Can a virtual human increase mindfulness and reduce stress? A randomised trial

Mariam Karhiy , Mark Sagar , Michael Antoni , Kate Loveys , Elizabeth Broadbent
{"title":"Can a virtual human increase mindfulness and reduce stress? A randomised trial","authors":"Mariam Karhiy ,&nbsp;Mark Sagar ,&nbsp;Michael Antoni ,&nbsp;Kate Loveys ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Broadbent","doi":"10.1016/j.chbah.2024.100069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Stress is a significant issue amongst university students, yet limited psychological services are available. Mindfulness is effective for stress reduction and can be delivered digitally to expand access to student populations. However, digital interventions often suffer from low engagement and poor adherence. A virtual human may improve engagement and adherence through its humanlike appearance and behaviours.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To examine whether a virtual human could reduce stress in university students at least as much as a teletherapist, and more than a chatbot, using a mindfulness intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Stressed university students (N = 158) were randomly allocated to the virtual human (N = 54), chatbot (N = 54), or teletherapist (N = 50). 36 participants received each condition. Participants completed one lab session and were asked to do online homework sessions at least twice weekly for four weeks. Changes in self-reported stress and mindfulness, physiological stress indices, homework completion, and perceptions of the agent were compared between groups. Thematic analysis was conducted on participants’ responses to open-ended questions about the interventions.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were significant reductions in stress and increases in mindfulness across all groups. All groups had higher peripheral skin temperature post-intervention, and only the teletherapy group had higher electrodermal activity (reflecting elevated stress) post-intervention compared to baseline. There were no significant changes in heart rate. Homework adherence was significantly higher in the virtual human group, whereas homework satisfaction and engagement were lowest in the chatbot group. Thematic analysis found that people thought the robotic voice of the virtual human could be improved, the chatbot could be improved by adding audio, and that participants experienced feelings of judgement from the teletherapist.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Overall, results support use of virtual humans for delivering mindfulness interventions in stressed students. Virtual humans may have the advantage over teletherapy and chatbots of increasing adherence in student populations, but more work is needed to increase perceived empathy and replicate results in other populations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100324,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans","volume":"2 1","pages":"Article 100069"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294988212400029X/pdfft?md5=74242b19d6c2fa1244faa14ce39bc34e&pid=1-s2.0-S294988212400029X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294988212400029X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Stress is a significant issue amongst university students, yet limited psychological services are available. Mindfulness is effective for stress reduction and can be delivered digitally to expand access to student populations. However, digital interventions often suffer from low engagement and poor adherence. A virtual human may improve engagement and adherence through its humanlike appearance and behaviours.

Objective

To examine whether a virtual human could reduce stress in university students at least as much as a teletherapist, and more than a chatbot, using a mindfulness intervention.

Methods

Stressed university students (N = 158) were randomly allocated to the virtual human (N = 54), chatbot (N = 54), or teletherapist (N = 50). 36 participants received each condition. Participants completed one lab session and were asked to do online homework sessions at least twice weekly for four weeks. Changes in self-reported stress and mindfulness, physiological stress indices, homework completion, and perceptions of the agent were compared between groups. Thematic analysis was conducted on participants’ responses to open-ended questions about the interventions.

Results

There were significant reductions in stress and increases in mindfulness across all groups. All groups had higher peripheral skin temperature post-intervention, and only the teletherapy group had higher electrodermal activity (reflecting elevated stress) post-intervention compared to baseline. There were no significant changes in heart rate. Homework adherence was significantly higher in the virtual human group, whereas homework satisfaction and engagement were lowest in the chatbot group. Thematic analysis found that people thought the robotic voice of the virtual human could be improved, the chatbot could be improved by adding audio, and that participants experienced feelings of judgement from the teletherapist.

Discussion

Overall, results support use of virtual humans for delivering mindfulness interventions in stressed students. Virtual humans may have the advantage over teletherapy and chatbots of increasing adherence in student populations, but more work is needed to increase perceived empathy and replicate results in other populations.

虚拟人能增强正念和减轻压力吗?随机试验
背景压力是大学生面临的一个重要问题,但可提供的心理服务却很有限。正念对减轻压力很有效,而且可以通过数字方式提供,以扩大学生群体的参与度。然而,数字化干预措施往往存在参与度低、坚持性差的问题。虚拟人可以通过其类似人类的外观和行为来提高参与度和坚持度。方法将压力过大的大学生(N = 158)随机分配给虚拟人(N = 54)、聊天机器人(N = 54)或电话治疗师(N = 50)。每个条件均有 36 名参与者。参与者完成一次实验课,并被要求在四周内每周至少做两次在线家庭作业。比较了各组之间在自我报告的压力和正念、生理压力指数、作业完成情况以及对代理人的看法等方面的变化。对参与者回答的有关干预措施的开放式问题进行了主题分析。与基线相比,所有小组在干预后的外周皮肤温度都有所升高,只有远程治疗组在干预后的皮电活动(反映压力升高)有所升高。心率没有明显变化。虚拟人组的作业坚持率明显更高,而聊天机器人组的作业满意度和参与度最低。专题分析发现,人们认为虚拟人的机器人声音可以改进,聊天机器人可以通过添加音频来改进,而且参与者体验到了来自远程治疗师的评判感。与远程治疗和聊天机器人相比,虚拟人在提高学生的坚持率方面可能更有优势,但还需要做更多的工作来提高感知共鸣,并在其他人群中复制结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信