Information about Tummy Time in infants available on the Internet

Haleigh Locke, Alexis Thomas, Nicole L Stotz, Alexia E Metz
{"title":"Information about Tummy Time in infants available on the Internet","authors":"Haleigh Locke, Alexis Thomas, Nicole L Stotz, Alexia E Metz","doi":"10.1177/00178969241241043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study evaluated Tummy Time recommendations in patient education materials and informal sources found on the Internet. Patient education materials, available from health professionals online, and informal sources, found outside of healthcare, were evaluated for consistency with evidence-informed recommendations. Patient education materials were also evaluated for readability and visual presentation. Twelve sets of patient education materials were included in the top 20 search results. Only one of them addressed all the evidence-informed recommendations accurately. Fifty informal sources were included in analysis, ranging from search rank #1 to #57. Nearly half of the informal sources were judged fully consistent with evidence-informed recommendations. Counter to best practice recommendations, two-thirds of the patient education materials were written above the reading level expected of a student with no more than an elementary school education. All used strategies to enhance clarity, although none met all standards for visual presentation. Although some good resources are available, healthcare providers should exercise caution when selecting or recommending patient education materials online, even when they are available from healthcare professionals. Parents turning to the Internet will find accurate information. However, to develop a comprehensive understanding, they may need to visit multiple sites. Healthcare professionals are responsible for providing or directing their clients to reliable, comprehensive sources of information, and for being aware of the quality of information they may discover through their own searches. Healthcare websites are responsible for communicating clearly and comprehensively with their clients and the public. Some parent education materials require revision for readability, formatting and consistency with Tummy Time recommendations.","PeriodicalId":504537,"journal":{"name":"Health Education Journal","volume":"33 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00178969241241043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluated Tummy Time recommendations in patient education materials and informal sources found on the Internet. Patient education materials, available from health professionals online, and informal sources, found outside of healthcare, were evaluated for consistency with evidence-informed recommendations. Patient education materials were also evaluated for readability and visual presentation. Twelve sets of patient education materials were included in the top 20 search results. Only one of them addressed all the evidence-informed recommendations accurately. Fifty informal sources were included in analysis, ranging from search rank #1 to #57. Nearly half of the informal sources were judged fully consistent with evidence-informed recommendations. Counter to best practice recommendations, two-thirds of the patient education materials were written above the reading level expected of a student with no more than an elementary school education. All used strategies to enhance clarity, although none met all standards for visual presentation. Although some good resources are available, healthcare providers should exercise caution when selecting or recommending patient education materials online, even when they are available from healthcare professionals. Parents turning to the Internet will find accurate information. However, to develop a comprehensive understanding, they may need to visit multiple sites. Healthcare professionals are responsible for providing or directing their clients to reliable, comprehensive sources of information, and for being aware of the quality of information they may discover through their own searches. Healthcare websites are responsible for communicating clearly and comprehensively with their clients and the public. Some parent education materials require revision for readability, formatting and consistency with Tummy Time recommendations.
网上有关婴儿腹部时间的信息
本研究评估了患者教育资料和互联网上非正式资料中的 "肚子时间 "建议。研究评估了医护人员在线提供的患者教育材料和医疗保健以外的非正式来源,以确定它们是否与有实证依据的建议一致。此外,还对患者教育资料的可读性和直观性进行了评估。前 20 项搜索结果中包括 12 套患者教育资料。其中只有一套准确地涵盖了所有循证建议。有 50 份非正式资料被纳入分析,搜索排名从第 1 位到第 57 位不等。近一半的非正式资料被认为完全符合循证医学建议。与最佳实践建议相悖的是,三分之二的患者教育资料的写作水平高于小学文化程度以下学生的阅读水平。所有材料都采用了提高清晰度的策略,但没有一份符合视觉呈现的所有标准。尽管有一些很好的资源,但医疗服务提供者在选择或推荐网上患者教育材料时,即使是医疗专业人士提供的材料,也应谨慎行事。家长在互联网上可以找到准确的信息。但是,为了全面了解信息,他们可能需要访问多个网站。医疗保健专业人员有责任向客户提供或引导客户访问可靠、全面的信息来源,并了解客户通过自己的搜索可能发现的信息的质量。医疗保健网站有责任与客户和公众进行清晰、全面的沟通。一些家长教育材料需要修订,以保证可读性、格式和与 Tummy Time 建议的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信