The Association of Retinal Disease with Vision Impairment and Functional Status in Medicare Patients.

IF 2.3 Q2 ECONOMICS
Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research Pub Date : 2024-03-29 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.36469/001c.93022
Vincent Garmo, Xiaohui Zhao, Carmen D Ng, Aimee Near, Tania Banerji, Keiko Wada, Gary Oderda, Diana Brixner, Joseph Biskupiak, Ferhina S Ali, Archad M Khanani, Alicia Menezes, Ibrahim M Abbass
{"title":"The Association of Retinal Disease with Vision Impairment and Functional Status in Medicare Patients.","authors":"Vincent Garmo, Xiaohui Zhao, Carmen D Ng, Aimee Near, Tania Banerji, Keiko Wada, Gary Oderda, Diana Brixner, Joseph Biskupiak, Ferhina S Ali, Archad M Khanani, Alicia Menezes, Ibrahim M Abbass","doi":"10.36469/001c.93022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The association of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), diabetic macular edema (DME), and retinal vein occlusion (RVO) with functional status in the general Medicare population are not well established. <b>Objectives:</b> This study examined patient-reported survey data linked with Medicare claims to describe the burden of these vision-threatening retinal diseases (VTRDs) among Medicare beneficiaries. <b>Methods:</b> Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey data linked with Medicare Fee-for-Service claims data from 2006 to 2018 were used in a nationally representative retrospective pooled cross-sectional population-based comparison study. Outcomes between community-dwelling beneficiaries with nAMD (n = 1228), DME (n = 101), or RVO (n = 251) were compared with community-dwelling beneficiaries without any VTRDs (n = 104 088), controlling for baseline demographic and clinical differences. Beneficiaries with a diagnosis of nAMD, DME, or RVO during the data year were included; those with other VTRDs were excluded. Outcomes included vision function and loss, overall functioning as assessed by difficulties with activities of daily living (ADLs) and instrumental ADLs (iADLs), anxiety/depression, falls, and fractures. Results: In patient cohorts with nAMD, DME, and RVO, approximately one-third (34.2%-38.3%) reported \"a little trouble seeing\" (vs 28.3% for controls), and 26%, 17%, and 9%, respectively, reported \"a lot of trouble seeing/blindness\" (vs 5% of controls). Difficulty walking and doing heavy housework were the most reported ADLs and iADLs, respectively. Compared with those without VTRDs, beneficiaries with nAMD had higher odds of diagnosed vision loss (odds ratio [OR], 5.39; 95% confidence interval, 4.06-7.16; P < .001) and difficulties with iADLs (odds ratio, 1.41; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.80; P = .005); no differences were observed for DME or RVO vs control. After adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, poverty status, comorbidities, and other relevant covariates, nAMD, DME, and RVO were not significantly associated with anxiety/depression, falls, or fractures. <b>Discussion:</b> Patients with nAMD or DME were more likely to report severe visual impairment than those without VTRDs, although only those with nAMD were more likely to be diagnosed with vision loss. <b>Conclusions:</b> Patients with nAMD continue to experience more vision impairment and worse functional status compared with a similar population of Medicare beneficiaries despite availability of therapies like antivascular endothelial growth factor to treat retinal disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":16012,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","volume":"11 1","pages":"94-102"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10981881/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36469/001c.93022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The association of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), diabetic macular edema (DME), and retinal vein occlusion (RVO) with functional status in the general Medicare population are not well established. Objectives: This study examined patient-reported survey data linked with Medicare claims to describe the burden of these vision-threatening retinal diseases (VTRDs) among Medicare beneficiaries. Methods: Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey data linked with Medicare Fee-for-Service claims data from 2006 to 2018 were used in a nationally representative retrospective pooled cross-sectional population-based comparison study. Outcomes between community-dwelling beneficiaries with nAMD (n = 1228), DME (n = 101), or RVO (n = 251) were compared with community-dwelling beneficiaries without any VTRDs (n = 104 088), controlling for baseline demographic and clinical differences. Beneficiaries with a diagnosis of nAMD, DME, or RVO during the data year were included; those with other VTRDs were excluded. Outcomes included vision function and loss, overall functioning as assessed by difficulties with activities of daily living (ADLs) and instrumental ADLs (iADLs), anxiety/depression, falls, and fractures. Results: In patient cohorts with nAMD, DME, and RVO, approximately one-third (34.2%-38.3%) reported "a little trouble seeing" (vs 28.3% for controls), and 26%, 17%, and 9%, respectively, reported "a lot of trouble seeing/blindness" (vs 5% of controls). Difficulty walking and doing heavy housework were the most reported ADLs and iADLs, respectively. Compared with those without VTRDs, beneficiaries with nAMD had higher odds of diagnosed vision loss (odds ratio [OR], 5.39; 95% confidence interval, 4.06-7.16; P < .001) and difficulties with iADLs (odds ratio, 1.41; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.80; P = .005); no differences were observed for DME or RVO vs control. After adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, poverty status, comorbidities, and other relevant covariates, nAMD, DME, and RVO were not significantly associated with anxiety/depression, falls, or fractures. Discussion: Patients with nAMD or DME were more likely to report severe visual impairment than those without VTRDs, although only those with nAMD were more likely to be diagnosed with vision loss. Conclusions: Patients with nAMD continue to experience more vision impairment and worse functional status compared with a similar population of Medicare beneficiaries despite availability of therapies like antivascular endothelial growth factor to treat retinal disease.

医疗保险患者视网膜疾病与视力损伤和功能状态的关系。
背景:在普通医疗保险人群中,新生血管性老年性黄斑变性(nAMD)、糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)和视网膜静脉闭塞(RVO)与功能状态的关系尚未得到很好的证实。研究目的本研究检查了与医疗保险理赔相关联的患者报告调查数据,以描述这些威胁视力的视网膜疾病 (VTRD) 在医疗保险受益人中造成的负担。研究方法:在一项具有全国代表性的回顾性集合横断面人群比较研究中,使用了 2006 年至 2018 年与医疗保险付费服务理赔数据相关联的医疗保险当前受益人调查数据。将患有 nAMD(n = 1228)、DME(n = 101)或 RVO(n = 251)的社区居民受益人与未患有任何 VTRD 的社区居民受益人(n = 104 088)之间的结果进行了比较,并控制了基线人口统计学和临床差异。数据年期间被诊断出患有 nAMD、DME 或 RVO 的受益人被纳入其中;患有其他 VTRD 的受益人被排除在外。研究结果包括视力功能和视力丧失、以日常生活活动(ADLs)和工具性日常生活活动(iADLs)困难评估的整体功能、焦虑/抑郁、跌倒和骨折。研究结果在患有 nAMD、DME 和 RVO 的患者群体中,约有三分之一(34.2%-38.3%)的人表示 "看东西有点困难"(对照组为 28.3%),分别有 26%、17% 和 9% 的人表示 "看东西/失明非常困难"(对照组为 5%)。报告最多的日常活动能力和综合日常活动能力分别是行走困难和做繁重家务。与没有视力障碍的患者相比,患有 nAMD 的受益人确诊视力下降的几率更高(几率比 [OR],5.39;95% 置信区间,4.06-7.16;P 讨论):患有 nAMD 或 DME 的患者比没有 VTRD 的患者更有可能报告严重的视力损伤,尽管只有 nAMD 患者更有可能被诊断为视力丧失。结论:尽管有抗血管内皮生长因子等治疗视网膜疾病的疗法,但与类似的医疗保险受益人群相比,nAMD 患者的视力受损程度和功能状况仍然更严重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信