Analysis of Surge and Swab ECD of Herschel Bulkley Fluids in Rumaila Iraqi Oil Field

Fatima R. Salih, Farqad A. Hadi, Mortadha T. Al Saba
{"title":"Analysis of Surge and Swab ECD of Herschel Bulkley Fluids in Rumaila Iraqi Oil Field","authors":"Fatima R. Salih, Farqad A. Hadi, Mortadha T. Al Saba","doi":"10.31699/ijcpe.2024.1.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"   Surge and swab pressures are frequently produced during various stages of well construction, including casing running and tripping operations. Managing downhole pressure within the mud window is crucial for mitigating the risks associated with drilling operations including wellbore failure, lost circulation, kicks, and well control issues. The primary objectives of this study are to emphasize the theoretical foundation of surge and swab pressures, forecast the optimum pipe and casing tripping speeds, as well as identify the changes in surge and swab pressures (i.e., equivalent circulating density-ECD) for both open-ended and close-ended drill strings. To achieve these goals, a steady state surge and swab model was used to simulate a case study in the Rumaila oil field, located in Southern Iraq, by utilizing landmark-well plan software. The results of this study support the evidence that the string trip speed plays a substantial role in controlling the swab and surge pressures. It was found that pulling out the 5\" drill string from the 12 1/4\" open hole section drilled with a 9.51 ppg water-based mud at a speed of 10 sec/stand resulted in a swab ECD below the formation pore pressure against all formations, thus resulting in a kick. Moreover, it was found that the annular clearance had a significant impact on the surge and swab ECD whereas the surge ECD at the bit was bigger than that obtained at the previous hole casing shoe. For example, in our case study pulling speeds ranging from 10-190 sec/stand for the 9 5/8\" casing could cause the swab ECD to be below the formation pore pressure gradient at total depth (TD), which is 9.23 ppg. While it was safe to run the same casing through the same interval within 55-190 sec/stand. Furthermore, the results emphasized high trip speeds ranging between 10-30 sec/stand, where for close-ended drill strings, greater surge ECD was observed compared to the open-ended ones. The surge ECD of a 5\" close-ended drill string at 30 sec/stand (60 m/min) at bit was 9.92 ppg, while an open-ended string at the same speed was 9.9 ppg.","PeriodicalId":53067,"journal":{"name":"Iraqi Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering","volume":"41 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iraqi Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31699/ijcpe.2024.1.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

   Surge and swab pressures are frequently produced during various stages of well construction, including casing running and tripping operations. Managing downhole pressure within the mud window is crucial for mitigating the risks associated with drilling operations including wellbore failure, lost circulation, kicks, and well control issues. The primary objectives of this study are to emphasize the theoretical foundation of surge and swab pressures, forecast the optimum pipe and casing tripping speeds, as well as identify the changes in surge and swab pressures (i.e., equivalent circulating density-ECD) for both open-ended and close-ended drill strings. To achieve these goals, a steady state surge and swab model was used to simulate a case study in the Rumaila oil field, located in Southern Iraq, by utilizing landmark-well plan software. The results of this study support the evidence that the string trip speed plays a substantial role in controlling the swab and surge pressures. It was found that pulling out the 5" drill string from the 12 1/4" open hole section drilled with a 9.51 ppg water-based mud at a speed of 10 sec/stand resulted in a swab ECD below the formation pore pressure against all formations, thus resulting in a kick. Moreover, it was found that the annular clearance had a significant impact on the surge and swab ECD whereas the surge ECD at the bit was bigger than that obtained at the previous hole casing shoe. For example, in our case study pulling speeds ranging from 10-190 sec/stand for the 9 5/8" casing could cause the swab ECD to be below the formation pore pressure gradient at total depth (TD), which is 9.23 ppg. While it was safe to run the same casing through the same interval within 55-190 sec/stand. Furthermore, the results emphasized high trip speeds ranging between 10-30 sec/stand, where for close-ended drill strings, greater surge ECD was observed compared to the open-ended ones. The surge ECD of a 5" close-ended drill string at 30 sec/stand (60 m/min) at bit was 9.92 ppg, while an open-ended string at the same speed was 9.9 ppg.
伊拉克鲁迈拉油田赫歇尔 Bulkley 流体的涌流和拭擦 ECD 分析
在油井施工的各个阶段,包括套管运行和跳动作业,经常会产生涌压和拭压。管理泥浆窗口内的井下压力对于降低钻井作业的相关风险至关重要,包括井筒失效、循环损失、卡钻和井控问题。本研究的主要目的是强调涌流和汲水压力的理论基础,预测最佳钻杆和套管跳动速度,以及确定开口式和闭口式钻杆的涌流和汲水压力变化(即等效循环密度-ECD)。为了实现这些目标,利用地标井计划软件,使用稳态涌流和汲汲汲模型模拟了位于伊拉克南部鲁迈拉油田的一个案例研究。研究结果证明,井串移动速度在控制汲水和涌水压力方面起着重要作用。研究发现,在使用 9.51 ppg 水基泥浆钻进的 12 1/4 英寸裸眼井段中,以 10 秒/立的速度拔出 5 英寸钻柱后,针对所有地层的拭子 ECD 都低于地层孔隙压力,从而产生了井眼。此外,研究还发现,环隙对涌流和拭子 ECD 有很大影响,而钻头处的涌流 ECD 要大于上一孔套管鞋处的涌流 ECD。例如,在我们的案例研究中,9 5/8 "套管的拔出速度为 10-190 秒/立,这可能会导致拭子 ECD 低于总深度 (TD) 的地层孔隙压力梯度,即 9.23 ppg。而在 55-190 秒/立位范围内,在同一间隔内使用相同的套管是安全的。此外,结果还显示,在 10-30 秒/立之间的高速运行时,与开口式钻杆相比,闭口式钻杆的涌流蚀刻衰减(ECD)更大。在钻头转速为 30 秒/立(60 米/分)的情况下,5 英寸闭口钻杆的突波 ECD 为 9.92 ppg,而在相同速度下,开口钻杆的突波 ECD 为 9.9 ppg。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信