Validity Argument for Professional Language Assessment: Evaluating ‘PPSC Test for Recruitment to the Post of Lecturer English’

Memona Mujahid, Dr. Nighat Shakur
{"title":"Validity Argument for Professional Language Assessment: Evaluating ‘PPSC Test for Recruitment to the Post of Lecturer English’","authors":"Memona Mujahid, Dr. Nighat Shakur","doi":"10.47205/plhr.2024(8-i)40","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current research aims to evaluate the validity of the Recruitment Test for Lecturer English (TRLE) conducted by the Punjab Public Service Commission (PPSC). The test scores are used to allocate subject experts to teach English language at degree colleges in Punjab. The researcher follows a mixed-method approach focusing on quantitative data analysis of the five PPSC-TRLEs held between 2013 and 2022. The theories of language test validity informed the validity argument and guided the researcher to devise a tailored analytical framework. The quantitative data analysis and comparison of five tests reveal that it under-represents certain areas of language and exhibits inter-test and intra-test inconsistency. The inclusion of inappropriate and insufficient content leads to invalid test development and unfair decisions. The findings suggest that the test is not flawed for assessing candidates’ language proficiency and predicting their language ability. The study recommends further research to investigate the reliability of the same test and recruitment tests for other subjects.","PeriodicalId":141535,"journal":{"name":"PAKISTAN LANGUAGES AND HUMANITIES REVIEW","volume":"41 29","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PAKISTAN LANGUAGES AND HUMANITIES REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47205/plhr.2024(8-i)40","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current research aims to evaluate the validity of the Recruitment Test for Lecturer English (TRLE) conducted by the Punjab Public Service Commission (PPSC). The test scores are used to allocate subject experts to teach English language at degree colleges in Punjab. The researcher follows a mixed-method approach focusing on quantitative data analysis of the five PPSC-TRLEs held between 2013 and 2022. The theories of language test validity informed the validity argument and guided the researcher to devise a tailored analytical framework. The quantitative data analysis and comparison of five tests reveal that it under-represents certain areas of language and exhibits inter-test and intra-test inconsistency. The inclusion of inappropriate and insufficient content leads to invalid test development and unfair decisions. The findings suggest that the test is not flawed for assessing candidates’ language proficiency and predicting their language ability. The study recommends further research to investigate the reliability of the same test and recruitment tests for other subjects.
专业语言评估的有效性论证:评估 "PPSC 英语讲师职位招聘考试
本研究旨在评估旁遮普公共服务委员会(PPSC)举办的英语讲师招聘考试(TRLE)的有效性。考试成绩用于分配学科专家到旁遮普省的学位学院教授英语。研究者采用混合方法,重点对 2013 年至 2022 年期间举行的五次旁遮普公共服务委员会讲师英语考试(PPSC-TRLE)进行定量数据分析。语言测试有效性理论为有效性论证提供了依据,并指导研究人员设计了一个量身定制的分析框架。对五项测试的定量数据分析和比较显示,它对某些语言领域的反映不足,并表现出测试间和测试内的不一致性。不恰当和不充分的内容导致了无效的测试开发和不公平的决定。研究结果表明,该测试在评估考生的语言水平和预测其语言能力方面没有缺陷。研究建议进一步研究同一测试和其他科目招聘测试的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信