{"title":"Shadow of the giant: How global value chain participation influences the knowledge structure of SMEs","authors":"Yimin Wang, Li Xin","doi":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2024.102270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Beyond the knowledge acquisition facilitated by global value chain (GVC) participation for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), extant studies have largely overlooked its impact on the knowledge structure (knowledge depth vs. breadth) of SMEs, whose GVC linkages are normally trapped in captive relationships dedicated to customized and exclusive tasks. Introducing an interactive perspective of power-embeddedness logic, this study examines how GVC participation affects SMEs’ knowledge structure. Based on the large longitudinal data of China’s SMEs, estimations from the Panel Fixed effects model and Negative Binomial model indicate that while GVC participation has a positive effect on knowledge depth, it has an inverted U-shaped effect on knowledge breadth. Moreover, relationship history and indigenous R&D differently moderate the effects of GVC participation on knowledge depth and breadth by influencing either power or embeddedness logic. These findings provide new insights into the complex interaction between the two logics and SMEs’ constraint response in GVC linkages through deliberate knowledge management.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51352,"journal":{"name":"International Business Review","volume":"33 3","pages":"Article 102270"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969593124000179","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Beyond the knowledge acquisition facilitated by global value chain (GVC) participation for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), extant studies have largely overlooked its impact on the knowledge structure (knowledge depth vs. breadth) of SMEs, whose GVC linkages are normally trapped in captive relationships dedicated to customized and exclusive tasks. Introducing an interactive perspective of power-embeddedness logic, this study examines how GVC participation affects SMEs’ knowledge structure. Based on the large longitudinal data of China’s SMEs, estimations from the Panel Fixed effects model and Negative Binomial model indicate that while GVC participation has a positive effect on knowledge depth, it has an inverted U-shaped effect on knowledge breadth. Moreover, relationship history and indigenous R&D differently moderate the effects of GVC participation on knowledge depth and breadth by influencing either power or embeddedness logic. These findings provide new insights into the complex interaction between the two logics and SMEs’ constraint response in GVC linkages through deliberate knowledge management.
除了全球价值链(GVC)的参与为中小企业获取知识提供了便利之外,现有研究在很大程度上忽视了它对中小企业知识结构(知识深度与广度)的影响,因为中小企业与全球价值链的联系通常受困于专门用于定制和排他性任务的圈养关系。本研究引入权力嵌入逻辑的互动视角,探讨了全球价值链的参与如何影响中小企业的知识结构。基于中国中小企业的大量纵向数据,面板固定效应模型和负二项模型的估计结果表明,参与全球价值链对知识深度有正向影响,但对知识广度的影响呈倒 U 型。此外,关系史和本土研发对参与全球价值链对知识深度和广度的影响具有不同的调节作用,因为它们会影响权力逻辑或嵌入逻辑。这些发现为两种逻辑之间的复杂互动以及中小企业通过有意识的知识管理在全球价值链联系中做出约束响应提供了新的见解。
期刊介绍:
The International Business Review (IBR) stands as a premier international journal within the realm of international business and proudly serves as the official publication of the European International Business Academy (EIBA). This esteemed journal publishes original and insightful papers addressing the theory and practice of international business, encompassing a broad spectrum of topics such as firms' internationalization strategies, cross-border management of operations, and comparative studies of business environments across different countries. In essence, IBR is dedicated to disseminating research that informs the international operations of firms, whether they are SMEs or large MNEs, and guides the actions of policymakers in both home and host countries. The journal warmly welcomes conceptual papers, empirical studies, and review articles, fostering contributions from various disciplines including strategy, finance, management, marketing, economics, HRM, and organizational studies. IBR embraces methodological diversity, with equal openness to papers utilizing quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-method approaches.