"I'm pulling through because of you": injured workers' perspective of workplace factors supporting return to work under the Saskatchewan Workers' Compensation Board scheme.

IF 1.3 Q3 REHABILITATION
Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences Pub Date : 2024-03-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fresc.2024.1373888
Ian Lewis, Jonathan Houdmont
{"title":"\"I'm pulling through because of you\": injured workers' perspective of workplace factors supporting return to work under the Saskatchewan Workers' Compensation Board scheme.","authors":"Ian Lewis, Jonathan Houdmont","doi":"10.3389/fresc.2024.1373888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research demonstrates sustained return to work (RTW) by individuals on medical leave is influenced by personal and job resources and job demands. Relatively few studies have been conducted in the workers' compensation context that is known to have longer absence durations for RTW.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study sought to illuminate workers' experience as they returned to work following a work injury that was either psychological in nature or involved more than 50 days of disability, with a focus on the co-worker, supervisor, and employer actions that supported their return.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Workers in Saskatchewan, Canada, with a work-related psychological or musculoskeletal injury, subsequent disability, and who returned to work in the last three years, were invited to complete an online survey comprising of free-text questions. Thematic analysis was used to explore participants' experiences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses from 93 individuals were analysed. These revealed that persistent pain, emotional distress, and loss of normal abilities were present during and beyond returning to work. Almost two-thirds indicated that the supervisors' and co-workers' support was critical to a sustained return to work: their needs were recognized and they received autonomy and support to manage work demands. By contrast, one-third indicated that the support they expected and needed from supervisors and employers was lacking.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Workers returning to work lacked personal resources but co-workers' and supervisors' support helped improve confidence in their ability to RTW. Supervisors and employers should acknowledge workers' experiences and offer support and autonomy. Likewise, workers can expect challenges when returning to work and may benefit from cultivating supportive relationships with co-workers and supervisors.</p>","PeriodicalId":73102,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10978658/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2024.1373888","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Research demonstrates sustained return to work (RTW) by individuals on medical leave is influenced by personal and job resources and job demands. Relatively few studies have been conducted in the workers' compensation context that is known to have longer absence durations for RTW.

Aims: This study sought to illuminate workers' experience as they returned to work following a work injury that was either psychological in nature or involved more than 50 days of disability, with a focus on the co-worker, supervisor, and employer actions that supported their return.

Methods: Workers in Saskatchewan, Canada, with a work-related psychological or musculoskeletal injury, subsequent disability, and who returned to work in the last three years, were invited to complete an online survey comprising of free-text questions. Thematic analysis was used to explore participants' experiences.

Results: Responses from 93 individuals were analysed. These revealed that persistent pain, emotional distress, and loss of normal abilities were present during and beyond returning to work. Almost two-thirds indicated that the supervisors' and co-workers' support was critical to a sustained return to work: their needs were recognized and they received autonomy and support to manage work demands. By contrast, one-third indicated that the support they expected and needed from supervisors and employers was lacking.

Conclusions: Workers returning to work lacked personal resources but co-workers' and supervisors' support helped improve confidence in their ability to RTW. Supervisors and employers should acknowledge workers' experiences and offer support and autonomy. Likewise, workers can expect challenges when returning to work and may benefit from cultivating supportive relationships with co-workers and supervisors.

"因为有你,我才能挺过来":受伤工人对萨斯喀彻温省工人赔偿委员会计划下支持重返工作岗位的工作场所因素的看法。
背景:研究表明,休病假者持续重返工作岗位(RTW)受到个人和工作资源以及工作要求的影响。目的:本研究旨在了解工人在工伤后重返工作岗位的经历,这些工伤要么是心理性伤害,要么是超过 50 天的残疾,研究重点是支持工人重返工作岗位的同事、主管和雇主的行为:我们邀请加拿大萨斯喀彻温省在过去三年中因心理或肌肉骨骼工伤而重返工作岗位、随后致残的工人填写一份由自由文本问题组成的在线调查。调查采用主题分析法探讨参与者的经历:结果:对 93 人的回复进行了分析。结果:对 93 人的回答进行了分析,结果显示,在重返工作岗位期间和之后,持续疼痛、情绪低落和丧失正常能力的情况时有发生。近三分之二的人表示,上司和同事的支持对他们持续重返工作岗位至关重要:他们的需求得到了认可,他们在处理工作需求方面获得了自主权和支持。与此相反,三分之一的人表示,他们期望和需要的上司和雇主的支持并不到位:结论:重返工作岗位的工人缺乏个人资源,但同事和主管的支持有助于提高他们对自己复工能力的信心。主管和雇主应认可工人的经历,并提供支持和自主权。同样,工人在重返工作岗位时可能会遇到挑战,与同事和主管建立支持性关系可能会使他们受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信