with ChatGPT

David Szanto
{"title":"with ChatGPT","authors":"David Szanto","doi":"10.15353/cfs-rcea.v11i1.688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For this Choux Questionnaire, we turned to ChatGPT, the generative AI chatbot. Given the challenges and opportunities that AI presents to academic practice, teaching, and writing, we thought it might be intriguing to use these responses as a means to interpret ChatGPT’s ‘perspectives’ on food through our own. Both the process and outcomes of conducting the questionnaire provided occasions to reflect on the underlying technology, its sources of ‘knowledge’, and its apparent biases. In reading the bot’s words below, a fairly distinct character profile might emerge, as well as a kind of positionality that seems connected to both no place and every place at once. Beyond social and physical geographies, a set of privileges also tends to emerge, one that points to a lack of actual, lived experience. Where are the preferences, quirks, and affect that non-artificial intelligence comprises? Where are the outlier and emotional responses that would make one want to share food or ideas with this being? From your perspective as food scholar, practitioner, eater, or activist, what else do you extrapolate from ChatGPT’s ‘voice’?        ","PeriodicalId":170910,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Food Studies / La Revue canadienne des études sur l'alimentation","volume":"27 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Food Studies / La Revue canadienne des études sur l'alimentation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15353/cfs-rcea.v11i1.688","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For this Choux Questionnaire, we turned to ChatGPT, the generative AI chatbot. Given the challenges and opportunities that AI presents to academic practice, teaching, and writing, we thought it might be intriguing to use these responses as a means to interpret ChatGPT’s ‘perspectives’ on food through our own. Both the process and outcomes of conducting the questionnaire provided occasions to reflect on the underlying technology, its sources of ‘knowledge’, and its apparent biases. In reading the bot’s words below, a fairly distinct character profile might emerge, as well as a kind of positionality that seems connected to both no place and every place at once. Beyond social and physical geographies, a set of privileges also tends to emerge, one that points to a lack of actual, lived experience. Where are the preferences, quirks, and affect that non-artificial intelligence comprises? Where are the outlier and emotional responses that would make one want to share food or ideas with this being? From your perspective as food scholar, practitioner, eater, or activist, what else do you extrapolate from ChatGPT’s ‘voice’?        
使用 ChatGPT
为了完成这份 Choux 问卷,我们求助于人工智能生成聊天机器人 ChatGPT。考虑到人工智能给学术实践、教学和写作带来的挑战和机遇,我们认为将这些回答作为一种手段,通过我们自己的视角来解读 ChatGPT 对食物的 "观点",可能会很有意思。问卷调查的过程和结果都为我们提供了反思底层技术、其 "知识 "来源及其明显偏见的机会。在阅读下面机器人的文字时,我们可能会发现一个相当明显的性格特征,以及一种似乎同时与任何地方和任何地方都有联系的立场。除了社会地理和自然地理之外,还往往会出现一系列特权,这些特权表明人们缺乏实际的生活经验。非人工智能所包含的偏好、怪癖和情感在哪里?让人愿意与之分享食物或想法的离群反应和情感反应在哪里?从你作为美食学者、从业者、食客或活动家的角度来看,你还能从 ChatGPT 的 "声音 "中推断出什么?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信