Navigating social work practice research challenges: collaboration, participant rights and ethics

Helen Gleeson, L. Allain, H. Hingley‐Jones
{"title":"Navigating social work practice research challenges: collaboration, participant rights and ethics","authors":"Helen Gleeson, L. Allain, H. Hingley‐Jones","doi":"10.1332/27551768y2024d000000011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we discuss the challenges in engaging with research participants from marginalised communities, including from some minority communities where there are interconnecting issues of poverty, racism, school exclusion, family breakdown and sometimes youth crime. This is aligned with experiences of developing research partnerships with local services in evaluation work. Two research case studies, from evaluation research with child and family social work and the youth justice system, discuss experiences of researching within inner-city areas, navigating researcher–practitioner relationships and maintaining ethical research standards. In both cases, entering the research field presented challenges related to sensitivities and distress experienced by participants. Our case-study discussions demonstrate how the researchers responded to risk and unwitting involvement with young people in conflict, in prison and experiencing family bereavement. Highlighted is the vital importance of local agencies providing accurate information about the families and young people that the researchers are asked to contact in order to ensure that respect and research ethics are upheld and no trauma is caused. Planning and building trust are key to ensuring that time is given for respectful engagement and that agencies are ready for ongoing support and follow-up as needed. The article will explore how these methodological considerations can be taken forward.","PeriodicalId":504603,"journal":{"name":"European Social Work Research","volume":"91 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Social Work Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/27551768y2024d000000011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article, we discuss the challenges in engaging with research participants from marginalised communities, including from some minority communities where there are interconnecting issues of poverty, racism, school exclusion, family breakdown and sometimes youth crime. This is aligned with experiences of developing research partnerships with local services in evaluation work. Two research case studies, from evaluation research with child and family social work and the youth justice system, discuss experiences of researching within inner-city areas, navigating researcher–practitioner relationships and maintaining ethical research standards. In both cases, entering the research field presented challenges related to sensitivities and distress experienced by participants. Our case-study discussions demonstrate how the researchers responded to risk and unwitting involvement with young people in conflict, in prison and experiencing family bereavement. Highlighted is the vital importance of local agencies providing accurate information about the families and young people that the researchers are asked to contact in order to ensure that respect and research ethics are upheld and no trauma is caused. Planning and building trust are key to ensuring that time is given for respectful engagement and that agencies are ready for ongoing support and follow-up as needed. The article will explore how these methodological considerations can be taken forward.
驾驭社会工作实践研究挑战:合作、参与者权利和伦理
在这篇文章中,我们讨论了与来自边缘化社区(包括一些少数民族社区)的研究参与者接触所面临的挑战,这些社区存在着贫困、种族主义、学校排斥、家庭破裂以及有时青少年犯罪等相互关联的问题。这与在评估工作中与当地服务机构建立研究伙伴关系的经验是一致的。两项研究案例研究分别来自儿童与家庭社会工作和青少年司法系统的评估研究,讨论了在城市内地区开展研究、处理研究人员与从业人员之间的关系以及保持研究道德标准的经验。在这两种情况下,进入研究领域都会遇到与参与者的敏感性和困扰有关的挑战。我们的案例研究讨论展示了研究人员如何应对风险,以及如何在不知情的情况下与冲突中、监狱中和经历家庭丧亲之痛的年轻人打交道。我们强调了当地机构提供有关研究人员被要求接触的家庭和年轻人的准确信息的极端重要性,以确保尊重和研究伦理得到维护,并且不会造成创伤。制定计划和建立信任是确保有时间进行相互尊重的接触,并确保相关机构随时准备提供持续支持和必要的后续服务的关键。本文将探讨如何推进这些方法上的考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信