Antibiotic Alternatives for Controlling Bacterial Infections in Aquaculture

Brian Omolloh
{"title":"Antibiotic Alternatives for Controlling Bacterial Infections in Aquaculture","authors":"Brian Omolloh","doi":"10.47941/ahj.1779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The general purpose of this study was to investigate antibiotic alternatives for controlling bacterial infections in aquaculture. \nMethodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive’s time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library. \nFindings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to antibiotic alternatives for controlling bacterial infections in aquaculture. Preliminary empirical review revealed that various alternative strategies, including probiotics, phage therapy, herbal extracts, and immunostimulants, showed promise in managing bacterial infections and promoting aquaculture sustainability. It emphasized the importance of adopting a multifaceted approach and conducting further research to optimize the efficacy and scalability of antibiotic alternatives. Additionally, interdisciplinary collaboration was highlighted as essential for driving innovation and facilitating the development of sustainable disease management strategies. Overall, the study underscored the urgency of transitioning towards antibiotic alternatives to mitigate risks, promote environmental sustainability, and ensure long-term seafood production viability. \nUnique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Systems theory, Social-Ecological Systems theory and Ecological Resilience theory may be used to anchor future studies on antibiotic alternatives for controlling bacterial infections in aquaculture. This study has contributed significantly to theoretical advancements, practical applications, and policy development. By exploring various theoretical frameworks such as systems theory, social-ecological systems theory, and resilience theory, the research provided insights into the complex dynamics of disease management in aquaculture. Recommendations were made to integrate antibiotic alternatives into holistic disease management strategies tailored to specific aquaculture systems and target species. Practical guidelines were proposed for the selection, formulation, and administration of antibiotic alternatives, while policy recommendations emphasized the need for regulatory frameworks that support sustainable aquaculture practices. Overall, the study informed future research directions and policy initiatives aimed at promoting the responsible use of antibiotic alternatives and enhancing the resilience of aquaculture systems. \nKeywords: Antibiotic Alternatives, Bacterial Infections, Aquaculture, Disease Management, Systems Theory, Social-Ecological Systems Theory, Resilience Theory, Practical Applications, Regulatory Frameworks, Sustainability, Holistic Management, Research Directions","PeriodicalId":439098,"journal":{"name":"Animal Health Journal","volume":"14 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47941/ahj.1779","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The general purpose of this study was to investigate antibiotic alternatives for controlling bacterial infections in aquaculture. Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive’s time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library. Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to antibiotic alternatives for controlling bacterial infections in aquaculture. Preliminary empirical review revealed that various alternative strategies, including probiotics, phage therapy, herbal extracts, and immunostimulants, showed promise in managing bacterial infections and promoting aquaculture sustainability. It emphasized the importance of adopting a multifaceted approach and conducting further research to optimize the efficacy and scalability of antibiotic alternatives. Additionally, interdisciplinary collaboration was highlighted as essential for driving innovation and facilitating the development of sustainable disease management strategies. Overall, the study underscored the urgency of transitioning towards antibiotic alternatives to mitigate risks, promote environmental sustainability, and ensure long-term seafood production viability. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Systems theory, Social-Ecological Systems theory and Ecological Resilience theory may be used to anchor future studies on antibiotic alternatives for controlling bacterial infections in aquaculture. This study has contributed significantly to theoretical advancements, practical applications, and policy development. By exploring various theoretical frameworks such as systems theory, social-ecological systems theory, and resilience theory, the research provided insights into the complex dynamics of disease management in aquaculture. Recommendations were made to integrate antibiotic alternatives into holistic disease management strategies tailored to specific aquaculture systems and target species. Practical guidelines were proposed for the selection, formulation, and administration of antibiotic alternatives, while policy recommendations emphasized the need for regulatory frameworks that support sustainable aquaculture practices. Overall, the study informed future research directions and policy initiatives aimed at promoting the responsible use of antibiotic alternatives and enhancing the resilience of aquaculture systems. Keywords: Antibiotic Alternatives, Bacterial Infections, Aquaculture, Disease Management, Systems Theory, Social-Ecological Systems Theory, Resilience Theory, Practical Applications, Regulatory Frameworks, Sustainability, Holistic Management, Research Directions
控制水产养殖细菌感染的抗生素替代品
目的:本研究的总体目的是调查控制水产养殖中细菌感染的抗生素替代品。研究方法:本研究采用桌面研究方法。案头研究指的是二手数据或无需实地考察即可收集到的数据。案头研究基本上是从现有资源中收集数据,因此与实地研究相比,案头研究通常被认为是一种低成本技术,因为主要成本涉及执行人员的时间、电话费和目录。因此,本研究依赖于已出版的研究、报告和统计数据。这些二手数据可通过在线期刊和图书馆轻松获取。研究结果:研究结果表明,在控制水产养殖细菌感染的抗生素替代品方面存在背景和方法上的差距。初步实证审查显示,各种替代策略,包括益生菌、噬菌体疗法、草药提取物和免疫刺激剂,在控制细菌感染和促进水产养殖可持续性方面显示出前景。它强调了采用多方面方法和开展进一步研究的重要性,以优化抗生素替代品的功效和可扩展性。此外,还强调了跨学科合作对于推动创新和促进可持续疾病管理战略的发展至关重要。总之,该研究强调了向抗生素替代品过渡的紧迫性,以降低风险、促进环境可持续性并确保海产品生产的长期可行性。对理论、实践和政策的独特贡献:系统理论、社会生态系统论和生态恢复力理论可用于今后有关控制水产养殖中细菌感染的抗生素替代品的研究。这项研究为理论进步、实际应用和政策制定做出了重大贡献。通过探索各种理论框架,如系统理论、社会生态系统理论和复原力理论,该研究为水产养殖中疾病管理的复杂动态提供了见解。提出了将抗生素替代品纳入针对特定水产养殖系统和目标物种的整体疾病管理策略的建议。就抗生素替代品的选择、配制和使用提出了实用指南,而政策建议则强调了支持可持续水产养殖实践的监管框架的必要性。总之,这项研究为未来的研究方向和政策措施提供了信息,旨在促进负责任地使用抗生素替代品,提高水产养殖系统的适应能力。关键词抗生素替代品 细菌感染 水产养殖 疾病管理 系统理论 社会生态系统理论 恢复力理论 实际应用 监管框架 可持续性 整体管理 研究方向
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书