Artificial intelligence for screening and diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Tungki Pratama Umar, Nityanand Jain, Manthia Papageorgakopoulou, Rahma Sameh Shaheen, Jehad Feras Alsamhori, Muhammad Muzzamil, Andrejs Kostiks
{"title":"Artificial intelligence for screening and diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Tungki Pratama Umar, Nityanand Jain, Manthia Papageorgakopoulou, Rahma Sameh Shaheen, Jehad Feras Alsamhori, Muhammad Muzzamil, Andrejs Kostiks","doi":"10.1080/21678421.2024.2334836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a rare and fatal neurological disease that leads to progressive motor function degeneration. Diagnosing ALS is challenging due to the absence of a specific detection test. The use of artificial intelligence (AI) can assist in the investigation and treatment of ALS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched seven databases for literature on the application of AI in the early diagnosis and screening of ALS in humans. The findings were summarized using random-effects summary receiver operating characteristic curve. The risk of bias (RoB) analysis was carried out using QUADAS-2 or QUADAS-C tools.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the 34 analyzed studies, a meta-prevalence of 47% for ALS was noted. For ALS detection, the pooled sensitivity of AI models was 94.3% (95% CI - 63.2% to 99.4%) with a pooled specificity of 98.9% (95% CI - 92.4% to 99.9%). For ALS classification, the pooled sensitivity of AI models was 90.9% (95% CI - 86.5% to 93.9%) with a pooled specificity of 92.3% (95% CI - 84.8% to 96.3%). Based on type of input for classification, the pooled sensitivity of AI models for gait, electromyography, and magnetic resonance signals was 91.2%, 92.6%, and 82.2%, respectively. The pooled specificity for gait, electromyography, and magnetic resonance signals was 94.1%, 96.5%, and 77.3%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although AI can play a significant role in the screening and diagnosis of ALS due to its high sensitivities and specificities, concerns remain regarding quality of evidence reported in the literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":72184,"journal":{"name":"Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21678421.2024.2334836","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a rare and fatal neurological disease that leads to progressive motor function degeneration. Diagnosing ALS is challenging due to the absence of a specific detection test. The use of artificial intelligence (AI) can assist in the investigation and treatment of ALS.

Methods: We searched seven databases for literature on the application of AI in the early diagnosis and screening of ALS in humans. The findings were summarized using random-effects summary receiver operating characteristic curve. The risk of bias (RoB) analysis was carried out using QUADAS-2 or QUADAS-C tools.

Results: In the 34 analyzed studies, a meta-prevalence of 47% for ALS was noted. For ALS detection, the pooled sensitivity of AI models was 94.3% (95% CI - 63.2% to 99.4%) with a pooled specificity of 98.9% (95% CI - 92.4% to 99.9%). For ALS classification, the pooled sensitivity of AI models was 90.9% (95% CI - 86.5% to 93.9%) with a pooled specificity of 92.3% (95% CI - 84.8% to 96.3%). Based on type of input for classification, the pooled sensitivity of AI models for gait, electromyography, and magnetic resonance signals was 91.2%, 92.6%, and 82.2%, respectively. The pooled specificity for gait, electromyography, and magnetic resonance signals was 94.1%, 96.5%, and 77.3%, respectively.

Conclusions: Although AI can play a significant role in the screening and diagnosis of ALS due to its high sensitivities and specificities, concerns remain regarding quality of evidence reported in the literature.

人工智能筛查和诊断肌萎缩侧索硬化症:系统综述和荟萃分析。
简介肌萎缩性脊髓侧索硬化症(ALS)是一种罕见的致命性神经系统疾病,会导致进行性运动功能退化。由于缺乏特异性检测试验,诊断 ALS 具有挑战性。使用人工智能(AI)可以帮助调查和治疗 ALS:我们在七个数据库中搜索了有关人工智能在人类 ALS 早期诊断和筛查中应用的文献。研究结果采用随机效应总结接收器操作特征曲线进行总结。使用QUADAS-2或QUADAS-C工具进行偏倚风险(RoB)分析:在 34 项分析研究中,ALS 的元患病率为 47%。在 ALS 检测方面,人工智能模型的集合灵敏度为 94.3%(95% CI - 63.2% 至 99.4%),集合特异性为 98.9%(95% CI - 92.4% 至 99.9%)。对于 ALS 分类,人工智能模型的集合灵敏度为 90.9%(95% CI - 86.5% 至 93.9%),集合特异性为 92.3%(95% CI - 84.8% 至 96.3%)。根据分类输入的类型,步态、肌电图和磁共振信号的人工智能模型的集合灵敏度分别为 91.2%、92.6% 和 82.2%。步态、肌电图和磁共振信号的集合特异性分别为 94.1%、96.5% 和 77.3%:尽管人工智能因其高灵敏度和高特异性可在 ALS 的筛查和诊断中发挥重要作用,但文献报道的证据质量仍令人担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信