Revisiting the role of social work in the substantial realization of social rights in local welfare systems: Transforming and changing the rules of the institutional game?

Lore Dewanckel, T. Schiettecat, Koen Hermans, R. Roose, W. Van Lancker, Fabian Kessl, G. Roets
{"title":"Revisiting the role of social work in the substantial realization of social rights in local welfare systems: Transforming and changing the rules of the institutional game?","authors":"Lore Dewanckel, T. Schiettecat, Koen Hermans, R. Roose, W. Van Lancker, Fabian Kessl, G. Roets","doi":"10.1111/spol.13022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although diverse European welfare states have institutionalized an extensive infrastructure of public welfare services to redistribute resources, governments have been confronted with barriers in realizing the social rights of certain groups of citizens. Decentralization and increasingly local welfare provision has been promoted as a strategy to substantially realize social rights. In that sense, the vital role of frontline social work has been stressed in local welfare systems, being considered as dynamic arrangements in which local policymakers and professional social work actors are involved in the substantial realization of social rights. These trends have been frequently studied from a social policy perspective, but the role of professional social work on the frontline level has received much less attention. In this study, we accordingly rely on neo‐institutional theory to explore how frontline social workers employ their professional discretion during processes of local social policy implementation, related to the broader circumstances in which they operate. Our qualitative study aims to tease out whether their strategic actions might transform and/or change the rules of the local institutional game. The qualitative analysis is based on policy documents and qualitative interviews with key actors in two municipalities in Belgium. Our research findings reveal three central fields of tension: (1) Rescaling of responsibilities to the local welfare system and community level versus in‐built spatial concentrations of social problems and inequalities, (2) Efficient local welfare system organization versus wicked social problems, and (3) Fast local welfare system logics versus slow realities.","PeriodicalId":271904,"journal":{"name":"Social Policy & Administration","volume":"18 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Policy & Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.13022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although diverse European welfare states have institutionalized an extensive infrastructure of public welfare services to redistribute resources, governments have been confronted with barriers in realizing the social rights of certain groups of citizens. Decentralization and increasingly local welfare provision has been promoted as a strategy to substantially realize social rights. In that sense, the vital role of frontline social work has been stressed in local welfare systems, being considered as dynamic arrangements in which local policymakers and professional social work actors are involved in the substantial realization of social rights. These trends have been frequently studied from a social policy perspective, but the role of professional social work on the frontline level has received much less attention. In this study, we accordingly rely on neo‐institutional theory to explore how frontline social workers employ their professional discretion during processes of local social policy implementation, related to the broader circumstances in which they operate. Our qualitative study aims to tease out whether their strategic actions might transform and/or change the rules of the local institutional game. The qualitative analysis is based on policy documents and qualitative interviews with key actors in two municipalities in Belgium. Our research findings reveal three central fields of tension: (1) Rescaling of responsibilities to the local welfare system and community level versus in‐built spatial concentrations of social problems and inequalities, (2) Efficient local welfare system organization versus wicked social problems, and (3) Fast local welfare system logics versus slow realities.
重新审视社会工作在地方福利制度中实质性实现社会权利方面的作用:转变和改变机构游戏规则?
尽管欧洲不同的福利国家已将公共福利服务的广泛基础设施制度化,以重新分配资源,但政府在实现某些公民群体的社会权利方面一直面临障碍。权力下放和越来越多地提供地方福利已被作为实质性实现社会权利的战略加以推广。从这个意义上说,一线社会工作在地方福利制度中的重要作用得到了强调,被视为地方决策者和专业社会工作参与者参与实质性实现社会权利的动态安排。这些趋势经常从社会政策的角度进行研究,但专业社会工作在一线的作用却很少受到关注。因此,在本研究中,我们以新制度理论为基础,探讨一线社会工作者在地方社会政策的实施过程中如何运用他们的专业判断力,并将其与他们所处的大环境联系起来。我们的定性研究旨在揭示他们的战略行动是否可能转变和/或改变地方机构的游戏规则。定性分析基于政策文件和对比利时两个城市主要参与者的定性访谈。我们的研究结果揭示了三个存在紧张关系的核心领域:(1) 地方福利制度和社区层面的责任调整与社会问题和不平等现象在空间上的内在集中;(2) 高效的地方福利制度组织与邪恶的社会问题;(3) 快速的地方福利制度逻辑与缓慢的现实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信