COMPARISON OF PHENOMENOLOGICAL STUDIES CARRIED OUT IN TURKEY AND THE US

Sibel Toksöz
{"title":"COMPARISON OF PHENOMENOLOGICAL STUDIES CARRIED OUT IN TURKEY AND THE US","authors":"Sibel Toksöz","doi":"10.32570/ijofe.1426681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Phenomenological inquiry, a prominent qualitative research paradigm, has gained momentum in recent years, particularly within educational studies. Despite numerous studies mapping qualitative research or adopting phenomenological designs, comparing the national and international studies utilizing phenomenological design remains under-researched. This study addresses this gap by reviewing 10 theses and dissertations employing phenomenological inquiry, with five conducted in Turkey and five in the US. The inclusion criteria for the studies were adopting a phenomenological research design and having an educational field of interest. No specific timeline or context was set for the inclusion criteria of the studies. The content analysis revealed the similarities and differences between Turkish and American studies in terms of research design, research questions, participant selection, data collection tools, and data analysis. The results showed that both sets of studies had research questions focusing on \"what\" and \"how.\" Both sets of studies employed purposeful or criterion sampling, along with semi-structured interviews as the primary data collection method. Data analysis consistently involved coding transcriptions from interviews. The review concludes by emphasizing the potential benefits of this comparative analysis for novice researchers and graduate students undertaking phenomenological studies.","PeriodicalId":188877,"journal":{"name":"Uluslararası Alan Eğitimi Dergisi","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Uluslararası Alan Eğitimi Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32570/ijofe.1426681","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Phenomenological inquiry, a prominent qualitative research paradigm, has gained momentum in recent years, particularly within educational studies. Despite numerous studies mapping qualitative research or adopting phenomenological designs, comparing the national and international studies utilizing phenomenological design remains under-researched. This study addresses this gap by reviewing 10 theses and dissertations employing phenomenological inquiry, with five conducted in Turkey and five in the US. The inclusion criteria for the studies were adopting a phenomenological research design and having an educational field of interest. No specific timeline or context was set for the inclusion criteria of the studies. The content analysis revealed the similarities and differences between Turkish and American studies in terms of research design, research questions, participant selection, data collection tools, and data analysis. The results showed that both sets of studies had research questions focusing on "what" and "how." Both sets of studies employed purposeful or criterion sampling, along with semi-structured interviews as the primary data collection method. Data analysis consistently involved coding transcriptions from interviews. The review concludes by emphasizing the potential benefits of this comparative analysis for novice researchers and graduate students undertaking phenomenological studies.
土耳其和美国开展的现象学研究比较
现象学探究是一种著名的定性研究范式,近年来发展势头迅猛,尤其是在教育研究领域。尽管有许多研究绘制了定性研究或采用了现象学设计,但对国内外采用现象学设计的研究进行比较的研究仍然不足。本研究针对这一空白,对 10 篇采用现象学探究的论文进行了回顾,其中 5 篇在土耳其进行,5 篇在美国进行。这些研究的纳入标准是采用现象学研究设计并涉及教育领域。研究的纳入标准没有设定具体的时间或背景。内容分析揭示了土耳其和美国研究在研究设计、研究问题、参与者选择、数据收集工具和数据分析方面的异同。结果显示,两组研究的研究问题都侧重于 "是什么 "和 "怎么做"。两组研究都采用了有目的或标准抽样,以及半结构化访谈作为主要的数据收集方法。数据分析始终包括对访谈记录进行编码。综述最后强调了这种比较分析对新手研究人员和从事现象学研究的研究生的潜在益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信