Enhancing mathematics education through collaborative digital material design: Lessons from a national project

Q3 Social Sciences
Edith Lindenbauer, Eva-Maria Infanger, Z. Lavicza
{"title":"Enhancing mathematics education through collaborative digital material design: Lessons from a national project","authors":"Edith Lindenbauer, Eva-Maria Infanger, Z. Lavicza","doi":"10.30935/scimath/14323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article offers insights into a national-scale project aimed at developing and disseminating digital learning materials for mathematics education in Austrian lower secondary schools. The design-phase and context of the project outline the noteworthy aspect of this project, namely the close collaboration of a diverse group of experts, including technology-experienced educators, GeoGebra developers, proficient GeoGebra users, and researchers specializing in technology’s role in mathematics education. This approach reveals the various needs and perspectives of all stakeholders for the designing process. To meet these needs the project design is utilizing three different research-related ideas, the didactic tetrahedron, the instrumental approach, and the didactical functionalities provided by digital technologies. We will present the resulting and constantly readjusted workflow and how such collaborative efforts ensure the quality of materials from different perspectives, aligning with best practices in technology integration in mathematics education. The comparison of five carefully selected materials for different learning scenarios brings out various possible technology-added values that can be achieved through collaboration. Selected qualitative methods such as thematic analysis of learning diaries, evaluation of a qualitative questionnaire and analyzing notes from the project team leader during the ongoing project let us extract diverse lessons learned in form of opportunities and drawbacks (e.g., discussions with experts, missing knowledge about GeoGebra). This project exemplifies potential for collaborative material design to enhance mathematics education at a wide scale, offering valuable lessons for similar endeavors in field.","PeriodicalId":36049,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education","volume":"3 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/14323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article offers insights into a national-scale project aimed at developing and disseminating digital learning materials for mathematics education in Austrian lower secondary schools. The design-phase and context of the project outline the noteworthy aspect of this project, namely the close collaboration of a diverse group of experts, including technology-experienced educators, GeoGebra developers, proficient GeoGebra users, and researchers specializing in technology’s role in mathematics education. This approach reveals the various needs and perspectives of all stakeholders for the designing process. To meet these needs the project design is utilizing three different research-related ideas, the didactic tetrahedron, the instrumental approach, and the didactical functionalities provided by digital technologies. We will present the resulting and constantly readjusted workflow and how such collaborative efforts ensure the quality of materials from different perspectives, aligning with best practices in technology integration in mathematics education. The comparison of five carefully selected materials for different learning scenarios brings out various possible technology-added values that can be achieved through collaboration. Selected qualitative methods such as thematic analysis of learning diaries, evaluation of a qualitative questionnaire and analyzing notes from the project team leader during the ongoing project let us extract diverse lessons learned in form of opportunities and drawbacks (e.g., discussions with experts, missing knowledge about GeoGebra). This project exemplifies potential for collaborative material design to enhance mathematics education at a wide scale, offering valuable lessons for similar endeavors in field.
通过合作设计数字教材加强数学教育:国家项目的经验教训
本文介绍了一个旨在开发和推广奥地利初中数学教育数字学习材料的全国性项目。项目的设计阶段和背景概述了本项目值得关注的方面,即不同专家群体的密切合作,包括技术经验丰富的教育工作者、GeoGebra 开发人员、熟练的 GeoGebra 用户以及专门研究技术在数学教育中作用的研究人员。这种方法揭示了设计过程中所有利益相关者的各种需求和观点。为了满足这些需求,项目设计采用了三种不同的研究相关理念,即教学四面体、工具方法和数字技术提供的教学功能。我们将介绍由此产生并不断调整的工作流程,以及这种合作努力如何从不同角度确保教材的质量,并与数学教育中技术整合的最佳实践保持一致。通过比较针对不同学习情景精心挑选的五种教材,我们可以发现通过合作可以实现的各种技术附加值。所选择的定性方法,如对学习日记的专题分析、对定性问卷的评估,以及对项目小组组长在项目进行过程中的笔记的分析,让我们从机遇和弊端(如与专家的讨论、GeoGebra 知识的缺失)中汲取了各种经验教训。该项目体现了合作设计教材的潜力,可在更大范围内提高数学教育水平,为该领域的类似活动提供了宝贵的经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信