One Health Approaches to Disease Management

Jones Dembe
{"title":"One Health Approaches to Disease Management","authors":"Jones Dembe","doi":"10.47941/ahj.1777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The general purpose of the study was to explore one health approaches to disease management. \nMethodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive’s time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library. \nFindings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to one health approaches to disease management. Preliminary empirical review revealed that that interdisciplinary collaboration was vital in addressing health challenges at the human-animal-environment interface. Through a comprehensive review of empirical evidence and case studies, the research demonstrated the potential of One Health initiatives to mitigate the burden of infectious diseases, improve health outcomes, and promote sustainable development. Community engagement was highlighted as crucial for identifying health priorities and implementing interventions effectively. Despite challenges such as the need for standardized methodologies and sustainable financing, the study emphasized the importance of continued investment in One Health research and practice to build resilient health systems and promote equity in health outcomes. \nUnique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Complexity theory, Social Ecological model and the Diffusion of Innovations theory may be used to anchor future studies on disease management. The study advocated for interdisciplinary collaboration, complexity theory, and systems thinking to understand health systems better. In practice, these recommendations led to the development and implementation of integrated health interventions, considering the health of humans, animals, and ecosystems. From a policy perspective, they emphasized fostering multi-sectoral collaboration and establishing institutional frameworks to support One Health initiatives. Additionally, the recommendations highlighted the importance of community engagement, investment in research and innovation, and international cooperation to advance One Health agendas and address global health threats. Overall, these recommendations provided valuable guidance for stakeholders in promoting integrated approaches to disease management and improving health outcomes for all.","PeriodicalId":439098,"journal":{"name":"Animal Health Journal","volume":"55 23","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47941/ahj.1777","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The general purpose of the study was to explore one health approaches to disease management. Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive’s time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library. Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to one health approaches to disease management. Preliminary empirical review revealed that that interdisciplinary collaboration was vital in addressing health challenges at the human-animal-environment interface. Through a comprehensive review of empirical evidence and case studies, the research demonstrated the potential of One Health initiatives to mitigate the burden of infectious diseases, improve health outcomes, and promote sustainable development. Community engagement was highlighted as crucial for identifying health priorities and implementing interventions effectively. Despite challenges such as the need for standardized methodologies and sustainable financing, the study emphasized the importance of continued investment in One Health research and practice to build resilient health systems and promote equity in health outcomes. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Complexity theory, Social Ecological model and the Diffusion of Innovations theory may be used to anchor future studies on disease management. The study advocated for interdisciplinary collaboration, complexity theory, and systems thinking to understand health systems better. In practice, these recommendations led to the development and implementation of integrated health interventions, considering the health of humans, animals, and ecosystems. From a policy perspective, they emphasized fostering multi-sectoral collaboration and establishing institutional frameworks to support One Health initiatives. Additionally, the recommendations highlighted the importance of community engagement, investment in research and innovation, and international cooperation to advance One Health agendas and address global health threats. Overall, these recommendations provided valuable guidance for stakeholders in promoting integrated approaches to disease management and improving health outcomes for all.
疾病管理的 "一体健康 "方法
目的:本研究的总体目的是探索一种疾病管理的健康方法。研究方法:研究采用了案头研究方法。案头研究指的是二手数据或无需实地考察即可收集的数据。案头研究基本上是从现有资源中收集数据,因此,与实地研究相比,案头研究通常被认为是一种低成本技术,因为主要成本涉及执行人员的时间、电话费和目录。因此,本研究依赖于已出版的研究、报告和统计数据。这些二手数据可通过在线期刊和图书馆轻松获取。研究结果:研究结果表明,在疾病管理的综合保健方法方面存在着背景和方法上的差距。初步的经验审查显示,跨学科合作对于应对人类-动物-环境界面上的健康挑战至关重要。通过对经验证据和案例研究的全面审查,研究表明了 "一体健康 "倡议在减轻传染病负担、改善健康结果和促进可持续发展方面的潜力。研究强调,社区参与对于确定卫生优先事项和有效实施干预措施至关重要。尽管存在诸如需要标准化方法和可持续融资等挑战,但该研究强调了继续投资于 "一体健康 "研究和实践的重要性,以建立具有复原力的卫生系统并促进卫生成果的公平性。对理论、实践和政策的独特贡献:复杂性理论、社会生态模式和创新扩散理论可用于未来的疾病管理研究。该研究倡导跨学科合作、复杂性理论和系统思维,以更好地理解卫生系统。在实践中,这些建议促成了综合健康干预措施的制定和实施,同时考虑到人类、动物和生态系统的健康。从政策角度看,这些建议强调促进多部门合作,建立支持 "一体健康 "倡议的制度框架。此外,这些建议还强调了社区参与、研究和创新投资以及国际合作对于推进 "一体健康 "议程和应对全球健康威胁的重要性。总之,这些建议为利益攸关方提供了宝贵的指导,以促进疾病管理的综合方法,改善所有人的健康成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书