The Impact of Experience Versus Decision Aids on Patient Preference Toward Virtual Care.

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Telemedicine reports Pub Date : 2024-03-21 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1089/tmr.2024.0001
Aaron R Prater, Jack T McConnell, Nikhil R Yedulla, Edward L Peterson, Trevor R Banka, Charles S Day
{"title":"The Impact of Experience Versus Decision Aids on Patient Preference Toward Virtual Care.","authors":"Aaron R Prater, Jack T McConnell, Nikhil R Yedulla, Edward L Peterson, Trevor R Banka, Charles S Day","doi":"10.1089/tmr.2024.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Virtual care utilization has increased in recent years bringing questions of how to best inform patients regarding their use. Decision aids (DAs) are tools created to assist patients in making informed decisions about their health care. This study seeks to determine whether a DA or previous experience could better educate and influence patient's preference on virtual care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred fifty participants from an orthopedic clinic of a multi-hospital system were divided into three groups. Group 1 (Virtual Care Cohort) had at least one previous virtual care visit and was surveyed with the Telemedicine Satisfaction Questionnaire (TSQ). Group 2 (In-person with Decision Aid) and Group 3 (In-person without Decision Aid) had no virtual care experience. Group 2 received a validated virtual care DA with a knowledge test. Both groups were also administered the TSQ.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After the DA, patients improved their score on 3 of 4 virtual care knowledge questions. Each cohort demonstrated a positive perception of virtual care; however, the specific reasons for their favorable views varied. The DA cohort did not show increased preference toward virtual care compared with the non-DA group and only responded significantly higher regarding encounter comfort. Patients with previous experience in virtual care responded most favorably to the majority of survey questions regarding their virtual care preferences when compared with both virtual care naive cohorts.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>We found that patient experience was the most important factor in influencing patient preference toward virtual care. Although the DA increased their virtual care knowledge it did not increase their preference; therefore, efforts should be placed at encouraging patient to experience virtual care.</p>","PeriodicalId":94218,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine reports","volume":"5 1","pages":"59-66"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10979688/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2024.0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Virtual care utilization has increased in recent years bringing questions of how to best inform patients regarding their use. Decision aids (DAs) are tools created to assist patients in making informed decisions about their health care. This study seeks to determine whether a DA or previous experience could better educate and influence patient's preference on virtual care.

Methods: One hundred fifty participants from an orthopedic clinic of a multi-hospital system were divided into three groups. Group 1 (Virtual Care Cohort) had at least one previous virtual care visit and was surveyed with the Telemedicine Satisfaction Questionnaire (TSQ). Group 2 (In-person with Decision Aid) and Group 3 (In-person without Decision Aid) had no virtual care experience. Group 2 received a validated virtual care DA with a knowledge test. Both groups were also administered the TSQ.

Results: After the DA, patients improved their score on 3 of 4 virtual care knowledge questions. Each cohort demonstrated a positive perception of virtual care; however, the specific reasons for their favorable views varied. The DA cohort did not show increased preference toward virtual care compared with the non-DA group and only responded significantly higher regarding encounter comfort. Patients with previous experience in virtual care responded most favorably to the majority of survey questions regarding their virtual care preferences when compared with both virtual care naive cohorts.

Discussion and conclusion: We found that patient experience was the most important factor in influencing patient preference toward virtual care. Although the DA increased their virtual care knowledge it did not increase their preference; therefore, efforts should be placed at encouraging patient to experience virtual care.

经验与决策辅助工具对患者虚拟护理偏好的影响。
导言:近年来,虚拟医疗的使用率越来越高,这也带来了如何更好地告知患者使用虚拟医疗的问题。决策辅助工具(DAs)是为帮助患者就其医疗保健做出知情决定而创建的工具。本研究旨在确定DA或以往的经验是否能更好地教育和影响患者对虚拟医疗的偏好:来自一家多医院系统骨科诊所的 150 名参与者被分为三组。第一组(虚拟医疗组)至少有过一次虚拟医疗就诊经历,并接受了远程医疗满意度问卷调查(TSQ)。第 2 组(有决策辅助工具的亲诊)和第 3 组(无决策辅助工具的亲诊)没有虚拟医疗经验。第 2 组接受了经过验证的虚拟医疗诊断和知识测试。结果:结果:DA 后,患者在 4 个虚拟医疗知识问题中的 3 个问题上的得分都有所提高。每组患者都对虚拟医疗表现出了积极的看法;但是,他们产生好感的具体原因各不相同。与非 DA 组相比,DA 组患者对虚拟医疗的偏好并没有增加,仅在就诊舒适度方面的回答明显较高。与两个虚拟医疗新手队列相比,有过虚拟医疗经验的患者对有关虚拟医疗偏好的大多数调查问题的回答都最为积极:我们发现,患者经验是影响患者对虚拟医疗偏好的最重要因素。尽管DA增加了他们对虚拟医疗的了解,但并没有增加他们对虚拟医疗的偏好;因此,应努力鼓励患者体验虚拟医疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信