Regulatory Changes and Their Impact on Insurance Market Dynamics

Alice Kavubu
{"title":"Regulatory Changes and Their Impact on Insurance Market Dynamics","authors":"Alice Kavubu","doi":"10.47941/jar.1758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The general purpose of the study was to examine regulatory changes and their impact on insurance market dynamics. \nMethodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive’s time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library. \nFindings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to regulatory changes and their impact on insurance market dynamics. The study concluded that regulatory interventions significantly influenced insurers' strategic decisions and market behavior. It found that compliance with regulatory frameworks enhanced market stability and consumer confidence, but excessive regulatory complexity could stifle innovation. The study emphasized the importance of balancing regulatory objectives with market efficiency and innovation and highlighted the need for adaptive regulatory frameworks to address emerging risks. Overall, the study underscored the critical role of regulatory changes in shaping insurance market dynamics and advocated for collaborative efforts among regulators, industry participants, and stakeholders to promote a competitive, resilient, and inclusive insurance market ecosystem. \nUnique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Institutional theory, Agency theory and Resource Dependence theory may be used to anchor future studies on insurance market dynamic. The study suggested enhancing regulatory transparency and communication to reduce compliance costs and promote market confidence. Additionally, it recommended adopting risk-based and proportionate regulation tailored to insurers' risk profiles and business models. Promoting innovation and market competition through regulatory reforms, along with investing in regulatory capacity and expertise, were also highlighted. These recommendations aimed to foster a dynamic, resilient, and consumer-centric insurance market ecosystem. \nKeywords: Regulatory Changes, Insurance Market Dynamics, Solvency II, Affordable Care Act, GDPR Compliance, Microinsurance Regulations, Risk Management Practices, Market Resilience","PeriodicalId":502929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Actuarial Research","volume":"142 37","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Actuarial Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47941/jar.1758","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The general purpose of the study was to examine regulatory changes and their impact on insurance market dynamics. Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive’s time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library. Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to regulatory changes and their impact on insurance market dynamics. The study concluded that regulatory interventions significantly influenced insurers' strategic decisions and market behavior. It found that compliance with regulatory frameworks enhanced market stability and consumer confidence, but excessive regulatory complexity could stifle innovation. The study emphasized the importance of balancing regulatory objectives with market efficiency and innovation and highlighted the need for adaptive regulatory frameworks to address emerging risks. Overall, the study underscored the critical role of regulatory changes in shaping insurance market dynamics and advocated for collaborative efforts among regulators, industry participants, and stakeholders to promote a competitive, resilient, and inclusive insurance market ecosystem. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Institutional theory, Agency theory and Resource Dependence theory may be used to anchor future studies on insurance market dynamic. The study suggested enhancing regulatory transparency and communication to reduce compliance costs and promote market confidence. Additionally, it recommended adopting risk-based and proportionate regulation tailored to insurers' risk profiles and business models. Promoting innovation and market competition through regulatory reforms, along with investing in regulatory capacity and expertise, were also highlighted. These recommendations aimed to foster a dynamic, resilient, and consumer-centric insurance market ecosystem. Keywords: Regulatory Changes, Insurance Market Dynamics, Solvency II, Affordable Care Act, GDPR Compliance, Microinsurance Regulations, Risk Management Practices, Market Resilience
监管变化及其对保险市场动态的影响
目的:本研究的总体目的是研究监管变化及其对保险市场动态的影响。研究方法:研究采用案头研究方法。案头研究指的是二手数据或无需实地调查即可收集的数据。案头研究基本上是从现有资源中收集数据,因此与实地研究相比,案头研究通常被认为是一种低成本技术,因为主要成本涉及管理人员的时间、电话费和目录。因此,本研究依赖于已出版的研究、报告和统计数据。这些二手数据可通过在线期刊和图书馆轻松获取。研究结果:研究结果表明,在监管变化及其对保险市场动态的影响方面存在背景和方法上的差距。研究认为,监管干预对保险公司的战略决策和市场行为产生了重大影响。研究发现,遵守监管框架可增强市场稳定性和消费者信心,但过度复杂的监管可能会扼杀创新。该研究强调了在监管目标与市场效率和创新之间取得平衡的重要性,并强调有必要建立适应性监管框架,以应对新出现的风险。总体而言,该研究强调了监管变革在塑造保险市场动态方面的关键作用,并倡导监管机构、行业参与者和利益相关者通力合作,促进建立一个具有竞争力、复原力和包容性的保险市场生态系统。对理论、实践和政策的独特贡献:制度理论、代理理论和资源依赖理论可作为未来保险市场动态研究的基础。研究建议加强监管透明度和沟通,以降低合规成本,增强市场信心。此外,研究还建议针对保险公司的风险状况和业务模式,采取基于风险的适度监管。此外,还强调了通过监管改革促进创新和市场竞争,以及投资于监管能力和专业知识。这些建议旨在建立一个充满活力、有韧性、以消费者为中心的保险市场生态系统。关键词监管变化、保险市场动态、偿付能力 II、平价医疗法案、GDPR 合规性、小额保险法规、风险管理实践、市场弹性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信