Increasing Access To Perinatal Mental Health Care: The Perinatal Psychiatry Access Program Model.

IF 8.6 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Ana J Schaefer, Thomas Mackie, Ekaanth S Veerakumar, Radley Christopher Sheldrick, Tiffany A Moore Simas, Jeanette Valentine, Deborah Cowley, Amritha Bhat, Wendy Davis, Nancy Byatt
{"title":"Increasing Access To Perinatal Mental Health Care: The Perinatal Psychiatry Access Program Model.","authors":"Ana J Schaefer, Thomas Mackie, Ekaanth S Veerakumar, Radley Christopher Sheldrick, Tiffany A Moore Simas, Jeanette Valentine, Deborah Cowley, Amritha Bhat, Wendy Davis, Nancy Byatt","doi":"10.1377/hlthaff.2023.01439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Perinatal psychiatry access programs offer a scalable approach to building the capacity of perinatal professionals to identify, assess, and treat mental health conditions. Little is known about access programs' implementation and the relative merits of differing approaches. We conducted surveys and semistructured interviews with access program staff and reviewed policy and procedure documents from the fifteen access programs that had been implemented in the United States as of March 2021, when the study was conducted. Since then, the number of access programs has grown to thirty state, regional, or national programs. Access programs implemented up to five program components, including telephone consultation with a perinatal psychiatry expert, one-time patient-facing consultation with a perinatal psychiatry expert, resource and referral to perinatal professionals or patients, trainings for perinatal professionals, and practice-level technical assistance. Characterizing population-based intervention models, such as perinatal psychiatry access programs, that address perinatal mental health conditions is a needed step toward evaluating and improving programs' implementation, reach, and effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":50411,"journal":{"name":"Health Affairs","volume":"43 4","pages":"557-566"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2023.01439","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Perinatal psychiatry access programs offer a scalable approach to building the capacity of perinatal professionals to identify, assess, and treat mental health conditions. Little is known about access programs' implementation and the relative merits of differing approaches. We conducted surveys and semistructured interviews with access program staff and reviewed policy and procedure documents from the fifteen access programs that had been implemented in the United States as of March 2021, when the study was conducted. Since then, the number of access programs has grown to thirty state, regional, or national programs. Access programs implemented up to five program components, including telephone consultation with a perinatal psychiatry expert, one-time patient-facing consultation with a perinatal psychiatry expert, resource and referral to perinatal professionals or patients, trainings for perinatal professionals, and practice-level technical assistance. Characterizing population-based intervention models, such as perinatal psychiatry access programs, that address perinatal mental health conditions is a needed step toward evaluating and improving programs' implementation, reach, and effectiveness.

增加围产期心理保健的可及性:围产期精神病治疗项目模式。
围产期精神病学准入计划为围产期专业人员提供了一种可扩展的能力建设方法,以识别、评估和治疗精神健康状况。人们对该计划的实施情况以及不同方法的相对优势知之甚少。我们对接入项目的工作人员进行了调查和半结构化访谈,并查阅了截至 2021 年 3 月研究开展时美国已实施的 15 个接入项目的政策和程序文件。从那时起,无障碍计划的数量已增至 30 个州、地区或国家级计划。准入计划最多包含五项内容,包括与围产期精神病学专家的电话咨询、与围产期精神病学专家的一次性患者咨询、围产期专业人员或患者的资源和转介、围产期专业人员培训以及实践层面的技术援助。对以人群为基础的干预模式(如围产期精神科就诊项目)进行特征描述,以解决围产期精神健康问题,是评估和改进项目实施、覆盖范围和有效性的必要步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Affairs
Health Affairs 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
15.00
自引率
2.10%
发文量
246
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Affairs is a prestigious journal that aims to thoroughly examine significant health policy matters both domestically and globally. Our publication is committed to addressing issues that are relevant to both the private and public sectors. We are enthusiastic about inviting private and public decision-makers to contribute their innovative ideas in a publishable format. Health Affairs seeks to incorporate various perspectives from industry, labor, government, and academia, ensuring that our readers benefit from the diverse viewpoints within the healthcare field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信