MCLFIQ: Mobile Contactless Fingerprint Image Quality

Jannis Priesnitz;Axel Weißenfeld;Laurenz Ruzicka;Christian Rathgeb;Bernhard Strobl;Ralph Lessmann;Christoph Busch
{"title":"MCLFIQ: Mobile Contactless Fingerprint Image Quality","authors":"Jannis Priesnitz;Axel Weißenfeld;Laurenz Ruzicka;Christian Rathgeb;Bernhard Strobl;Ralph Lessmann;Christoph Busch","doi":"10.1109/TBIOM.2024.3377686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We propose MCLFIQ: Mobile Contactless Fingerprint Image Quality, the first quality assessment algorithm for mobile contactless fingerprint samples. To this end, we re-trained the NIST Fingerprint Image Quality (NFIQ) 2 method, which was originally designed for contact-based fingerprints, with a synthetic contactless fingerprint database. We evaluate the predictive performance of the resulting MCLFIQ model in terms of Error-vs.-Discard Characteristic (EDC) curves on three real-world contactless fingerprint databases using three recognition algorithms. In experiments, the MCLFIQ method is compared against the original NFIQ 2 method, a sharpness-based quality assessment algorithm developed for contactless fingerprint images and the general purpose image quality assessment method BRISQUE. Furthermore, benchmarks on four contact-based fingerprint datasets are also conducted. Obtained results show that the fine-tuning of NFIQ 2 on synthetic contactless fingerprints is a viable alternative to training on real databases. Moreover, the evaluation shows that our MCLFIQ method works more accurately and is more robust compared to all baseline methods on contactless fingerprints. We suggest considering the proposed MCLFIQ method as a starting point for the development of a new standard algorithm for contactless fingerprint quality assessment.","PeriodicalId":73307,"journal":{"name":"IEEE transactions on biometrics, behavior, and identity science","volume":"6 2","pages":"272-287"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10473152","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE transactions on biometrics, behavior, and identity science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10473152/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We propose MCLFIQ: Mobile Contactless Fingerprint Image Quality, the first quality assessment algorithm for mobile contactless fingerprint samples. To this end, we re-trained the NIST Fingerprint Image Quality (NFIQ) 2 method, which was originally designed for contact-based fingerprints, with a synthetic contactless fingerprint database. We evaluate the predictive performance of the resulting MCLFIQ model in terms of Error-vs.-Discard Characteristic (EDC) curves on three real-world contactless fingerprint databases using three recognition algorithms. In experiments, the MCLFIQ method is compared against the original NFIQ 2 method, a sharpness-based quality assessment algorithm developed for contactless fingerprint images and the general purpose image quality assessment method BRISQUE. Furthermore, benchmarks on four contact-based fingerprint datasets are also conducted. Obtained results show that the fine-tuning of NFIQ 2 on synthetic contactless fingerprints is a viable alternative to training on real databases. Moreover, the evaluation shows that our MCLFIQ method works more accurately and is more robust compared to all baseline methods on contactless fingerprints. We suggest considering the proposed MCLFIQ method as a starting point for the development of a new standard algorithm for contactless fingerprint quality assessment.
MCLFIQ:移动式非接触指纹图像质量
我们提出了 MCLFIQ:移动非接触式指纹图像质量",这是首个针对移动非接触式指纹样本的质量评估算法。为此,我们使用合成非接触式指纹数据库重新训练了 NIST 指纹图像质量(NFIQ)2 方法,该方法最初是为接触式指纹设计的。我们使用三种识别算法,在三个真实世界的非接触式指纹数据库上,根据误差与丢弃特征曲线(EDC)评估了由此产生的 MCLFIQ 模型的预测性能。在实验中,MCLFIQ 方法与原始的 NFIQ 2 方法、为非接触式指纹图像开发的基于锐度的质量评估算法以及通用图像质量评估方法 BRISQUE 进行了比较。此外,还在四个接触式指纹数据集上进行了基准测试。结果表明,在合成非接触式指纹上对 NFIQ 2 进行微调,是在真实数据库上进行训练的可行替代方法。此外,评估结果表明,在非接触式指纹上,我们的 MCLFIQ 方法比所有基线方法更准确、更稳健。我们建议将提出的 MCLFIQ 方法作为开发新的非接触式指纹质量评估标准算法的起点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信