L. Silva, T. Grönstedt, C. Xisto, Luiz Whitacker, C. Bringhenti, M. Lejon
{"title":"Analysis of Blade Aspect Ratio’s Influence on High-Speed Axial Compressor Performance","authors":"L. Silva, T. Grönstedt, C. Xisto, Luiz Whitacker, C. Bringhenti, M. Lejon","doi":"10.3390/aerospace11040276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ratio between blade height and chord, named the aspect ratio (AR), plays an important role in compressor aerodynamic design. Once selected, it influences stage performance, blade losses and the stage stability margin. The choice of the design AR involves both aerodynamic and mechanical considerations, and an aim is frequently to achieve the desired operating range while maximizing efficiency. For a fixed set of aerodynamic and geometric parameters, there will be an optimal choice of AR that achieves a maximum efficiency. However, for a state-of-the-art aero-engine design, optimality means multi-objective optimality, that is, reaching the highest possible efficiency for a number of operating points while achieving a sufficient stability margin. To this end, the influence of the AR on the performance of the first rotor row of a multistage, multi-objective, high-speed compressor design is analyzed. A careful setup of the high-speed aerodynamic design problem allows the effect of the AR to be isolated. Close to the optimal AR, only a modest efficiency variation is observed, but a considerable change in compressor stability margin (SM) is noted. Decreasing the AR allows for increasing efficiency, but at the expense of a reduced surge margin. This allows the designer to trade efficiency for stability. Increasing the AR, however, is shown to reduce both the surge margin and efficiency; hence, a distinct optimality in stability is observed for the analyzed rotor blade row. In this work, optimality in the surge margin with respect to the AR is observed, whereas there is a close to optimal efficiency. The predicted range from AR = 1.10 to AR = 1.64 is only indicative, considering that the definition of multi-objective optimality requires balancing efficiency and the surge margin and that the choice of balancing these two criteria requires making a design choice along a pareto optimal front.","PeriodicalId":505273,"journal":{"name":"Aerospace","volume":"29 27","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aerospace","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11040276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The ratio between blade height and chord, named the aspect ratio (AR), plays an important role in compressor aerodynamic design. Once selected, it influences stage performance, blade losses and the stage stability margin. The choice of the design AR involves both aerodynamic and mechanical considerations, and an aim is frequently to achieve the desired operating range while maximizing efficiency. For a fixed set of aerodynamic and geometric parameters, there will be an optimal choice of AR that achieves a maximum efficiency. However, for a state-of-the-art aero-engine design, optimality means multi-objective optimality, that is, reaching the highest possible efficiency for a number of operating points while achieving a sufficient stability margin. To this end, the influence of the AR on the performance of the first rotor row of a multistage, multi-objective, high-speed compressor design is analyzed. A careful setup of the high-speed aerodynamic design problem allows the effect of the AR to be isolated. Close to the optimal AR, only a modest efficiency variation is observed, but a considerable change in compressor stability margin (SM) is noted. Decreasing the AR allows for increasing efficiency, but at the expense of a reduced surge margin. This allows the designer to trade efficiency for stability. Increasing the AR, however, is shown to reduce both the surge margin and efficiency; hence, a distinct optimality in stability is observed for the analyzed rotor blade row. In this work, optimality in the surge margin with respect to the AR is observed, whereas there is a close to optimal efficiency. The predicted range from AR = 1.10 to AR = 1.64 is only indicative, considering that the definition of multi-objective optimality requires balancing efficiency and the surge margin and that the choice of balancing these two criteria requires making a design choice along a pareto optimal front.
叶片高度与弦长的比值,即纵横比(AR),在压缩机气动设计中起着重要作用。一旦选定,它就会影响阶段性能、叶片损耗和阶段稳定裕度。设计纵横比的选择涉及空气动力学和机械学两方面的考虑,其目的通常是在实现效率最大化的同时达到所需的运行范围。对于一组固定的气动和几何参数,AR 的最佳选择是达到最高效率。然而,对于最先进的航空发动机设计而言,最优化意味着多目标最优化,即在达到足够稳定裕度的同时,尽可能在多个工作点上达到最高效率。为此,我们分析了 AR 对多级、多目标、高速压缩机设计中第一排转子性能的影响。通过对高速空气动力学设计问题的精心设置,可以隔离 AR 的影响。在接近最佳 AR 时,效率变化不大,但压缩机的稳定裕度(SM)却发生了显著变化。减小 AR 可以提高效率,但代价是减少浪涌裕度。这样,设计人员就可以用效率换取稳定性。然而,增加 AR 会降低浪涌裕度和效率;因此,在所分析的转子叶片行中可以观察到明显的稳定性优化。在这项工作中,可以观察到浪涌裕度在 AR 方面的最优性,而效率则接近最优。从 AR = 1.10 到 AR = 1.64 的预测范围只是指示性的,考虑到多目标最优的定义要求平衡效率和浪涌裕度,而平衡这两个标准的选择要求沿着帕累托最优前沿做出设计选择。