Comparison of Smartphone Technology using AHP, ELECTRE, and PROMETHEE Methods

A. Akmaludin, A. D. Suriyanto, Nandang Iriadi, Kudiantoro Widianto
{"title":"Comparison of Smartphone Technology using AHP, ELECTRE, and PROMETHEE Methods","authors":"A. Akmaludin, A. D. Suriyanto, Nandang Iriadi, Kudiantoro Widianto","doi":"10.33395/sinkron.v8i2.13085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The progress of smartphone technology is now very rapid, supported by many renewable features, even many users are competing to get the latest products without regard to the costs that have been incurred. The problem that arises is that it is increasingly difficult to select technology-based products with many criteria. The purpose of writing this paper is to provide the best solution for selecting technology-based products with multi-criteria to suit user needs by taking into account the costs incurred effectively and the use of contradictory multi-criteria applications. The presence of technology products always has many criteria that make it more difficult for users to choose products as the right choice according to their needs, thus the right method is needed as a solution to obtain technology-based products such as smartphones. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method is used for the evaluation and selection process. This AHP method will collaborate with the ELECTRE and PROMETHEE methods as a comparison solution for smartphone product selection. The resulting comparison will be an applied model for smartphone selection that produces the best decision-making support according to user needs. The results of the collaborative implementation process of the ELECTRE and PROMETHEE methods provide a decision on the rating system. The collaborative application of the AHP method to the ELECTRE and PROMETHEE methods provides optimal decision support for the selection process, so that this can be used as a comparison material in making decisions regarding the selection of smartphones as technology-based products.","PeriodicalId":34046,"journal":{"name":"Sinkron","volume":"105 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sinkron","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33395/sinkron.v8i2.13085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The progress of smartphone technology is now very rapid, supported by many renewable features, even many users are competing to get the latest products without regard to the costs that have been incurred. The problem that arises is that it is increasingly difficult to select technology-based products with many criteria. The purpose of writing this paper is to provide the best solution for selecting technology-based products with multi-criteria to suit user needs by taking into account the costs incurred effectively and the use of contradictory multi-criteria applications. The presence of technology products always has many criteria that make it more difficult for users to choose products as the right choice according to their needs, thus the right method is needed as a solution to obtain technology-based products such as smartphones. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method is used for the evaluation and selection process. This AHP method will collaborate with the ELECTRE and PROMETHEE methods as a comparison solution for smartphone product selection. The resulting comparison will be an applied model for smartphone selection that produces the best decision-making support according to user needs. The results of the collaborative implementation process of the ELECTRE and PROMETHEE methods provide a decision on the rating system. The collaborative application of the AHP method to the ELECTRE and PROMETHEE methods provides optimal decision support for the selection process, so that this can be used as a comparison material in making decisions regarding the selection of smartphones as technology-based products.
使用 AHP、ELECTRE 和 PROMETHEE 方法比较智能手机技术
现在,智能手机技术的进步非常迅速,在许多可更新功能的支持下,甚至许多用户都在争相购买最新的产品,而不考虑已经产生的成本。随之而来的问题是,如何在众多标准中选择技术型产品变得越来越困难。撰写本文的目的就是通过有效考虑所产生的成本和使用相互矛盾的多标准应用,为以多标准选择技术型产品提供最佳解决方案,以满足用户的需求。科技产品的存在总是有许多标准,这就增加了用户根据自己的需求选择产品的难度,因此需要合适的方法作为获得智能手机等科技产品的解决方案。在评估和选择过程中使用了层次分析法(AHP)。这种 AHP 方法将与 ELECTRE 和 PROMETHEE 方法合作,作为智能手机产品选择的比较解决方案。比较结果将成为智能手机选择的应用模型,根据用户需求提供最佳决策支持。ELECTRE 和 PROMETHEE 方法协同实施过程的结果将为评级系统提供决策支持。将 AHP 方法协同应用于 ELECTRE 和 PROMETHEE 方法,可为选择过程提供最佳决策支持,从而可将其作为选择智能手机这一技术型产品的决策比较材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
204
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信