Transient behavior of gossip opinion dynamics with community structure

IF 5.9 2区 计算机科学 Q1 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS
Yu Xing, Karl H. Johansson
{"title":"Transient behavior of gossip opinion dynamics with community structure","authors":"Yu Xing,&nbsp;Karl H. Johansson","doi":"10.1016/j.automatica.2024.111627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We study transient behavior of gossip opinion dynamics, in which agents randomly interact pairwise over a weighted graph with two communities. Edges within a community have identical weights different from edge weights between communities. We first derive an upper bound for the second moment of agent opinions. Using this result, we obtain upper bounds for probability that a large proportion of agents have opinions close to average opinions. The results imply a phase transition of transient behavior of the process: When edge weights within communities are larger than those between communities and those between regular and stubborn agents, most agents in the same community hold opinions close to the average opinion of that community with large probability, at an early stage of the process. However, if the difference between intra- and inter-community weights is small, most of the agents instead hold opinions close to everyone’s average opinion at the early stage. In contrast, when the influence of stubborn agents is large, agent opinions settle quickly to steady state. We then conduct numerical experiments to validate the theoretical results. Different from traditional asymptotic analysis in most opinion dynamics literature, the paper characterizes the influence of stubborn agents and community structure on the initial phase of the opinion evolution.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55413,"journal":{"name":"Automatica","volume":"164 ","pages":"Article 111627"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005109824001201/pdfft?md5=c004244c1b1cfc38d0b5df9bdc0e9051&pid=1-s2.0-S0005109824001201-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Automatica","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005109824001201","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We study transient behavior of gossip opinion dynamics, in which agents randomly interact pairwise over a weighted graph with two communities. Edges within a community have identical weights different from edge weights between communities. We first derive an upper bound for the second moment of agent opinions. Using this result, we obtain upper bounds for probability that a large proportion of agents have opinions close to average opinions. The results imply a phase transition of transient behavior of the process: When edge weights within communities are larger than those between communities and those between regular and stubborn agents, most agents in the same community hold opinions close to the average opinion of that community with large probability, at an early stage of the process. However, if the difference between intra- and inter-community weights is small, most of the agents instead hold opinions close to everyone’s average opinion at the early stage. In contrast, when the influence of stubborn agents is large, agent opinions settle quickly to steady state. We then conduct numerical experiments to validate the theoretical results. Different from traditional asymptotic analysis in most opinion dynamics literature, the paper characterizes the influence of stubborn agents and community structure on the initial phase of the opinion evolution.

Abstract Image

流言舆论动态的瞬态行为与社群结构
我们研究的是流言舆论动态的瞬态行为,在这种动态中,代理人在一个有两个社群的加权图上随机地成对互动。社区内的边的权重与社区间的边的权重完全相同。我们首先推导出代理意见第二矩的上界。利用这一结果,我们得到了大部分代理人的意见接近平均意见的概率上限。这些结果意味着过程的瞬态行为出现了阶段性转变:当社群内部的边缘权重大于社群之间的边缘权重,以及常规代理和顽固代理之间的边缘权重时,在过程的早期阶段,同一社群中的大多数代理持有的观点都有很大概率接近该社群的平均观点。但是,如果社群内权重和社群间权重的差异较小,大多数代理反而会在早期阶段持有接近所有人平均意见的观点。相反,当顽固代理人的影响力较大时,代理人的意见会很快趋于稳定状态。随后,我们进行了数值实验来验证理论结果。与大多数舆情动力学文献中的传统渐进分析不同,本文描述了顽固代理和社群结构对舆情演化初始阶段的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Automatica
Automatica 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
7.80%
发文量
617
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Automatica is a leading archival publication in the field of systems and control. The field encompasses today a broad set of areas and topics, and is thriving not only within itself but also in terms of its impact on other fields, such as communications, computers, biology, energy and economics. Since its inception in 1963, Automatica has kept abreast with the evolution of the field over the years, and has emerged as a leading publication driving the trends in the field. After being founded in 1963, Automatica became a journal of the International Federation of Automatic Control (IFAC) in 1969. It features a characteristic blend of theoretical and applied papers of archival, lasting value, reporting cutting edge research results by authors across the globe. It features articles in distinct categories, including regular, brief and survey papers, technical communiqués, correspondence items, as well as reviews on published books of interest to the readership. It occasionally publishes special issues on emerging new topics or established mature topics of interest to a broad audience. Automatica solicits original high-quality contributions in all the categories listed above, and in all areas of systems and control interpreted in a broad sense and evolving constantly. They may be submitted directly to a subject editor or to the Editor-in-Chief if not sure about the subject area. Editorial procedures in place assure careful, fair, and prompt handling of all submitted articles. Accepted papers appear in the journal in the shortest time feasible given production time constraints.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信