Perceptions of the learning environment in ophthalmology residency training: A mixed method study

Muhammad Irfan Kamaruddin, Andi Alfian Zainuddin, B. Nelwan, Sri Asriyani, Firdaus Hamid, Tenri Esa, Irawan Yusuf
{"title":"Perceptions of the learning environment in ophthalmology residency training: A mixed method study","authors":"Muhammad Irfan Kamaruddin, Andi Alfian Zainuddin, B. Nelwan, Sri Asriyani, Firdaus Hamid, Tenri Esa, Irawan Yusuf","doi":"10.29060/taps.2024-9-2/oa3074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: A good learning environment (LE) will affect the quality and standard of the learning process, student performance, and the outcome of the curriculum as well as predictor of the quality of health services. Our study aims to assess residents’ perception of the LE in Ophthalmology training programs for future improvement.\nMethods: Mixed method with an explanatory sequential design was implemented in this study using the Post-graduate Hospital Educational Environment Measure (PHEEM) as a quantitative approach and open-ended questions collaborated with focus group discussion (FGD) as a qualitative measurement. A comparison of the quantitative data was made using parametric and non-parametric analyses. Thematic analyses were performed for qualitative data. Integration of quantitative and qualitative data was done by connecting both data.\nResults: Fifty-three residents participated in this survey. The mean age was 30.96±2.18 years old, 64.15% were female and 77.36% are at the internship stage. The mean score of overall PHEEM was 123.40 ±12.35, indicated an excellent LE, while the mean score of perceptions of role autonomy, perceptions of teaching, and perceptions of social support were 42.57±4.62, 47.75±4.84 and 33.08±4.15, respectively. There is no significant difference between gender and study period with the perception of LE. Thematic analysis from qualitative data reveals six positive and five negative perception themes. All discovered themes confirmed concordance with the result of LE perception.\nConclusion: Learning environment perception in the ophthalmology residency program was excellent and essential for the student's skills and performance quality. Some specific areas still need improvement strategies for institutional development.\n\nKeywords: Learning Environment, PHEEM, Ophthalmology, Residency, Mixed Method","PeriodicalId":494652,"journal":{"name":"The Asia Pacific Scholar","volume":"24 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Asia Pacific Scholar","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29060/taps.2024-9-2/oa3074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: A good learning environment (LE) will affect the quality and standard of the learning process, student performance, and the outcome of the curriculum as well as predictor of the quality of health services. Our study aims to assess residents’ perception of the LE in Ophthalmology training programs for future improvement. Methods: Mixed method with an explanatory sequential design was implemented in this study using the Post-graduate Hospital Educational Environment Measure (PHEEM) as a quantitative approach and open-ended questions collaborated with focus group discussion (FGD) as a qualitative measurement. A comparison of the quantitative data was made using parametric and non-parametric analyses. Thematic analyses were performed for qualitative data. Integration of quantitative and qualitative data was done by connecting both data. Results: Fifty-three residents participated in this survey. The mean age was 30.96±2.18 years old, 64.15% were female and 77.36% are at the internship stage. The mean score of overall PHEEM was 123.40 ±12.35, indicated an excellent LE, while the mean score of perceptions of role autonomy, perceptions of teaching, and perceptions of social support were 42.57±4.62, 47.75±4.84 and 33.08±4.15, respectively. There is no significant difference between gender and study period with the perception of LE. Thematic analysis from qualitative data reveals six positive and five negative perception themes. All discovered themes confirmed concordance with the result of LE perception. Conclusion: Learning environment perception in the ophthalmology residency program was excellent and essential for the student's skills and performance quality. Some specific areas still need improvement strategies for institutional development. Keywords: Learning Environment, PHEEM, Ophthalmology, Residency, Mixed Method
对眼科住院医师培训学习环境的看法:混合方法研究
导言:良好的学习环境(LE)将影响学习过程的质量和标准、学生的表现、课程的成果以及医疗服务质量的预测。我们的研究旨在评估住院医师对眼科培训项目中学习环境的看法,以便今后加以改进:本研究采用解释性顺序设计的混合方法,以研究生医院教育环境测量(PHEEM)作为定量方法,以开放式问题和焦点小组讨论(FGD)作为定性测量方法。使用参数分析和非参数分析对定量数据进行了比较。对定性数据进行了专题分析。通过将定量数据和定性数据连接起来,实现了定量数据和定性数据的整合:53 名居民参与了此次调查。平均年龄为(30.96±2.18)岁,64.15%为女性,77.36%处于实习阶段。PHEEM总分的平均值为(123.40±12.35)分,LE为优;角色自主感、教学感和社会支持感的平均值分别为(42.57±4.62)分、(47.75±4.84)分和(33.08±4.15)分。性别和学习阶段对 LE 的感知没有明显差异。定性数据的主题分析显示了 6 个积极和 5 个消极的认知主题。所有发现的主题都与学习环境感知结果一致:结论:眼科住院医师培训项目中的学习环境感知非常好,对学生的技能和表现质量至关重要。结论:眼科住院医师培训项目的学习环境感知非常好,对学生的技能和表现质量至关重要,但仍有一些特定领域需要改进策略,以促进机构发展:学习环境 PHEEM 眼科 住院医师 混合方法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信