Comparative diagnostic accuracy of transcranial Doppler and contrast-enhanced transthoracic echocardiography for the diagnosis of patent foramen ovale and atrial septal defect.

IF 4.3 4区 医学 0 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Panminerva medica Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-02 DOI:10.23736/S0031-0808.24.05123-1
Alberto M Lanzone, Emanuele V Castelluccio, Paolo Della Pina, Emiliano Boldi, Gianluca Lussardi, Giacomo Frati, Carlo Gaudio, Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai
{"title":"Comparative diagnostic accuracy of transcranial Doppler and contrast-enhanced transthoracic echocardiography for the diagnosis of patent foramen ovale and atrial septal defect.","authors":"Alberto M Lanzone, Emanuele V Castelluccio, Paolo Della Pina, Emiliano Boldi, Gianluca Lussardi, Giacomo Frati, Carlo Gaudio, Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai","doi":"10.23736/S0031-0808.24.05123-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recognition of right-to-left shunt is crucial in the work-up of patients with suspected patent foramen ovale (PFO) or atrial septal defect (ASD). While transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) remains the gold standard diagnostic tool for the anatomic assessment of PFO/ASD, transcranial Doppler (TCD) and contrast-enhanced transthoracic echocardiogram (CE-TTE) hold the promise of providing minimally invasive yet accurate clinical details. Their comparative accuracy remains however debated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective observational study leveraging our extensive institutional experience with systematic TCD and CE-TTE in patients with suspected PFO/ASD. Several measures of diagnostic test accuracy were computed, with point estimates and 95% confidence intervals, when applicable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1358 patients were included, with age 48±14 years and 772 (58%) women. Tests were performed for diagnostic purposes in 797 (58.6%) and during follow-up in 740 (54.5%). A PFO was eventually diagnosed in 1038 (77.9%) patients, and an ASD in 60 (4.5%). Agreement between TCD and CE-TTE occurred in 1309 (85.2%) cases, with TCD yielding worse findings than CE-TTE in 91 (5.9%) patients, and vice versa in 137 (8.9%), yielding a Cohen kappa of 78.6% (95% CI: 76.3-81.1%) and a highly significant P value at McNemar test (P<0.001). After dichotomization, and using TCD as benchmark, CE-TTE yielded sensitivity 96.9%, specificity 95.1%, area under the curve 92.1%, and P=0.249. Similar findings were obtained when focusing only on diagnostic tests or follow-up ones (Cohen kappa respectively 74.0% [70.2-77.1%], P<0.001 and 80.3% [76.4-84.3%], P<0.001). Notably, Valsalva was necessary to disclose the presence of shunt during TCD in 487 (31.7%) patients and during CE-TTE in 482 (31.4%) cases. Finally, performance of TCD and CE-TTE in a subset of patients eventually undergoing TTE was quite similar.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The diagnostic accuracy of CE-TTE appears favorable, and this imaging test may identify patients who may be missed if only TCD is used to screen patients with suspected PFO/ASD. Accordingly, CE-TTE is recommended as an adjunct diagnostic modality for all patients with a high pre-test probability of PFO/ASD and right-to-left shunt.</p>","PeriodicalId":19851,"journal":{"name":"Panminerva medica","volume":" ","pages":"124-130"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Panminerva medica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0031-0808.24.05123-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recognition of right-to-left shunt is crucial in the work-up of patients with suspected patent foramen ovale (PFO) or atrial septal defect (ASD). While transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) remains the gold standard diagnostic tool for the anatomic assessment of PFO/ASD, transcranial Doppler (TCD) and contrast-enhanced transthoracic echocardiogram (CE-TTE) hold the promise of providing minimally invasive yet accurate clinical details. Their comparative accuracy remains however debated.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study leveraging our extensive institutional experience with systematic TCD and CE-TTE in patients with suspected PFO/ASD. Several measures of diagnostic test accuracy were computed, with point estimates and 95% confidence intervals, when applicable.

Results: A total of 1358 patients were included, with age 48±14 years and 772 (58%) women. Tests were performed for diagnostic purposes in 797 (58.6%) and during follow-up in 740 (54.5%). A PFO was eventually diagnosed in 1038 (77.9%) patients, and an ASD in 60 (4.5%). Agreement between TCD and CE-TTE occurred in 1309 (85.2%) cases, with TCD yielding worse findings than CE-TTE in 91 (5.9%) patients, and vice versa in 137 (8.9%), yielding a Cohen kappa of 78.6% (95% CI: 76.3-81.1%) and a highly significant P value at McNemar test (P<0.001). After dichotomization, and using TCD as benchmark, CE-TTE yielded sensitivity 96.9%, specificity 95.1%, area under the curve 92.1%, and P=0.249. Similar findings were obtained when focusing only on diagnostic tests or follow-up ones (Cohen kappa respectively 74.0% [70.2-77.1%], P<0.001 and 80.3% [76.4-84.3%], P<0.001). Notably, Valsalva was necessary to disclose the presence of shunt during TCD in 487 (31.7%) patients and during CE-TTE in 482 (31.4%) cases. Finally, performance of TCD and CE-TTE in a subset of patients eventually undergoing TTE was quite similar.

Conclusions: The diagnostic accuracy of CE-TTE appears favorable, and this imaging test may identify patients who may be missed if only TCD is used to screen patients with suspected PFO/ASD. Accordingly, CE-TTE is recommended as an adjunct diagnostic modality for all patients with a high pre-test probability of PFO/ASD and right-to-left shunt.

经颅多普勒和对比增强经胸超声心动图诊断卵圆孔和房间隔缺损的准确性比较。
背景:识别右向左分流对疑似卵圆孔未闭(PFO)或房间隔缺损(ASD)患者的检查至关重要。虽然经食道超声心动图(TEE)仍是解剖评估 PFO/ASD 的金标准诊断工具,但经颅多普勒(TCD)和对比增强经胸超声心动图(CE-TTE)有望提供微创但准确的临床细节。然而,它们的比较准确性仍存在争议:我们对疑似 PFO/ASD 患者进行了系统的 TCD 和 CE-TTE 检查,并利用丰富的临床经验开展了一项回顾性观察研究。结果:共纳入 1358 例患者:共纳入 1358 例患者,年龄为 48±14 岁,其中 772 例(58%)为女性。797人(58.6%)进行了诊断性检查,740人(54.5%)在随访期间进行了检查。最终确诊 1038 名患者(77.9%)患有 PFO,60 名患者(4.5%)患有 ASD。1309例(85.2%)患者的TCD和CE-TTE结果一致,其中91例(5.9%)患者的TCD结果比CE-TTE结果差,反之亦然,137例(8.9%)患者的TCD结果比CE-TTE结果差,科恩卡帕值为78.6%(95% CI:76.3-81.1%),McNemar检验的P值非常显著(PConclusions:CE-TTE 的诊断准确性似乎很高,该成像检查可发现仅使用 TCD 筛查疑似 PFO/ASD 患者时可能漏诊的患者。因此,建议将 CE-TTE 作为一种辅助诊断方法,用于所有检测前 PFO/ASD 和右向左分流可能性较高的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Panminerva medica
Panminerva medica 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
2.30%
发文量
199
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Panminerva Medica publishes scientific papers on internal medicine. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work. Duties and responsibilities of all the subjects involved in the editorial process are summarized at Publication ethics. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信