back (p=0.011), and low back pain (p=0.019) in the control group. Delta VAS score of the treatment group was greater than the control group and there was a significant difference in delta VAS score of shoulder pain (p=0,030), but there were no significant differences in delta VAS score of neck (p=0,934), upper back (p=0,356), and low back pain (p=0,150).
CONCLUSION : The effectiveness of 20-20-20 rule and E-BACKNSHOU exercise is better than the 20-20-20 rule alone on treating neck, shoulder and back pain in CVS patient.
背景:电脑视觉综合症(CVS)的眼外症状包括颈部、肩部和背部疼痛。 20-20-20法则和E-BACKNSHOU运动有望改善计算机视觉综合症的适应机制、眼表和眼外症状: 证明 E-BACKNSHOU 运动对改善 CVS 患者颈、肩和背部疼痛的有效性。研究对象是印度尼西亚三宝垄市迪波内哥罗大学医学系的 30 名医学生,他们都曾经历过 CVS 和颈肩背疼痛。治疗组采用 20-20-20 法则和 E-BACKNSHOU 运动,对照组采用 20-20-20 法则,为期 1 个月。疼痛用视觉模拟量表(VAS)测量。统计检验采用配对 t 检验、非配对 t 检验和卡方检验。结果:治疗组的颈部、肩部、上背部疼痛(P=0.00)和腰背部疼痛(P=0.022)的 VAS 评分在干预前后有显著差异;对照组的颈部(P=0.002)、肩部(P=0.020)、上背部(P=0.011)和腰背部疼痛(P=0.019)的 VAS 评分在干预前后有显著差异。治疗组的 Delta VAS 评分高于对照组,肩部疼痛的 Delta VAS 评分差异显著(P=0,030),但颈部疼痛的 Delta VAS 评分(P=0,934)、上背部疼痛的 Delta VAS 评分(P=0,356)和腰背部疼痛的 Delta VAS 评分(P=0,150)差异不显著。