Mattia Morri, Riccardo Ruisi, Antonio Culcasi, Vincenzo Peccerillo
{"title":"The Effectiveness of Telerehabilitation for Functional Recovery After Orthopedic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Mattia Morri, Riccardo Ruisi, Antonio Culcasi, Vincenzo Peccerillo","doi":"10.1089/tmr.2023.0057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the effectiveness of physiotherapy treatment provided remotely via the Internet in the postoperative treatment of orthopedic patients and compare it with standard physiotherapy (face-to-face treatment or home-based treatment) in terms of motor performance, pain symptoms, and functional recovery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of MEDLINE, Physiotherapy Evidence Database; EMBASE, SCOPUS, and CINHAL was conducted. Two independent reviewers performed study selection, data extraction, risk of bias (ROB) assessment using Cochrane ROB 2 tools, and summarize the results by Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven randomized controlled trial were selected. Pooled results showed improvement in motor performance in favor of the telerehabilitation group at 4-6 weeks (standardized mean difference -0.24, 95% confidence interval -0.45, -0.02, <i>p</i> = 0.03), and these differences were close to the minimum clinically important difference for Time Up and Go test. For pain and functional recovery, the results showed differences not statistically important. The certainty of evidence ranged from moderate to very low.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For joint replacement patients, treatment conducted via telerehabilitation appears able to provide levels of motor performance better to that achieved through home-based treatment. In contrast, conclusive evidence that telerehabilitation is comparable to standard face-to-face treatment are not available.</p>","PeriodicalId":94218,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine reports","volume":"5 1","pages":"78-88"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10979691/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2023.0057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the effectiveness of physiotherapy treatment provided remotely via the Internet in the postoperative treatment of orthopedic patients and compare it with standard physiotherapy (face-to-face treatment or home-based treatment) in terms of motor performance, pain symptoms, and functional recovery.
Methods: A systematic search of MEDLINE, Physiotherapy Evidence Database; EMBASE, SCOPUS, and CINHAL was conducted. Two independent reviewers performed study selection, data extraction, risk of bias (ROB) assessment using Cochrane ROB 2 tools, and summarize the results by Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation.
Results: Eleven randomized controlled trial were selected. Pooled results showed improvement in motor performance in favor of the telerehabilitation group at 4-6 weeks (standardized mean difference -0.24, 95% confidence interval -0.45, -0.02, p = 0.03), and these differences were close to the minimum clinically important difference for Time Up and Go test. For pain and functional recovery, the results showed differences not statistically important. The certainty of evidence ranged from moderate to very low.
Conclusion: For joint replacement patients, treatment conducted via telerehabilitation appears able to provide levels of motor performance better to that achieved through home-based treatment. In contrast, conclusive evidence that telerehabilitation is comparable to standard face-to-face treatment are not available.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
