Actionable code smell identification with fusion learning of metrics and semantics

IF 1.5 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Dongjin Yu, Quanxin Yang, Xin Chen, Jie Chen, Sixuan Wang, Yihang Xu
{"title":"Actionable code smell identification with fusion learning of metrics and semantics","authors":"Dongjin Yu,&nbsp;Quanxin Yang,&nbsp;Xin Chen,&nbsp;Jie Chen,&nbsp;Sixuan Wang,&nbsp;Yihang Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.scico.2024.103110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Code smell detection is one of the essential tasks in the field of software engineering. Identifying whether a code snippet has a code smell is subjective and varies by programming language, developer, and development method. Moreover, developers tend to focus on code smells that have a real impact on development and ignore insignificant ones. However, existing static code analysis tools and code smell detection approaches exhibit a high false positive rate in detecting code smells, which makes insignificant smells drown out those smells that developers value. Therefore, accurately reporting those actionable code smells that developers tend to spend energy on refactoring can prevent developers from getting lost in the sea of smells and improve refactoring efficiency. In this paper, we aim to detect actionable code smells that developers tend to refactor. Specifically, we first collect actionable and non-actionable code smells from projects with numerous historical versions to construct our datasets. Then, we propose a dual-stream model for fusion learning of code metrics and code semantics to detect actionable code smells. On the one hand, code metrics quantify the code's structure and even some rules or patterns, providing fundamental information for detecting code smells. On the other hand, code semantics encompass information about developers' refactoring tendencies, which prove valuable in detecting actionable code smells. Extensive experiments show that our approach can detect actionable code smells more accurately compared to existing approaches.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49561,"journal":{"name":"Science of Computer Programming","volume":"236 ","pages":"Article 103110"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of Computer Programming","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167642324000339","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Code smell detection is one of the essential tasks in the field of software engineering. Identifying whether a code snippet has a code smell is subjective and varies by programming language, developer, and development method. Moreover, developers tend to focus on code smells that have a real impact on development and ignore insignificant ones. However, existing static code analysis tools and code smell detection approaches exhibit a high false positive rate in detecting code smells, which makes insignificant smells drown out those smells that developers value. Therefore, accurately reporting those actionable code smells that developers tend to spend energy on refactoring can prevent developers from getting lost in the sea of smells and improve refactoring efficiency. In this paper, we aim to detect actionable code smells that developers tend to refactor. Specifically, we first collect actionable and non-actionable code smells from projects with numerous historical versions to construct our datasets. Then, we propose a dual-stream model for fusion learning of code metrics and code semantics to detect actionable code smells. On the one hand, code metrics quantify the code's structure and even some rules or patterns, providing fundamental information for detecting code smells. On the other hand, code semantics encompass information about developers' refactoring tendencies, which prove valuable in detecting actionable code smells. Extensive experiments show that our approach can detect actionable code smells more accurately compared to existing approaches.

通过度量标准和语义的融合学习识别可操作的代码气味
代码气味检测是软件工程领域的基本任务之一。识别代码片段是否有代码气味是主观的,而且因编程语言、开发人员和开发方法的不同而各异。此外,开发人员倾向于关注对开发有实际影响的代码气味,而忽略无关紧要的代码气味。然而,现有的静态代码分析工具和代码气味检测方法在检测代码气味时表现出很高的假阳性率,这使得无关紧要的气味淹没了开发人员重视的气味。因此,准确报告开发人员倾向于花费精力重构的可操作代码气味,可以防止开发人员迷失在气味的海洋中,提高重构效率。本文旨在检测开发人员倾向于重构的可操作代码气味。具体来说,我们首先从具有大量历史版本的项目中收集可操作和不可操作的代码气味,构建数据集。然后,我们提出了一种融合学习代码度量和代码语义的双流模型,以检测可操作的代码气味。一方面,代码度量可以量化代码的结构,甚至是一些规则或模式,为检测代码气味提供基础信息。另一方面,代码语义包含有关开发人员重构倾向的信息,这些信息对检测可操作的代码气味非常有价值。广泛的实验表明,与现有方法相比,我们的方法能更准确地检测到可操作的代码气味。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Science of Computer Programming
Science of Computer Programming 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Science of Computer Programming is dedicated to the distribution of research results in the areas of software systems development, use and maintenance, including the software aspects of hardware design. The journal has a wide scope ranging from the many facets of methodological foundations to the details of technical issues andthe aspects of industrial practice. The subjects of interest to SCP cover the entire spectrum of methods for the entire life cycle of software systems, including • Requirements, specification, design, validation, verification, coding, testing, maintenance, metrics and renovation of software; • Design, implementation and evaluation of programming languages; • Programming environments, development tools, visualisation and animation; • Management of the development process; • Human factors in software, software for social interaction, software for social computing; • Cyber physical systems, and software for the interaction between the physical and the machine; • Software aspects of infrastructure services, system administration, and network management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信