Creation of the MaaS readiness index with a modified AHP-ISM method

IF 12.5 Q1 TRANSPORTATION
Attila Aba, Domokos Esztergár-Kiss
{"title":"Creation of the MaaS readiness index with a modified AHP-ISM method","authors":"Attila Aba,&nbsp;Domokos Esztergár-Kiss","doi":"10.1016/j.commtr.2024.100122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Smart mobility solutions are trending in the mobility domain realized through pilot activities and commercial solutions, but there is a lack of a broad framework defining the readiness to introduce such mobility solutions in a specific area. In this research, smart mobility solutions are examined in the perspective of the Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) scheme that is an adequate representation of the maturity of a region regarding smart mobility solutions including technology, business, and coopetition aspects. These three aspects define the feature selection, whereas surveys are used to collect input data from local experts (LEs). For weighting the features, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is used with a modified interpretive structural modeling (ISM). With this modification, an expert-friendly process is developed without affecting the results. The elaborated MaaS readiness index (MRI) is applied to six regions with different types of mobility related pilot activities to demonstrate the MRI as a comparison tool between regions and between ex-ante and ex-post pilot activities. The developed interpretive structural modeling with Graph (ISM-G) methodology requites remarkably less work from the evaluators compared to the ISM, while no important difference appeared in the results. The MRI can support smart mobility related pilot evaluations, whereas the ISM-G can be used widely in decision-making.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100292,"journal":{"name":"Communications in Transportation Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772424724000052/pdfft?md5=47cf8eb5c19c492c8387d92054f3fc47&pid=1-s2.0-S2772424724000052-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications in Transportation Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772424724000052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Smart mobility solutions are trending in the mobility domain realized through pilot activities and commercial solutions, but there is a lack of a broad framework defining the readiness to introduce such mobility solutions in a specific area. In this research, smart mobility solutions are examined in the perspective of the Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) scheme that is an adequate representation of the maturity of a region regarding smart mobility solutions including technology, business, and coopetition aspects. These three aspects define the feature selection, whereas surveys are used to collect input data from local experts (LEs). For weighting the features, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is used with a modified interpretive structural modeling (ISM). With this modification, an expert-friendly process is developed without affecting the results. The elaborated MaaS readiness index (MRI) is applied to six regions with different types of mobility related pilot activities to demonstrate the MRI as a comparison tool between regions and between ex-ante and ex-post pilot activities. The developed interpretive structural modeling with Graph (ISM-G) methodology requites remarkably less work from the evaluators compared to the ISM, while no important difference appeared in the results. The MRI can support smart mobility related pilot evaluations, whereas the ISM-G can be used widely in decision-making.

用改进的 AHP-ISM 方法创建 MaaS 就绪指数
通过试点活动和商业解决方案,智能交通解决方案已成为交通领域的发展趋势,但目前还缺乏一个广泛的框架来界定在特定地区引入此类交通解决方案的准备程度。本研究从移动即服务(MaaS)方案的角度研究了智能移动解决方案,该方案充分体现了一个地区在智能移动解决方案方面的成熟度,包括技术、商业和合作竞争等方面。这三个方面决定了特征选择,而调查则用于收集当地专家(LE)的输入数据。在对特征进行加权时,使用了经过改进的解释性结构建模(ISM)的层次分析法(AHP)。通过这一修改,在不影响结果的情况下开发出了专家友好型流程。详细制定的 MaaS 准备指数(MRI)被应用于六个开展了不同类型移动相关试点活动的地区,以展示 MRI 作为地区之间以及事前和事后试点活动之间的比较工具的作用。与图解结构建模(ISM-G)相比,所开发的图解结构建模方法大大减少了评估人员的工作量,但在结果上却没有出现重大差异。MRI 可以支持与智能交通相关的试点评估,而 ISM-G 则可广泛用于决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信