Development and evaluation of trigger tools to identify pediatric blood management errors.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Blood Transfusion Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-27 DOI:10.2450/BloodTransfus.606
Swaminathan Kandaswamy, Cassandra D Josephson, Margo R Rollins, Jennifer Jones, Patricia Zerra, Ruchika Goel, Jennifer Andrews, Jeanne E Hendrickson, Lani Lieberman, Evan W Orenstein
{"title":"Development and evaluation of trigger tools to identify pediatric blood management errors.","authors":"Swaminathan Kandaswamy, Cassandra D Josephson, Margo R Rollins, Jennifer Jones, Patricia Zerra, Ruchika Goel, Jennifer Andrews, Jeanne E Hendrickson, Lani Lieberman, Evan W Orenstein","doi":"10.2450/BloodTransfus.606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pediatric Patient Blood Management (PBM) programs require continuous surveillance of errors and near misses. However, most PBM programs rely on passive surveillance methods. Our objective was to develop and evaluate a set of automated trigger tools for active surveillance of pediatric PBM errors.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We used the Rand-UCLA method with an expert panel of pediatric transfusion medicine specialists to identify and prioritize candidate trigger tools for all transfused blood products. We then iteratively developed automated queries of electronic health record (EHR) data for the highest priority triggers. Two physicians manually reviewed a subset of cases meeting trigger tool criteria and estimated each trigger tool's positive predictive value (PPV). We then estimated the rate of PBM errors, whether they reached the patient, and adverse events for each trigger tool across four years in a single pediatric health system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 28 potential triggers for pediatric PBM errors and developed 5 automated trigger tools (positive patient identification, missing irradiation, unwashed products despite prior anaphylaxis, transfusion lasting >4 hours, over-transfusion by volume). The PPV for ordering errors ranged from 38-100%. The most frequently detected near miss event reaching patients was first transfusions without positive patient identification (estimate 303, 95% CI: 288-318 per year). The only adverse events detected were from over-transfusions by volume, including 4 adverse events detected on manual review that had not been reported in passive surveillance systems.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>It is feasible to automatically detect pediatric PBM errors using existing data captured in the EHR that enable active surveillance systems. Over-transfusions may be one of the most frequent causes of harm in the pediatric environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":49260,"journal":{"name":"Blood Transfusion","volume":" ","pages":"484-491"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11576144/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2450/BloodTransfus.606","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pediatric Patient Blood Management (PBM) programs require continuous surveillance of errors and near misses. However, most PBM programs rely on passive surveillance methods. Our objective was to develop and evaluate a set of automated trigger tools for active surveillance of pediatric PBM errors.

Materials and methods: We used the Rand-UCLA method with an expert panel of pediatric transfusion medicine specialists to identify and prioritize candidate trigger tools for all transfused blood products. We then iteratively developed automated queries of electronic health record (EHR) data for the highest priority triggers. Two physicians manually reviewed a subset of cases meeting trigger tool criteria and estimated each trigger tool's positive predictive value (PPV). We then estimated the rate of PBM errors, whether they reached the patient, and adverse events for each trigger tool across four years in a single pediatric health system.

Results: We identified 28 potential triggers for pediatric PBM errors and developed 5 automated trigger tools (positive patient identification, missing irradiation, unwashed products despite prior anaphylaxis, transfusion lasting >4 hours, over-transfusion by volume). The PPV for ordering errors ranged from 38-100%. The most frequently detected near miss event reaching patients was first transfusions without positive patient identification (estimate 303, 95% CI: 288-318 per year). The only adverse events detected were from over-transfusions by volume, including 4 adverse events detected on manual review that had not been reported in passive surveillance systems.

Discussion: It is feasible to automatically detect pediatric PBM errors using existing data captured in the EHR that enable active surveillance systems. Over-transfusions may be one of the most frequent causes of harm in the pediatric environment.

开发和评估用于识别儿科血液管理错误的触发工具。
背景:儿科患者血液管理 (PBM) 计划需要持续监控错误和险情。然而,大多数 PBM 项目都依赖于被动监控方法。我们的目标是开发和评估一套自动触发工具,用于主动监控儿科 PBM 错误:我们使用兰德-加州大学洛杉矶分校的方法,由儿科输血医学专家组成专家小组,对所有输血产品的候选触发工具进行识别和优先排序。然后,我们对电子健康记录(EHR)数据进行迭代式自动查询,找出优先级最高的触发工具。两名医生人工审核符合触发工具标准的病例子集,并估算每种触发工具的阳性预测值 (PPV)。然后,我们估算了在一个儿科医疗系统中,每种触发工具在四年内的 PBM 错误率、是否到达患者以及不良事件的发生率:我们确定了 28 种潜在的儿科 PBM 错误触发因素,并开发了 5 种自动触发工具(阳性患者识别、缺失照射、之前发生过敏性休克但未清洗产品、输血持续时间超过 4 小时、按输血量计算输血过量)。排序错误的 PPV 在 38-100% 之间。患者最常发生的近乎失误事件是首次输血时患者身份未得到确认(估计为 303 例,95% CI:288-318 例/年)。检测到的唯一不良事件是按输血量计算的过度输血,其中包括人工审核发现的 4 起被动监测系统未报告的不良事件:讨论:利用电子病历中捕获的现有数据自动检测儿科 PBM 错误是可行的,这使得主动监测系统成为可能。过度输血可能是儿科环境中最常见的伤害原因之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Blood Transfusion
Blood Transfusion HEMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.70%
发文量
91
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Blood Transfusion welcomes international submissions of Original Articles, Review Articles, Case Reports and Letters on all the fields related to Transfusion Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信