Development of Evaluation Criteria for Training Fire Students to Enable New Rescue Roles in Vietnam

IF 0.7 Q4 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Hung Le Tien, Nam Pham Van, Takaaki Kato
{"title":"Development of Evaluation Criteria for Training Fire Students to Enable New Rescue Roles in Vietnam","authors":"Hung Le Tien, Nam Pham Van, Takaaki Kato","doi":"10.20965/jdr.2024.p0411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The literature on the appropriate education criteria for training young emergency responders in developing countries is scarce. A gap exists between general education and emergency responder education regarding the criteria used for designing education courses and evaluating students. This study reviewed the criteria used at the University of Fire Prevention and Fighting in Vietnam. Although the university had used Bloom’s taxonomy, one of the well-known evaluation criteria for general education programs, in addition to the professional criteria for emergency management, only the bottom three levels of the taxonomy were considered. The authors designed a new training course to prepare and conduct landslide rescue exercises, and applied all six levels of Bloom’s taxonomy to evaluate students’ performance and responses. The course included lectures, an exercise, and a hot debriefing session for 52 third-year students. Consideration of all levels of Bloom’s taxonomy enabled the identification of differences in learning performance between exercise participants and observers among the students. The evaluation results based on the general and professional education criteria differed regarding the performance of students with work experience. This study showed that the full use of Bloom’s taxonomy could help improve firefighters’ training courses. Assessing students from different perspectives using both general and professional education evaluation criteria is important for measuring students’ diverse abilities.","PeriodicalId":46831,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Disaster Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Disaster Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20965/jdr.2024.p0411","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The literature on the appropriate education criteria for training young emergency responders in developing countries is scarce. A gap exists between general education and emergency responder education regarding the criteria used for designing education courses and evaluating students. This study reviewed the criteria used at the University of Fire Prevention and Fighting in Vietnam. Although the university had used Bloom’s taxonomy, one of the well-known evaluation criteria for general education programs, in addition to the professional criteria for emergency management, only the bottom three levels of the taxonomy were considered. The authors designed a new training course to prepare and conduct landslide rescue exercises, and applied all six levels of Bloom’s taxonomy to evaluate students’ performance and responses. The course included lectures, an exercise, and a hot debriefing session for 52 third-year students. Consideration of all levels of Bloom’s taxonomy enabled the identification of differences in learning performance between exercise participants and observers among the students. The evaluation results based on the general and professional education criteria differed regarding the performance of students with work experience. This study showed that the full use of Bloom’s taxonomy could help improve firefighters’ training courses. Assessing students from different perspectives using both general and professional education evaluation criteria is important for measuring students’ diverse abilities.
为越南消防专业学生培训制定评估标准,使其能够胜任新的救援任务
有关发展中国家培训年轻应急响应人员的适当教育标准的文献很少。在设计教育课程和评估学生的标准方面,普通教育和应急响应人员教育之间存在差距。本研究回顾了越南消防大学所使用的标准。尽管该大学除了使用应急管理专业标准外,还使用了布鲁姆分类法--众所周知的普通教育课程评估标准之一,但只考虑了分类法的底三级。作者设计了一门新的培训课程,以准备和进行山体滑坡救援演习,并采用布卢姆分类法的所有六个层次来评价学生的表现和反应。课程包括讲座、演习和热汇报环节,共有 52 名三年级学生参加。考虑到布卢姆分类法的所有层次,能够识别学生中练习参与者和观察者在学习表现上的差异。根据普通教育和专业教育标准得出的评价结果显示,有工作经验的学生的表现有所不同。这项研究表明,充分利用布鲁姆分类法有助于改进消防员培训课程。使用普通教育和专业教育评价标准从不同角度对学生进行评价,对于衡量学生的不同能力非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Disaster Research
Journal of Disaster Research GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
37.50%
发文量
113
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信