Learning clinical reasoning skills during the transition from a medical graduate to a junior doctor

Wcd Karunaratne, M. Chandratilake, Kosala Nirmalani Marambe
{"title":"Learning clinical reasoning skills during the transition from a medical graduate to a junior doctor","authors":"Wcd Karunaratne, M. Chandratilake, Kosala Nirmalani Marambe","doi":"10.29060/taps.2024-9-2/oa3053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The literature confirms the challenges of learning clinical reasoning experienced by junior doctors during their transition into the workplace. This study was conducted to explore junior doctors' experiences of clinical reasoning development and recognise the necessary adjustments required to improve the development of clinical reasoning skills. \nMethods: A hermeneutic phenomenological study was conducted using multiple methods of data collection, including semi-structured and narrative interviews (n=18) and post-consultation discussions (n=48). All interviews and post-consultation discussions were analysed to generate themes and identify patterns and associations to explain the dataset.\nResults: During the transition, junior doctors’ approach to clinical reasoning changed from a ‘disease-oriented’ to a ‘practice-oriented’ approach, giving rise to the ‘Practice-oriented clinical skills development framework’ helpful in developing clinical reasoning skills. The freedom to reason within a supportive work environment, the trainees’ emotional commitment to patient care, and their early integration into the healthcare team were identified as particularly supportive. The service-oriented nature of the internship, the interrupted supervisory relationships, and early exposure to acute care settings posed challenges for learning clinical reasoning. These findings highlighted the clinical teachers' role, possible teaching strategies, and the specific changes required at the system level to develop clinical reasoning skills among junior doctors. \nConclusion: The ‘Practice-oriented clinical skills development framework’ is a valuable reference point for clinical teachers to facilitate the development of clinical reasoning skills among junior doctors. In addition, this research has provided insights into the responsibilities of clinical teachers, teaching strategies, and the system-related changes that may be necessary to facilitate this process. \n\nKeywords: Clinical Reasoning, Medical Decision Making, Medical Graduates, Junior Doctor Transition, Hermeneutic Phenomenology, Qualitative Research","PeriodicalId":494652,"journal":{"name":"The Asia Pacific Scholar","volume":"37 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Asia Pacific Scholar","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29060/taps.2024-9-2/oa3053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The literature confirms the challenges of learning clinical reasoning experienced by junior doctors during their transition into the workplace. This study was conducted to explore junior doctors' experiences of clinical reasoning development and recognise the necessary adjustments required to improve the development of clinical reasoning skills. Methods: A hermeneutic phenomenological study was conducted using multiple methods of data collection, including semi-structured and narrative interviews (n=18) and post-consultation discussions (n=48). All interviews and post-consultation discussions were analysed to generate themes and identify patterns and associations to explain the dataset. Results: During the transition, junior doctors’ approach to clinical reasoning changed from a ‘disease-oriented’ to a ‘practice-oriented’ approach, giving rise to the ‘Practice-oriented clinical skills development framework’ helpful in developing clinical reasoning skills. The freedom to reason within a supportive work environment, the trainees’ emotional commitment to patient care, and their early integration into the healthcare team were identified as particularly supportive. The service-oriented nature of the internship, the interrupted supervisory relationships, and early exposure to acute care settings posed challenges for learning clinical reasoning. These findings highlighted the clinical teachers' role, possible teaching strategies, and the specific changes required at the system level to develop clinical reasoning skills among junior doctors. Conclusion: The ‘Practice-oriented clinical skills development framework’ is a valuable reference point for clinical teachers to facilitate the development of clinical reasoning skills among junior doctors. In addition, this research has provided insights into the responsibilities of clinical teachers, teaching strategies, and the system-related changes that may be necessary to facilitate this process. Keywords: Clinical Reasoning, Medical Decision Making, Medical Graduates, Junior Doctor Transition, Hermeneutic Phenomenology, Qualitative Research
在从医学毕业生向初级医生过渡的过程中学习临床推理技能
导言:文献证实,初级医生在进入职场后的临床推理学习过程中会遇到各种挑战。本研究旨在探讨低年资医生在临床推理能力培养方面的经验,并认识到提高临床推理能力培养所需的必要调整。研究方法采用多种方法收集数据,包括半结构式和叙事式访谈(18 人)以及诊后讨论(48 人),进行了诠释学现象学研究。对所有访谈和会诊后讨论进行了分析,以产生主题并确定模式和关联,从而解释数据集:在过渡期间,初级医生的临床推理方法从 "以疾病为导向 "转变为 "以实践为导向",从而产生了 "以实践为导向的临床技能发展框架",该框架有助于发展临床推理技能。在支持性的工作环境中自由推理、受训人员对病人护理的情感投入以及他们尽早融入医疗团队被认为是特别有帮助的因素。实习以服务为导向的性质、中断的指导关系以及过早接触急症护理环境对学习临床推理提出了挑战。这些发现强调了临床教师的作用、可能的教学策略,以及为培养初级医生的临床推理能力而需要在系统层面做出的具体改变。结论以实践为导向的临床技能发展框架 "是临床教师促进初级医生临床推理技能发展的重要参考点。此外,本研究还对临床教师的职责、教学策略以及为促进这一过程而可能需要进行的与制度相关的变革提供了启示。关键词临床推理、医疗决策、医学毕业生、初级医生过渡、诠释现象学、定性研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信