The Role of Government Intervention in Mitigating Economic Shocks

Kate Mutoni
{"title":"The Role of Government Intervention in Mitigating Economic Shocks","authors":"Kate Mutoni","doi":"10.47941/ijecop.1763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study sought to explore the role of government intervention in mitigation economic shocks. \nMethodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive’s time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library. \nFindings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to the role of government intervention in mitigating economic shocks. Preliminary empirical review that government intervention plays a crucial role in stabilizing economies during periods of turbulence. Through an exploration of theories such as Keynesian economics, Monetarism, and New Classical Economics, it was found that a balanced approach utilizing both fiscal and monetary policies is effective in responding to economic challenges. Sector-specific impacts were also highlighted, showing that targeted government support, such as subsidies and effective regulation, can enhance resilience in sectors like manufacturing and energy. The study's findings suggest that policymakers should adopt evidence-based strategies to navigate economic uncertainties and promote sustainable growth and stability. \nUnique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Keynesian Economics, Monetarism and the New Classical Economics model may be used to anchor future studies on the role of government intervention in mitigating economic shocks. The study made significant contributions by offering recommendations for policymakers and practitioners. It enhanced economic theory by synthesizing Keynesian economics, Monetarism, and New Classical Economics, providing insights into effective policy responses to economic crises. The study emphasized the importance of targeted government spending, a combination of monetary and fiscal policies, clear guidelines for bailouts, and building economic resilience through diversification and innovation. It also highlighted the need for stable regulatory frameworks, addressing inequality, and taking a holistic approach to policy-making. These recommendations have guided past policy decisions, helping to promote economic stability and resilience. \nKeywords: Government Intervention, Economic Shocks, Keynesian Economics, Monetarism, Fiscal Policy, Monetary Policy","PeriodicalId":512673,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Economic Policy","volume":"130 49","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Economic Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47941/ijecop.1763","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study sought to explore the role of government intervention in mitigation economic shocks. Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive’s time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library. Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to the role of government intervention in mitigating economic shocks. Preliminary empirical review that government intervention plays a crucial role in stabilizing economies during periods of turbulence. Through an exploration of theories such as Keynesian economics, Monetarism, and New Classical Economics, it was found that a balanced approach utilizing both fiscal and monetary policies is effective in responding to economic challenges. Sector-specific impacts were also highlighted, showing that targeted government support, such as subsidies and effective regulation, can enhance resilience in sectors like manufacturing and energy. The study's findings suggest that policymakers should adopt evidence-based strategies to navigate economic uncertainties and promote sustainable growth and stability. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Keynesian Economics, Monetarism and the New Classical Economics model may be used to anchor future studies on the role of government intervention in mitigating economic shocks. The study made significant contributions by offering recommendations for policymakers and practitioners. It enhanced economic theory by synthesizing Keynesian economics, Monetarism, and New Classical Economics, providing insights into effective policy responses to economic crises. The study emphasized the importance of targeted government spending, a combination of monetary and fiscal policies, clear guidelines for bailouts, and building economic resilience through diversification and innovation. It also highlighted the need for stable regulatory frameworks, addressing inequality, and taking a holistic approach to policy-making. These recommendations have guided past policy decisions, helping to promote economic stability and resilience. Keywords: Government Intervention, Economic Shocks, Keynesian Economics, Monetarism, Fiscal Policy, Monetary Policy
政府干预在缓解经济冲击中的作用
目的:本研究旨在探讨政府干预在缓解经济冲击方面的作用。研究方法:本研究采用案头研究方法。案头研究指的是二手数据或无需实地考察即可收集的数据。案头研究基本上是从现有资源中收集数据,因此与实地研究相比,案头研究通常被认为是一种低成本技术,因为主要成本涉及行政人员的时间、电话费和目录。因此,本研究依赖于已出版的研究、报告和统计数据。这些二手数据可通过在线期刊和图书馆轻松获取。研究结果:研究结果表明,在政府干预对缓解经济冲击的作用方面,存在着背景和方法上的差距。初步的经验审查表明,政府干预在动荡时期稳定经济方面发挥着至关重要的作用。通过对凯恩斯主义经济学、货币主义和新古典经济学等理论的探讨发现,利用财政和货币政策的平衡方法可以有效地应对经济挑战。研究还强调了对特定行业的影响,表明政府有针对性的支持,如补贴和有效监管,可以增强制造业和能源等行业的复原力。研究结果表明,政策制定者应采取循证战略来应对经济不确定性,促进可持续增长和稳定。对理论、实践和政策的独特贡献:凯恩斯主义经济学、货币主义和新古典经济学模型可用于今后关于政府干预在缓解经济冲击中的作用的研究。本研究为政策制定者和实践者提供了建议,从而做出了重大贡献。它综合了凯恩斯主义经济学、货币主义和新古典经济学,为有效应对经济危机的政策提供了见解,从而加强了经济理论。该研究强调了有针对性的政府支出、货币和财政政策相结合、明确的救市指导方针以及通过多样化和创新建立经济韧性的重要性。研究还强调了稳定监管框架、解决不平等问题以及采取综合决策方法的必要性。这些建议为过去的政策决策提供了指导,有助于促进经济稳定和恢复力。关键词政府干预、经济冲击、凯恩斯主义经济学、货币主义、财政政策、货币政策
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信