It was better before COVID: The impact of the social relief of distress grant on the lives and livelihoods of South African day labourers in Tshwane

Q2 Social Sciences
Lodewalt Venter, D. Blaauw, C. Claassen
{"title":"It was better before COVID: The impact of the social relief of distress grant on the lives and livelihoods of South African day labourers in Tshwane","authors":"Lodewalt Venter, D. Blaauw, C. Claassen","doi":"10.1111/issj.12497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Persistent high unemployment in South Africa rendered many in the informal economy structurally vulnerable to shocks such as the COVID‐19 pandemic. The social relief of distress (SRD) grant was a government attempt to alleviate the pandemic's fallout. Given the lack of scholarly information on the impact and reach of the SRD grant within the informal economy, particularly on day labourers, this study investigates the impact of the SRD grant on the lives and livelihoods of South African day labourers in Tshwane, South Africa. The study adopted a qualitative research design, utilising in depth interviews, transcription, inductive qualitative coding and thematic analysis. Many day labourers could not access the SRD grant due to, for example the loss or absence of identity documents, and/or lack of Internet access and information on the application process. For those who received it, some pressure relating to the cost of transport and basic needs was alleviated. Occasionally, day labourers use it to supplement other funds to acquire specialised tools. Importantly, the grant was not a disincentive to continue their work‐seeking activities. The findings question the effectiveness of policy responses to economic crises within the informal sector.","PeriodicalId":35727,"journal":{"name":"International Social Science Journal","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Social Science Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/issj.12497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Persistent high unemployment in South Africa rendered many in the informal economy structurally vulnerable to shocks such as the COVID‐19 pandemic. The social relief of distress (SRD) grant was a government attempt to alleviate the pandemic's fallout. Given the lack of scholarly information on the impact and reach of the SRD grant within the informal economy, particularly on day labourers, this study investigates the impact of the SRD grant on the lives and livelihoods of South African day labourers in Tshwane, South Africa. The study adopted a qualitative research design, utilising in depth interviews, transcription, inductive qualitative coding and thematic analysis. Many day labourers could not access the SRD grant due to, for example the loss or absence of identity documents, and/or lack of Internet access and information on the application process. For those who received it, some pressure relating to the cost of transport and basic needs was alleviated. Occasionally, day labourers use it to supplement other funds to acquire specialised tools. Importantly, the grant was not a disincentive to continue their work‐seeking activities. The findings question the effectiveness of policy responses to economic crises within the informal sector.
COVID 之前更好:社会救济金对茨瓦内南非日工生活和生计的影响
南非持续的高失业率使非正规经济中的许多人在结构上很容易受到 COVID-19 大流行病等冲击的影响。社会救济金(SRD)是政府为减轻大流行病的影响而采取的一项措施。鉴于缺乏有关 SRD 补助金对非正规经济,尤其是对日工的影响和范围的学术信息,本研究调查了 SRD 补助金对南非茨瓦内南非日工的生活和生计的影响。本研究采用了定性研究设计,利用了深度访谈、记录、归纳定性编码和主题分析等方法。许多日工由于丢失或没有身份证件,和/或缺乏互联网接入和有关申请程序的信息等原因,无法获得 SRD 补助金。对于那些获得补助的人来说,与交通费用和基本需求有关的一些压力得到了缓解。日工偶尔也会用这笔补助金来补充其他资金,以购买专用工具。重要的是,补助金并没有阻碍他们继续寻找工作。研究结果对非正规部门应对经济危机政策的有效性提出了质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Social Science Journal
International Social Science Journal Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The International Social Science Journal bridges social science communities across disciplines and continents with a view to sharing information and debate with the widest possible audience. The ISSJ has a particular focus on interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary work that pushes the boundaries of current approaches, and welcomes both applied and theoretical research. Originally founded by UNESCO in 1949, ISSJ has since grown into a forum for innovative review, reflection and discussion informed by recent and ongoing international, social science research. It provides a home for work that asks questions in new ways and/or employs original methods to classic problems and whose insights have implications across the disciplines and beyond the academy. The journal publishes regular editions featuring rigorous, peer-reviewed research articles that reflect its international and heterodox scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信